Conservation open space preferential property tax programs in the United States and policy considerations for states with agricultural use qualification requirements
{"title":"Conservation open space preferential property tax programs in the United States and policy considerations for states with agricultural use qualification requirements","authors":"Holly F. Henderson , Urs P. Kreuter","doi":"10.1016/j.rala.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>Retention of privately owned open space is becoming an increasing imperative throughout the United States, particularly in densely developed regions.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>As of 2022, 35 states have adopted some form of preferential tax treatment to conserve land based solely on its environmental value.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>In 11 states, including Texas, agricultural or timber production is a prerequisite to receiving this property tax reduction, which precludes ecologically valuable, nonworking land from being conserved through preferential property tax treatment.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>We evaluated 17 states that do not necessitate agricultural or timber use and present alternative strategies to protect land based on ecological significance.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Our results provide options for possible modification of Conservation Open Space Valuation to programs that do not possess production-oriented qualification requirements.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":101057,"journal":{"name":"Rangelands","volume":"47 2","pages":"Pages 136-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangelands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019005282500001X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
•
Retention of privately owned open space is becoming an increasing imperative throughout the United States, particularly in densely developed regions.
•
As of 2022, 35 states have adopted some form of preferential tax treatment to conserve land based solely on its environmental value.
•
In 11 states, including Texas, agricultural or timber production is a prerequisite to receiving this property tax reduction, which precludes ecologically valuable, nonworking land from being conserved through preferential property tax treatment.
•
We evaluated 17 states that do not necessitate agricultural or timber use and present alternative strategies to protect land based on ecological significance.
•
Our results provide options for possible modification of Conservation Open Space Valuation to programs that do not possess production-oriented qualification requirements.