Conservation open space preferential property tax programs in the United States and policy considerations for states with agricultural use qualification requirements

Holly F. Henderson , Urs P. Kreuter
{"title":"Conservation open space preferential property tax programs in the United States and policy considerations for states with agricultural use qualification requirements","authors":"Holly F. Henderson ,&nbsp;Urs P. Kreuter","doi":"10.1016/j.rala.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>Retention of privately owned open space is becoming an increasing imperative throughout the United States, particularly in densely developed regions.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>As of 2022, 35 states have adopted some form of preferential tax treatment to conserve land based solely on its environmental value.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>In 11 states, including Texas, agricultural or timber production is a prerequisite to receiving this property tax reduction, which precludes ecologically valuable, nonworking land from being conserved through preferential property tax treatment.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>We evaluated 17 states that do not necessitate agricultural or timber use and present alternative strategies to protect land based on ecological significance.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Our results provide options for possible modification of Conservation Open Space Valuation to programs that do not possess production-oriented qualification requirements.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":101057,"journal":{"name":"Rangelands","volume":"47 2","pages":"Pages 136-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangelands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019005282500001X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  • Retention of privately owned open space is becoming an increasing imperative throughout the United States, particularly in densely developed regions.
  • As of 2022, 35 states have adopted some form of preferential tax treatment to conserve land based solely on its environmental value.
  • In 11 states, including Texas, agricultural or timber production is a prerequisite to receiving this property tax reduction, which precludes ecologically valuable, nonworking land from being conserved through preferential property tax treatment.
  • We evaluated 17 states that do not necessitate agricultural or timber use and present alternative strategies to protect land based on ecological significance.
  • Our results provide options for possible modification of Conservation Open Space Valuation to programs that do not possess production-oriented qualification requirements.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信