Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Biliary Interventions

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hiroyuki Isayama, Ko Tomishima, Shigeto Ishii, Yusuke Takasaki, Mako Ushio, Toshio Fujisawa
{"title":"Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Biliary Interventions","authors":"Hiroyuki Isayama,&nbsp;Ko Tomishima,&nbsp;Shigeto Ishii,&nbsp;Yusuke Takasaki,&nbsp;Mako Ushio,&nbsp;Toshio Fujisawa","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2025.250916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Endosonographic/endoscopic ultrasound–guided biliary drainage/anastomosis (EUS-BD/A) is widely accepted as a salvage procedure when conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) fails or is difficult. Although this procedure carries risks of severe adverse events (AEs), including perforation and bile leakage due to unattached organs, the risk of postprocedural pancreatitis in EUS-BD/A is extremely low. The intrahepatic bile duct approach is more challenging than extrahepatic because it involves penetrating the liver parenchyma. To establish EUS-BD/A as a standard primary biliary drainage procedure, it is essential to confirm its feasibility compared with ERCP, evaluate expanded indications, develop dedicated devices, and establish AE management strategies. EUS-BD/A showed similar technical and clinical success rates and AE rates, with ERCP and incidence of pancreatitis was significantly lower. Expanded indications for EUS-BD/A include primary drainage, preoperative use, pediatric patients, patients with massive ascites, and reintervention for stent occlusion; however, further evidence is required to support these indications. The development of devices to improve technical success and reduce AE rates is critical to establishing this procedure, but current devices remain insufficient for EUS-BD/A. In Japan, dedicated devices for EUS-BD/A include sharp-tip bougie dilators, drill-type dilators, sharp-tip balloon dilators, and covered self-expandable metallic stents with effective anchoring. Reducing the gap between the device and guidewire is particularly important for endosonographic/endoscopic ultrasound–guided hepaticogastrostomy. Management of AEs and the establishment of follow-up strategies are crucial as well. We herein summarize the prevention and management of AEs, including mediastinitis due to esophageal puncture, bile leakage, bleeding, and perforation, and introduce our follow-up strategy. Our ultimate goal is to establish EUS-BD/A as a standard primary biliary drainage procedure. Continuous efforts are necessary to advance various aspects of EUS-BD/A.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"27 2","pages":"Article 250916"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259003072500011X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endosonographic/endoscopic ultrasound–guided biliary drainage/anastomosis (EUS-BD/A) is widely accepted as a salvage procedure when conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) fails or is difficult. Although this procedure carries risks of severe adverse events (AEs), including perforation and bile leakage due to unattached organs, the risk of postprocedural pancreatitis in EUS-BD/A is extremely low. The intrahepatic bile duct approach is more challenging than extrahepatic because it involves penetrating the liver parenchyma. To establish EUS-BD/A as a standard primary biliary drainage procedure, it is essential to confirm its feasibility compared with ERCP, evaluate expanded indications, develop dedicated devices, and establish AE management strategies. EUS-BD/A showed similar technical and clinical success rates and AE rates, with ERCP and incidence of pancreatitis was significantly lower. Expanded indications for EUS-BD/A include primary drainage, preoperative use, pediatric patients, patients with massive ascites, and reintervention for stent occlusion; however, further evidence is required to support these indications. The development of devices to improve technical success and reduce AE rates is critical to establishing this procedure, but current devices remain insufficient for EUS-BD/A. In Japan, dedicated devices for EUS-BD/A include sharp-tip bougie dilators, drill-type dilators, sharp-tip balloon dilators, and covered self-expandable metallic stents with effective anchoring. Reducing the gap between the device and guidewire is particularly important for endosonographic/endoscopic ultrasound–guided hepaticogastrostomy. Management of AEs and the establishment of follow-up strategies are crucial as well. We herein summarize the prevention and management of AEs, including mediastinitis due to esophageal puncture, bile leakage, bleeding, and perforation, and introduce our follow-up strategy. Our ultimate goal is to establish EUS-BD/A as a standard primary biliary drainage procedure. Continuous efforts are necessary to advance various aspects of EUS-BD/A.
超声内镜下胆道介入治疗
超声内镜/超声内镜引导胆道引流/吻合术(EUS-BD/A)被广泛接受为常规内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)失败或困难时的一种救助性手术。尽管该手术存在严重不良事件(ae)的风险,包括未附着器官引起的穿孔和胆漏,但EUS-BD/A术后胰腺炎的风险极低。肝内胆管入路比肝外胆管入路更具挑战性,因为它需要穿透肝实质。为了将EUS-BD/A作为标准的初级胆道引流手术,必须与ERCP进行比较,确认其可行性,评估扩大适应症,开发专用设备,建立AE管理策略。EUS-BD/A的技术和临床成功率和AE率相似,ERCP和胰腺炎发生率明显较低。EUS-BD/A的扩大适应症包括初级引流、术前使用、儿科患者、大量腹水患者和支架闭塞的再干预;然而,需要进一步的证据来支持这些适应症。提高技术成功率和降低AE率的设备的开发对于建立这一程序至关重要,但目前的设备仍然不足以满足EUS-BD/A。在日本,用于EUS-BD/A的专用设备包括尖尖膨胀式扩张器、钻式扩张器、尖尖球囊式扩张器和有效锚定的有盖自膨胀金属支架。减少器械与导丝之间的间隙对于超声内镜下肝胃造口术尤为重要。ae的管理和后续战略的制定也至关重要。我们在此总结ae的预防和处理,包括食管穿刺、胆漏、出血和穿孔引起的纵隔炎,并介绍我们的随访策略。我们的最终目标是建立EUS-BD/A作为标准的初级胆道引流手术。需要继续努力推进eu - bd /A的各个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信