Regional Anesthesia With Fascial Plane Blocks for Pediatric Cardiac Surgery With Sternotomy: A Narrative Review.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Gina C Russell, Lisa M Einhorn
{"title":"Regional Anesthesia With Fascial Plane Blocks for Pediatric Cardiac Surgery With Sternotomy: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Gina C Russell, Lisa M Einhorn","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Undertreated pain in children who undergo sternotomy for cardiac surgery can lead to cardiopulmonary complications, the development of chronic pain, and long-term maladaptive stress response. Opioids have dose-dependent side effects that may interfere with postoperative recovery. With the increasing availability of ultrasound, regional anesthesia is often included in multimodal analgesic approaches. Fascial plane blocks targeting the intercostal nerves or ventral rami are of particular interest for patients requiring full heparinization for cardiopulmonary bypass as they avoid manipulation of neuraxial and noncompressible paravertebral spaces. This narrative review summarizes the literature on fascial plane blocks for pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery via midline sternotomy and may serve as a guide for clinicians. Both prospective and retrospective studies are reviewed, as are prior review articles. We describe individual fascial plane block techniques including the transversus thoracic muscle plane, pectointercostal fascial plane, serratus anterior plane, and erector spinae plane blocks and provide clinical considerations for each block. Additionally, we provide an analysis of individual studies stratified by anterior or posterior approach and block type. The majority of described studies examine single-shot blocks; the existing catheter literature, which includes erector spinae plane block catheters, is also included. Our findings suggest that fascial plane blocks decrease intraoperative and postoperative opioid use, pain scores, time to extubation, and length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. Notably, prospective studies in this field are small, typically fewer than 100 patients, and overall include a homogenous patient population, focusing primarily on patients with acyanotic congenital heart defects. Nonetheless, despite the limitations of individual studies, there is substantial evidence to support the use of regional anesthesia, particularly for patients in whom early extubation is planned. There is a need for large, prospective multi-center studies to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of specific single-shot block types, optimal local anesthetic dosing strategies compared to active comparators, and generalizability of results across institutions. Future studies should also consider evaluating the role of regional block catheters for continuous local anesthetic infusion and the inclusion of additional surgical populations, including neonates, patients with cyanotic lesions, and those with longer postoperative mechanical ventilation courses.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007482","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Undertreated pain in children who undergo sternotomy for cardiac surgery can lead to cardiopulmonary complications, the development of chronic pain, and long-term maladaptive stress response. Opioids have dose-dependent side effects that may interfere with postoperative recovery. With the increasing availability of ultrasound, regional anesthesia is often included in multimodal analgesic approaches. Fascial plane blocks targeting the intercostal nerves or ventral rami are of particular interest for patients requiring full heparinization for cardiopulmonary bypass as they avoid manipulation of neuraxial and noncompressible paravertebral spaces. This narrative review summarizes the literature on fascial plane blocks for pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery via midline sternotomy and may serve as a guide for clinicians. Both prospective and retrospective studies are reviewed, as are prior review articles. We describe individual fascial plane block techniques including the transversus thoracic muscle plane, pectointercostal fascial plane, serratus anterior plane, and erector spinae plane blocks and provide clinical considerations for each block. Additionally, we provide an analysis of individual studies stratified by anterior or posterior approach and block type. The majority of described studies examine single-shot blocks; the existing catheter literature, which includes erector spinae plane block catheters, is also included. Our findings suggest that fascial plane blocks decrease intraoperative and postoperative opioid use, pain scores, time to extubation, and length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. Notably, prospective studies in this field are small, typically fewer than 100 patients, and overall include a homogenous patient population, focusing primarily on patients with acyanotic congenital heart defects. Nonetheless, despite the limitations of individual studies, there is substantial evidence to support the use of regional anesthesia, particularly for patients in whom early extubation is planned. There is a need for large, prospective multi-center studies to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of specific single-shot block types, optimal local anesthetic dosing strategies compared to active comparators, and generalizability of results across institutions. Future studies should also consider evaluating the role of regional block catheters for continuous local anesthetic infusion and the inclusion of additional surgical populations, including neonates, patients with cyanotic lesions, and those with longer postoperative mechanical ventilation courses.

在小儿心脏手术中使用筋膜平面阻滞进行区域麻醉,并进行缝合术:叙述性综述。
接受胸骨切开术进行心脏手术的儿童疼痛治疗不足可导致心肺并发症、慢性疼痛的发展和长期的适应不良应激反应。阿片类药物具有剂量依赖性副作用,可能干扰术后恢复。随着超声技术的日益普及,区域麻醉常被纳入多模式镇痛方法。针对肋间神经或腹支的筋膜平面阻滞对于需要完全肝素化的体外循环患者特别有意义,因为它们避免了对轴神经和不可压缩的椎旁间隙的操作。本文综述了经胸骨中线切开术的小儿心脏手术患者的筋膜平面阻滞的文献,并可作为临床医生的指导。前瞻性和回顾性研究都被回顾,就像之前的综述文章一样。我们描述了单独的筋膜平面阻滞技术,包括胸横肌平面、胸肋间筋膜平面、前锯肌平面和竖脊平面阻滞,并提供了每种阻滞的临床考虑。此外,我们还提供了按前路或后路入路和阻滞类型分层的个体研究分析。大多数描述的研究检查的是单次区块;现有的导管文献,其中包括直立脊柱平面阻滞导管,也包括在内。我们的研究结果表明,筋膜平面阻滞可减少术中和术后阿片类药物的使用、疼痛评分、拔管时间以及在重症监护病房和医院的住院时间。值得注意的是,该领域的前瞻性研究规模较小,通常少于100例患者,总体上包括同质患者群体,主要关注无氰先天性心脏缺陷患者。然而,尽管个别研究存在局限性,但有大量证据支持区域麻醉的使用,特别是对于计划早期拔管的患者。有必要进行大型、前瞻性的多中心研究,以评估特定单针阻滞类型的有效性和安全性,与活性比较物相比的最佳局部麻醉剂量策略,以及跨机构结果的普遍性。未来的研究还应考虑评估局部阻滞导管在持续局麻输注中的作用,并纳入更多的手术人群,包括新生儿、青紫病变患者和术后机械通气疗程较长的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信