Triple Antihypertensive Medication Prediction Score After Intracerebral Hemorrhage (the TRICH Score).

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology Pub Date : 2025-05-13 Epub Date: 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000213560
Ching Hei So, Charming Yeung, Ryan Wui-Hang Ho, Qing Hua Hou, Christopher H F Sum, William Leung, Yuen Kwun Wong, K C Roxanna Liu, Hon Hang Kwan, Joshua Fok, Edwin Kin-Keung Yip, Bun Sheng, Desmond Yat-Hin Yap, Gilberto K K Leung, Koon Ho Chan, Gary Kui Kai Lau, Kay Cheong Teo
{"title":"Triple Antihypertensive Medication Prediction Score After Intracerebral Hemorrhage (the TRICH Score).","authors":"Ching Hei So, Charming Yeung, Ryan Wui-Hang Ho, Qing Hua Hou, Christopher H F Sum, William Leung, Yuen Kwun Wong, K C Roxanna Liu, Hon Hang Kwan, Joshua Fok, Edwin Kin-Keung Yip, Bun Sheng, Desmond Yat-Hin Yap, Gilberto K K Leung, Koon Ho Chan, Gary Kui Kai Lau, Kay Cheong Teo","doi":"10.1212/WNL.0000000000213560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Poor long-term blood pressure (BP) control due to undertreatment of hypertension is not uncommon after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). It heightens the risk of ICH recurrence and subsequent stroke, which is the highest within the first year. Promptly achieving BP targets would significantly reduce these risks. To accomplish this, upfront triple antihypertensive medications could be prescribed soon after ICH because many ICH survivors require ≥3 antihypertensives. However, not all would suit this approach, particularly those with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), where elevated admission BP may be due to acute hypertensive response rather than underlying hypertension. In addition, overtreatment and excessive BP lowering would cause more side effects and have been associated with increased mortality in older patients. Hence, to facilitate individualized treatment, we aimed to develop a score (TRICH) to predict the need for ≥3 antihypertensives at 3 months after ICH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed the score using data from the University of Hong Kong prospective ICH registry (2011-2022) and validated it in 3 hospitals (2020-2022) locally. Consecutive patients with spontaneous ICH who survived >90 days and had follow-up BP 3 months after ICH were included. Predictors for needing ≥3 antihypertensive medications at 3 months were identified using multivariate logistic regression, and the score was created using the β-coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TRICH score was developed from 462 patients (mean age 66.6 ± 14.3 years, 60% male) and validated in 203 patients (mean age 66.3 ± 14.6 years, 62% male). The 9-point score (age younger than 60 years = 1, male = 1, ischemic heart disease = 1, admission estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> = 2, admission systolic BP 190-230 mm Hg = 2 while >230 mm Hg = 4) has a <i>c</i>-statistic (95% CI) of 0.79 (0.75-0.83) in the development cohort and 0.76 (0.69-0.82) in validation. A dichotomized score (≥3 points) predicted the need for ≥3 antihypertensives with 0.73 (95% CI 0.67-0.80) sensitivity and 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.81) specificity. The score performed better in patients with untreated/uncontrolled hypertension before ICH than in controlled patients (<i>c</i>-statistic [95% CI] 0.81 [0.77-0.86] vs 0.74 [0.69-0.80], <i>p</i> = 0.037) but showed no difference between patients with CAA and non-CAA patients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The TRICH score identifies patients with ICH who need ≥3 antihypertensive medications 3 months after ICH with good discrimination ability. It may guide upfront triple antihypertensive prescription, but further research is warranted, particularly in non-Han Chinese populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"104 9","pages":"e213560"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970930/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000213560","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Poor long-term blood pressure (BP) control due to undertreatment of hypertension is not uncommon after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). It heightens the risk of ICH recurrence and subsequent stroke, which is the highest within the first year. Promptly achieving BP targets would significantly reduce these risks. To accomplish this, upfront triple antihypertensive medications could be prescribed soon after ICH because many ICH survivors require ≥3 antihypertensives. However, not all would suit this approach, particularly those with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), where elevated admission BP may be due to acute hypertensive response rather than underlying hypertension. In addition, overtreatment and excessive BP lowering would cause more side effects and have been associated with increased mortality in older patients. Hence, to facilitate individualized treatment, we aimed to develop a score (TRICH) to predict the need for ≥3 antihypertensives at 3 months after ICH.

Methods: We developed the score using data from the University of Hong Kong prospective ICH registry (2011-2022) and validated it in 3 hospitals (2020-2022) locally. Consecutive patients with spontaneous ICH who survived >90 days and had follow-up BP 3 months after ICH were included. Predictors for needing ≥3 antihypertensive medications at 3 months were identified using multivariate logistic regression, and the score was created using the β-coefficients.

Results: The TRICH score was developed from 462 patients (mean age 66.6 ± 14.3 years, 60% male) and validated in 203 patients (mean age 66.3 ± 14.6 years, 62% male). The 9-point score (age younger than 60 years = 1, male = 1, ischemic heart disease = 1, admission estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 = 2, admission systolic BP 190-230 mm Hg = 2 while >230 mm Hg = 4) has a c-statistic (95% CI) of 0.79 (0.75-0.83) in the development cohort and 0.76 (0.69-0.82) in validation. A dichotomized score (≥3 points) predicted the need for ≥3 antihypertensives with 0.73 (95% CI 0.67-0.80) sensitivity and 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.81) specificity. The score performed better in patients with untreated/uncontrolled hypertension before ICH than in controlled patients (c-statistic [95% CI] 0.81 [0.77-0.86] vs 0.74 [0.69-0.80], p = 0.037) but showed no difference between patients with CAA and non-CAA patients.

Discussion: The TRICH score identifies patients with ICH who need ≥3 antihypertensive medications 3 months after ICH with good discrimination ability. It may guide upfront triple antihypertensive prescription, but further research is warranted, particularly in non-Han Chinese populations.

脑出血后三重抗高血压药物预测评分(TRICH评分)。
背景与目的:脑出血(ICH)后高血压治疗不充分导致长期血压控制不佳并不罕见。它增加了脑出血复发和随后中风的风险,这在第一年是最高的。迅速实现BP的目标将显著降低这些风险。为了实现这一目标,由于许多脑出血幸存者需要≥3种抗高血压药物,因此可以在脑出血后不久开先期三联抗高血压药物。然而,并不是所有的患者都适合这种方法,特别是那些患有脑淀粉样血管病(CAA)的患者,其入院血压升高可能是由于急性高血压反应而不是潜在的高血压。此外,过度治疗和过度降压会引起更多的副作用,并与老年患者死亡率增加有关。因此,为了促进个体化治疗,我们旨在制定一个评分(TRICH)来预测ICH后3个月是否需要服用≥3种抗高血压药物。方法:我们使用香港大学前瞻性ICH注册表(2011-2022)的数据开发评分,并在当地3家医院(2020-2022)进行验证。纳入自发性脑出血患者,患者存活bbb90天,脑出血后随访3个月。采用多因素logistic回归确定3个月时需要≥3种降压药物的预测因素,并采用β系数进行评分。结果:462例患者(平均年龄66.6±14.3岁,男性占60%)制定了TRICH评分,203例患者(平均年龄66.3±14.6岁,男性占62%)进行了验证。9分评分(年龄小于60岁= 1,男性= 1,缺血性心脏病= 1,入院时估计肾小球滤过率2 = 2,入院时收缩压190-230 mm Hg = 2,而bb0 230 mm Hg = 4)在发展队列中的c统计(95% CI)为0.79(0.75-0.83),在验证队列中的c统计(95% CI)为0.76(0.69-0.82)。二分类评分(≥3分)预测需要服用≥3种抗高血压药物的敏感性为0.73 (95% CI 0.67-0.80),特异性为0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.81)。在脑出血前未治疗/未控制的高血压患者的评分优于对照组(c-统计量[95% CI] 0.81 [0.77-0.86] vs 0.74 [0.69-0.80], p = 0.037),但CAA患者与非CAA患者之间无差异。讨论:TRICH评分对脑出血后3个月需要3种以上降压药物的患者有较好的鉴别能力。它可以指导前期三重抗高血压处方,但需要进一步的研究,特别是在非汉族人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology
Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1973
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology. As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content. Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信