Barriers to and enablers of type 2 diabetes screening among Indian and Chinese women with prior gestational diabetes: A qualitative study applying the Theoretical Domains Framework

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Adriana C.H. Neven , Amelia J Lake , Amelia Williams , Sharon Licqurish , Siew Lim , Sharleen L. O'Reilly , Christel Hendrieckx , Melinda Morrison , James A. Dunbar , Jane Speight , Helena Teede , Jacqueline A. Boyle , ME-MaGDA study group
{"title":"Barriers to and enablers of type 2 diabetes screening among Indian and Chinese women with prior gestational diabetes: A qualitative study applying the Theoretical Domains Framework","authors":"Adriana C.H. Neven ,&nbsp;Amelia J Lake ,&nbsp;Amelia Williams ,&nbsp;Sharon Licqurish ,&nbsp;Siew Lim ,&nbsp;Sharleen L. O'Reilly ,&nbsp;Christel Hendrieckx ,&nbsp;Melinda Morrison ,&nbsp;James A. Dunbar ,&nbsp;Jane Speight ,&nbsp;Helena Teede ,&nbsp;Jacqueline A. Boyle ,&nbsp;ME-MaGDA study group","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><div>Women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D).</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>In Australia, GDM and T2D prevalence are particularly high among Indian and Chinese women. Attendance for recommended postpartum T2D screening is low. Our aim was to identify modifiable barriers to, and enablers of, postpartum T2D screening among Chinese and Indian women with prior GDM in Australia, compare these to those of women with prior GDM from the general Australian population, and make culturally appropriate recommendations for intervention (messaging) content.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants were recruited via the National Gestational Diabetes Register and social media platforms. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in March-May 2021. Using an inductive-deductive approach, data were coded to Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) domains and mapped to the <em>Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B)</em> model.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Ten women participated: 6 Chinese born, 4 Indian born, nine of whom had previously screened for T2D. Nine influential TDF domains were identified, suggesting messaging content needs to address: <em>Motivation</em> (fear of T2D, encourage role modelling beliefs), <em>Opportunity</em> (encourage social support taking cultural and family norms into account), <em>Capability</em> (increase awareness of T2D risk, optimise prompts/reminders)</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Use of the COM-B and TDF suggests nine modifiable barriers to, and enablers of, postpartum T2D screening among Indian and Chinese-born women in Australia with prior GDM, mostly consistent with those of general Australian GDM populations. Culture-specific needs, such as including family in knowledge and support, and providing specific information regarding genetic- versus behaviour related risks can be accounted for within an inclusive messaging intervention addressing topics applicable to all women.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 104370"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613825000890","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem

Women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Background

In Australia, GDM and T2D prevalence are particularly high among Indian and Chinese women. Attendance for recommended postpartum T2D screening is low. Our aim was to identify modifiable barriers to, and enablers of, postpartum T2D screening among Chinese and Indian women with prior GDM in Australia, compare these to those of women with prior GDM from the general Australian population, and make culturally appropriate recommendations for intervention (messaging) content.

Methods

Participants were recruited via the National Gestational Diabetes Register and social media platforms. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in March-May 2021. Using an inductive-deductive approach, data were coded to Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) domains and mapped to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model.

Findings

Ten women participated: 6 Chinese born, 4 Indian born, nine of whom had previously screened for T2D. Nine influential TDF domains were identified, suggesting messaging content needs to address: Motivation (fear of T2D, encourage role modelling beliefs), Opportunity (encourage social support taking cultural and family norms into account), Capability (increase awareness of T2D risk, optimise prompts/reminders)

Conclusions

Use of the COM-B and TDF suggests nine modifiable barriers to, and enablers of, postpartum T2D screening among Indian and Chinese-born women in Australia with prior GDM, mostly consistent with those of general Australian GDM populations. Culture-specific needs, such as including family in knowledge and support, and providing specific information regarding genetic- versus behaviour related risks can be accounted for within an inclusive messaging intervention addressing topics applicable to all women.
曾患妊娠糖尿病的印度和中国妇女进行 2 型糖尿病筛查的障碍和促进因素:应用理论领域框架的定性研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信