Recruiting opioid treatment program administrators for a national survey: Outcomes and lessons learned

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Benjamin R Brady , Beth E Meyerson , Alissa Davis , Greg A Carter , Sara Najar , Alexa Martinez , Caleb Mueller , Elias O Higbie , Holden Dal Ponte , Khino Moneva , Natalia C Bentz , Linnea B Linde-Krieger , Zhanette Coffee , Arlene N Mahoney , David Frank , Richard A Crosby
{"title":"Recruiting opioid treatment program administrators for a national survey: Outcomes and lessons learned","authors":"Benjamin R Brady ,&nbsp;Beth E Meyerson ,&nbsp;Alissa Davis ,&nbsp;Greg A Carter ,&nbsp;Sara Najar ,&nbsp;Alexa Martinez ,&nbsp;Caleb Mueller ,&nbsp;Elias O Higbie ,&nbsp;Holden Dal Ponte ,&nbsp;Khino Moneva ,&nbsp;Natalia C Bentz ,&nbsp;Linnea B Linde-Krieger ,&nbsp;Zhanette Coffee ,&nbsp;Arlene N Mahoney ,&nbsp;David Frank ,&nbsp;Richard A Crosby","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Globally, access to opioid use disorder treatment remains insufficient. In the US, recent policy changes for opioid use disorder treatment present opportunities to improve patient access to evidence-based methadone treatment. To evaluate the adoption and sustained implementation of these changes, access to a national, representative sample of opioid treatment programs (OTPs, ‘methadone clinics’) is essential. This study reports the outcomes of a recruitment effort for a national sample of OTP administrators.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A stratified random sample of 1000 OTPs was drawn from the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's National Opioid Treatment Program Directory. Stratification was based on state-level OTP regulations and county-level opioid overdose rates. OTPs identified as tribal serving, located in jails or prisons, or requiring corporate approval for research participation were deemed ineligible and excluded from the sample. A team of trained researchers called OTP clinics seeking to speak with administrators and obtain their email addresses for study recruitment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the sample, 885 OTPs were eligible for study recruitment. We contacted a live person by phone at 73 % of OTPs and an administrator at 23 %. Of the administrators reached, 77 % agreed to receive study information and 22 % completed the survey. Total caller time was 276.5 hours at a cost of $5530.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite a rigorous sampling frame, and a costly and considerable effort, US OTP recruitment outcomes were suboptimal. Innovative strategies are needed to improve administrator recruitment. Recommendations include updating the SAMHSA directory to include administrator contact information (name, phone, email), using diverse outreach methods, and refining call scripts to improve engagement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 104799"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925000982","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Globally, access to opioid use disorder treatment remains insufficient. In the US, recent policy changes for opioid use disorder treatment present opportunities to improve patient access to evidence-based methadone treatment. To evaluate the adoption and sustained implementation of these changes, access to a national, representative sample of opioid treatment programs (OTPs, ‘methadone clinics’) is essential. This study reports the outcomes of a recruitment effort for a national sample of OTP administrators.

Methods

A stratified random sample of 1000 OTPs was drawn from the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's National Opioid Treatment Program Directory. Stratification was based on state-level OTP regulations and county-level opioid overdose rates. OTPs identified as tribal serving, located in jails or prisons, or requiring corporate approval for research participation were deemed ineligible and excluded from the sample. A team of trained researchers called OTP clinics seeking to speak with administrators and obtain their email addresses for study recruitment.

Results

In the sample, 885 OTPs were eligible for study recruitment. We contacted a live person by phone at 73 % of OTPs and an administrator at 23 %. Of the administrators reached, 77 % agreed to receive study information and 22 % completed the survey. Total caller time was 276.5 hours at a cost of $5530.

Conclusion

Despite a rigorous sampling frame, and a costly and considerable effort, US OTP recruitment outcomes were suboptimal. Innovative strategies are needed to improve administrator recruitment. Recommendations include updating the SAMHSA directory to include administrator contact information (name, phone, email), using diverse outreach methods, and refining call scripts to improve engagement.
招募阿片类药物治疗项目管理员进行全国调查:结果和经验教训
在全球范围内,阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的可及性仍然不足。在美国,最近阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的政策变化为改善患者获得基于证据的美沙酮治疗提供了机会。为了评估这些变化的采用和持续实施,获得全国性的、具有代表性的阿片类药物治疗方案样本(OTPs,“美沙酮诊所”)是至关重要的。本研究报告了一项针对全国OTP管理员样本的招聘工作的结果。方法从美国药物滥用和精神卫生服务管理局的国家阿片类药物治疗项目目录中抽取1000名otp进行分层随机抽样。分层是基于国家级OTP法规和县级阿片类药物过量率。被认定为部落服务、在监狱或监狱中或需要公司批准才能参与研究的otp被认为不合格,并被排除在样本之外。一组训练有素的研究人员打电话给OTP诊所,试图与管理人员交谈,并获得他们的电子邮件地址,以便进行研究招募。结果样本中有885名OTPs符合研究招募条件。我们通过电话联系了73%的otp和23%的管理员。在接受调查的管理人员中,77%的人同意接收研究信息,22%的人完成了调查。总通话时间为276.5小时,费用为5530美元。尽管有严格的抽样框架,以及昂贵和相当大的努力,美国OTP招聘结果不是最理想的。需要创新的策略来改善管理人员的招聘。建议包括更新SAMHSA目录,以包括管理员联系信息(姓名、电话、电子邮件),使用不同的外联方法,以及改进呼叫脚本以提高参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信