International Survey Assessing Gender Disparities in Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Katarzyna M. Pawlak , Kareem Khalaf , Erin Brennand , Andrei Voiosu , Theodor Voiosu , Giulio Antonelli , Sharan B. Malipatil , Caleb Na , Ahmed H. Mokhtar , Balqis Alabdulkarim , Maryam Mahjoob , Arjun Kundra , Jeanin van Hooft , Uzma Siddiqui , Roberta Maselli , Jeffrey D. Mosko , Jennifer Telford , Nauzer Forbes , Natalia Causada Calo
{"title":"International Survey Assessing Gender Disparities in Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy","authors":"Katarzyna M. Pawlak ,&nbsp;Kareem Khalaf ,&nbsp;Erin Brennand ,&nbsp;Andrei Voiosu ,&nbsp;Theodor Voiosu ,&nbsp;Giulio Antonelli ,&nbsp;Sharan B. Malipatil ,&nbsp;Caleb Na ,&nbsp;Ahmed H. Mokhtar ,&nbsp;Balqis Alabdulkarim ,&nbsp;Maryam Mahjoob ,&nbsp;Arjun Kundra ,&nbsp;Jeanin van Hooft ,&nbsp;Uzma Siddiqui ,&nbsp;Roberta Maselli ,&nbsp;Jeffrey D. Mosko ,&nbsp;Jennifer Telford ,&nbsp;Nauzer Forbes ,&nbsp;Natalia Causada Calo","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2025.250917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND AND AIMS</h3><div>Underrepresentation of women in advanced therapeutic endoscopy is a multifactorial issue. We aim to evaluate the concerns about fluoroscopy use across genders and assess its impact on the representation of women in advanced therapeutic endoscopy.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>An international survey was distributed in August of 2023 to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)–performing physicians. The primary outcome was the frequency of concerns related to fluoroscopy exposure. Secondary outcomes included the reasons or implication of these concerns. Subgroup analyses were performed across gender.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>ERCP-performing physicians revealed a gender disparity in therapeutic endoscopy, with 72.8% male respondents and 27.2% female respondents. Most participants were staff (67.6%), predominantly men (70.6%). The average age was 38.2 years, with a median institutional ERCP volume of 550 cases. Awareness of fluoroscopy safety standards was 56.1%, but only 51.6% received formal training. Concerns about radiation included cancer risk (73.4%) and fertility (43.9%). Usage of protective equipment was inadequate: thyroid dosimeters (21.9% always used), pelvic dosimeters (13.1%), and leaded goggles (8.4%). Female respondents specifically noted delayed family planning (27.6%) and fear of working while pregnant (40.4%), whereas male respondents focused on general health risks. Additionally, 68.4% of institutions recorded fluoroscopy time, but only 56.1% reported dosimeter use.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>Gender disparities in fluoroscopy exposure concerns warrant the need for improved training and safety standards to foster equity in therapeutic endoscopy. Addressing these issues through targeted education and policy changes will not only enhance awareness of radiation risks but also promote a more inclusive environment for both male and female practitioners.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"27 2","pages":"Article 250917"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030725000121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Underrepresentation of women in advanced therapeutic endoscopy is a multifactorial issue. We aim to evaluate the concerns about fluoroscopy use across genders and assess its impact on the representation of women in advanced therapeutic endoscopy.

METHODS

An international survey was distributed in August of 2023 to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)–performing physicians. The primary outcome was the frequency of concerns related to fluoroscopy exposure. Secondary outcomes included the reasons or implication of these concerns. Subgroup analyses were performed across gender.

RESULTS

ERCP-performing physicians revealed a gender disparity in therapeutic endoscopy, with 72.8% male respondents and 27.2% female respondents. Most participants were staff (67.6%), predominantly men (70.6%). The average age was 38.2 years, with a median institutional ERCP volume of 550 cases. Awareness of fluoroscopy safety standards was 56.1%, but only 51.6% received formal training. Concerns about radiation included cancer risk (73.4%) and fertility (43.9%). Usage of protective equipment was inadequate: thyroid dosimeters (21.9% always used), pelvic dosimeters (13.1%), and leaded goggles (8.4%). Female respondents specifically noted delayed family planning (27.6%) and fear of working while pregnant (40.4%), whereas male respondents focused on general health risks. Additionally, 68.4% of institutions recorded fluoroscopy time, but only 56.1% reported dosimeter use.

CONCLUSION

Gender disparities in fluoroscopy exposure concerns warrant the need for improved training and safety standards to foster equity in therapeutic endoscopy. Addressing these issues through targeted education and policy changes will not only enhance awareness of radiation risks but also promote a more inclusive environment for both male and female practitioners.
评估高级治疗性内窥镜中性别差异的国际调查
背景和目的女性在晚期治疗性内窥镜检查中的代表性不足是一个多因素问题。我们的目的是评估不同性别对透视使用的关注,并评估其对高级治疗性内窥镜中女性代表性的影响。方法于2023年8月对进行内窥镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)的医师进行国际调查。主要结果是与透视暴露相关的担忧频率。次要结局包括这些担忧的原因或含义。跨性别进行亚组分析。结果执行sercp的医生在治疗性内窥镜检查中存在性别差异,男性受访者占72.8%,女性受访者占27.2%。大多数参与者是工作人员(67.6%),主要是男性(70.6%)。平均年龄为38.2岁,中位机构ERCP量为550例。了解透视安全标准的比例为56.1%,但接受过正规培训的比例仅为51.6%。对辐射的担忧包括癌症风险(73.4%)和生育风险(43.9%)。防护设备的使用不足:甲状腺剂量计(21.9%总是使用)、盆腔剂量计(13.1%)和含铅护目镜(8.4%)。女性受访者特别提到推迟计划生育(27.6%)和害怕在怀孕期间工作(40.4%),而男性受访者则关注一般健康风险。此外,68.4%的机构记录了透视时间,但只有56.1%的机构报告了剂量计的使用。结论:在透视暴露方面的性别差异需要改进培训和安全标准,以促进治疗性内窥镜检查的公平性。通过有针对性的教育和政策改革来解决这些问题,不仅可以提高人们对辐射风险的认识,还可以为男性和女性从业者创造一个更包容的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信