The effect of once-weekly insulin icodec vs once-daily basal insulin on physical activity-attributed hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis of ONWARDS 1–5

IF 8.4 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Michael C. Riddell, Simon Heller, Lisbeth Carstensen, Thaís M. Pagliaro Rocha, Sara Kehlet Watt, Vincent C. Woo
{"title":"The effect of once-weekly insulin icodec vs once-daily basal insulin on physical activity-attributed hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis of ONWARDS 1–5","authors":"Michael C. Riddell, Simon Heller, Lisbeth Carstensen, Thaís M. Pagliaro Rocha, Sara Kehlet Watt, Vincent C. Woo","doi":"10.1007/s00125-025-06414-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims/hypothesis</h3><p>Physical activity increases the risk of hypoglycaemia in individuals with type 2 diabetes when basal or basal-bolus insulin therapy is administered. Once-weekly basal insulins may elevate the risk of physical activity-attributed hypoglycaemia compared with other basal insulins because the administered levels cannot be reduced in anticipation of increased physical activity. This post hoc analysis of five separate randomised trials (ONWARDS 1–5) aimed to examine physical activity-attributed hypoglycaemic episodes in adults with type 2 diabetes receiving either once-weekly basal insulin icodec (herein referred to as ‘icodec’) or once-daily basal insulins.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>The ONWARDS 1–5 Phase 3a randomised controlled trials compared the efficacy and safety of once-weekly basal icodec vs once-daily basal insulin in insulin-naive (ONWARDS 1, 3 and 5) and insulin-experienced (ONWARDS 2 and 4) adults with type 2 diabetes. Participants self-monitored their blood glucose levels using a blood glucose meter and a digital diary. In each trial, suspected hypoglycaemia symptoms triggered additional self-measured blood glucose readings, and values indicative of hypoglycaemia were recorded in the participants’ digital diary. Participants who experienced hypoglycaemic episodes were instructed to note any relation of each episode to physical activity. Hypoglycaemic episodes were classified as alert value (level 1: blood glucose &lt;3.9 but ≥3.0 mmol/l), clinically significant (level 2: blood glucose &lt;3.0 mmol/l) or severe (level 3: cognitive impairment requiring external assistance). The proportions of hypoglycaemic episodes that were attributed to physical activity and the ORs of having a physical activity-attributed hypoglycaemic episode were calculated for the two basal insulin types (once-weekly vs once-daily) for each of the five trials.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Across all trials, there were no consistent differences between icodec and the once-daily insulin comparators in the proportions of hypoglycaemic episodes that were attributed to physical activity; these episodes were mainly alert value or clinically significant hypoglycaemic episodes. In both insulin-naive and insulin-experienced participants, the incidence of physical activity-attributed clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episodes was consistently ≤3.0% in ONWARDS 1, 2, 3 and 5. In ONWARDS 4, the incidence of physical activity-attributed hypoglycaemic episodes was numerically higher in both treatment groups (18.6% [icodec] vs 17.9% [insulin glargine U100]), which was expected given the basal-bolus insulin regimen. Across all trials, there were no statistically significant differences in the odds of experiencing a physical activity-attributed clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episode with icodec vs once-daily insulin comparators. The frequency of recurrent clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episodes in the 24 h after a physical activity-attributed clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episode was low, with no such episodes in ONWARDS 1, 3 and 5. In contrast, in ONWARDS 2 and 4, the frequency of recurrent clinically significant hypoglycaemic episodes in the 24 h after a physical activity-attributed clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episode was numerically higher with icodec vs the once-daily insulin comparators, whilst no additional severe episodes were reported in any participants across the trials.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions/interpretation</h3><p>These findings do not suggest that there is an additional increase in hypoglycaemia risk attributed to physical activity with once-weekly basal icodec vs once-daily basal insulins in adults with type 2 diabetes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Trial registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04460885 (ONWARDS 1), NCT04770532 (ONWARDS 2), NCT04795531 (ONWARDS 3), NCT04880850 (ONWARDS 4) and NCT04760626 (ONWARDS 5).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-025-06414-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

Physical activity increases the risk of hypoglycaemia in individuals with type 2 diabetes when basal or basal-bolus insulin therapy is administered. Once-weekly basal insulins may elevate the risk of physical activity-attributed hypoglycaemia compared with other basal insulins because the administered levels cannot be reduced in anticipation of increased physical activity. This post hoc analysis of five separate randomised trials (ONWARDS 1–5) aimed to examine physical activity-attributed hypoglycaemic episodes in adults with type 2 diabetes receiving either once-weekly basal insulin icodec (herein referred to as ‘icodec’) or once-daily basal insulins.

Methods

The ONWARDS 1–5 Phase 3a randomised controlled trials compared the efficacy and safety of once-weekly basal icodec vs once-daily basal insulin in insulin-naive (ONWARDS 1, 3 and 5) and insulin-experienced (ONWARDS 2 and 4) adults with type 2 diabetes. Participants self-monitored their blood glucose levels using a blood glucose meter and a digital diary. In each trial, suspected hypoglycaemia symptoms triggered additional self-measured blood glucose readings, and values indicative of hypoglycaemia were recorded in the participants’ digital diary. Participants who experienced hypoglycaemic episodes were instructed to note any relation of each episode to physical activity. Hypoglycaemic episodes were classified as alert value (level 1: blood glucose <3.9 but ≥3.0 mmol/l), clinically significant (level 2: blood glucose <3.0 mmol/l) or severe (level 3: cognitive impairment requiring external assistance). The proportions of hypoglycaemic episodes that were attributed to physical activity and the ORs of having a physical activity-attributed hypoglycaemic episode were calculated for the two basal insulin types (once-weekly vs once-daily) for each of the five trials.

Results

Across all trials, there were no consistent differences between icodec and the once-daily insulin comparators in the proportions of hypoglycaemic episodes that were attributed to physical activity; these episodes were mainly alert value or clinically significant hypoglycaemic episodes. In both insulin-naive and insulin-experienced participants, the incidence of physical activity-attributed clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episodes was consistently ≤3.0% in ONWARDS 1, 2, 3 and 5. In ONWARDS 4, the incidence of physical activity-attributed hypoglycaemic episodes was numerically higher in both treatment groups (18.6% [icodec] vs 17.9% [insulin glargine U100]), which was expected given the basal-bolus insulin regimen. Across all trials, there were no statistically significant differences in the odds of experiencing a physical activity-attributed clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episode with icodec vs once-daily insulin comparators. The frequency of recurrent clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episodes in the 24 h after a physical activity-attributed clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episode was low, with no such episodes in ONWARDS 1, 3 and 5. In contrast, in ONWARDS 2 and 4, the frequency of recurrent clinically significant hypoglycaemic episodes in the 24 h after a physical activity-attributed clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episode was numerically higher with icodec vs the once-daily insulin comparators, whilst no additional severe episodes were reported in any participants across the trials.

Conclusions/interpretation

These findings do not suggest that there is an additional increase in hypoglycaemia risk attributed to physical activity with once-weekly basal icodec vs once-daily basal insulins in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04460885 (ONWARDS 1), NCT04770532 (ONWARDS 2), NCT04795531 (ONWARDS 3), NCT04880850 (ONWARDS 4) and NCT04760626 (ONWARDS 5).

Graphical Abstract

1周1次胰岛素icodec与1天1次基础胰岛素对2型糖尿病体力活动引起的低血糖的影响:一项事后分析
目的/假设2型糖尿病患者接受基础或基础胰岛素治疗时,运动可增加低血糖的风险。与其他基础胰岛素相比,每周一次的基础胰岛素可能会增加体力活动引起的低血糖的风险,因为不能在体力活动增加的预期下降低给药水平。本研究对5个独立的随机试验进行事后分析,旨在检查接受每周一次基础胰岛素icodec(在此称为“icodec”)或每天一次基础胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病成人患者的身体活动引起的低血糖发作。方法:在1 - 5期3a期随机对照试验中,比较了每周1次基础icodec与每天1次基础胰岛素治疗对胰岛素初治期(1、3和5)和胰岛素治疗期(2和4)成人2型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性。参与者使用血糖仪和电子日记自我监测他们的血糖水平。在每次试验中,疑似低血糖症状触发额外的自我测量血糖读数,低血糖的指示值被记录在参与者的数字日记中。经历过低血糖发作的参与者被要求记录每次发作与身体活动的关系。低血糖发作分为警戒值(1级:血糖3.9但≥3.0 mmol/l)、临床显著(2级:血糖3.0 mmol/l)或严重(3级:需要外部辅助的认知障碍)。计算了五项试验中每项试验中两种基础胰岛素类型(每周一次vs每天一次)由体育活动引起的低血糖发作的比例和由体育活动引起的低血糖发作的ORs。结果:在所有试验中,icodec和每日一次胰岛素比较组在归因于身体活动的低血糖发作比例上没有一致的差异;这些发作主要是警戒值或临床显著的低血糖发作。在胰岛素新手和有胰岛素经验的参与者中,在第1、2、3和5组中,身体活动导致的临床显著或严重低血糖发作的发生率始终≤3.0%。在第4期研究中,两个治疗组中体力活动引起的低血糖发作的发生率均较高(18.6% [icodec] vs 17.9%[甘精胰岛素U100]),这在基础注射胰岛素方案中是可以预料到的。在所有试验中,与每日一次胰岛素比较组相比,icodec组发生由身体活动引起的临床显著性或严重低血糖发作的几率没有统计学上的显著差异。在体育活动导致的临床显著性或严重低血糖发作后24小时内,复发的临床显著性或严重低血糖发作的频率很低,在1、3和5组中没有此类发作。相反,在第2期和第4期中,与每日1次胰岛素比较组相比,icodec组在24小时内因体育活动导致的临床显著性或严重低血糖发作后复发的临床显著性低血糖发作的频率在数值上更高,而在整个试验中没有任何参与者报告额外的严重发作。结论/解释:这些研究结果并不表明,在2型糖尿病成人患者中,每周1次基础胰岛素治疗与每天1次基础胰岛素治疗相比,低血糖风险会额外增加。临床试验注册:clinicaltrials .gov NCT04460885 (onward 1), NCT04770532 (onward 2), NCT04795531 (onward 3), NCT04880850 (onward 4)和NCT04760626 (onward 5)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetologia
Diabetologia 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
193
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Diabetologia, the authoritative journal dedicated to diabetes research, holds high visibility through society membership, libraries, and social media. As the official journal of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, it is ranked in the top quartile of the 2019 JCR Impact Factors in the Endocrinology & Metabolism category. The journal boasts dedicated and expert editorial teams committed to supporting authors throughout the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信