Evaluating the Impact of a Ki-67 Decision Support Algorithm on Pathology Residents' Scoring Accuracy.

Mine İlayda Şengör Aygün, Özben Yalçın, Burak Uzel, Gamze Kulduk, Cem Çomunoğlu
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of a Ki-67 Decision Support Algorithm on Pathology Residents' Scoring Accuracy.","authors":"Mine İlayda Şengör Aygün, Özben Yalçın, Burak Uzel, Gamze Kulduk, Cem Çomunoğlu","doi":"10.1007/s10278-025-01490-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ki-67 scoring is of essential importance in the evaluation of breast cancer. We evaluated a Ki-67 algorithm as a decision support tool to improve accuracy for pathology residents. We retrospectively evaluated Ki-67 scores on whole slide images (WSI) obtained from 156 consecutive breast cancer patients. Two senior pathologists determined the 2.1 mm<sup>2</sup> hotspot to be evaluated. Ki-67 scores from senior pathologists were compared with results generated by the algorithm, results from 10 pathology residents, and results from pathology residents with the assistance of the algorithm. In addition to numerical results from the algorithm, residents were also presented with a visual representation of nuclei that were counted and excluded. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon and intra-class correlation (ICC) tests. The mean Ki-67 scores from senior pathologists and the algorithm were 23 ± 18 and 24 ± 18, respectively (ICC, 0.98). Ki-67 scores from the residents were 19 ± 16 and 22 ± 16, without and with input from the algorithm, respectively. With input from the algorithm, residents' scores were significantly closer to those obtained by senior pathologists (p = 0.008). Residents modified their scores in 53.8% of the cases where 74% of the better scores were characterized by an increase in the original scores. The results obtained by the Ki-67 algorithm were highly correlated with those assessed by senior pathologists. We demonstrated that the algorithm may serve as a decision support tool for residents to align their results with those of senior pathologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01490-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ki-67 scoring is of essential importance in the evaluation of breast cancer. We evaluated a Ki-67 algorithm as a decision support tool to improve accuracy for pathology residents. We retrospectively evaluated Ki-67 scores on whole slide images (WSI) obtained from 156 consecutive breast cancer patients. Two senior pathologists determined the 2.1 mm2 hotspot to be evaluated. Ki-67 scores from senior pathologists were compared with results generated by the algorithm, results from 10 pathology residents, and results from pathology residents with the assistance of the algorithm. In addition to numerical results from the algorithm, residents were also presented with a visual representation of nuclei that were counted and excluded. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon and intra-class correlation (ICC) tests. The mean Ki-67 scores from senior pathologists and the algorithm were 23 ± 18 and 24 ± 18, respectively (ICC, 0.98). Ki-67 scores from the residents were 19 ± 16 and 22 ± 16, without and with input from the algorithm, respectively. With input from the algorithm, residents' scores were significantly closer to those obtained by senior pathologists (p = 0.008). Residents modified their scores in 53.8% of the cases where 74% of the better scores were characterized by an increase in the original scores. The results obtained by the Ki-67 algorithm were highly correlated with those assessed by senior pathologists. We demonstrated that the algorithm may serve as a decision support tool for residents to align their results with those of senior pathologists.

Ki-67 评分在乳腺癌评估中至关重要。我们评估了一种 Ki-67 算法,将其作为一种决策支持工具,以提高病理科住院医生的准确性。我们回顾性地评估了 156 名连续乳腺癌患者全切片图像(WSI)上的 Ki-67 评分。两名资深病理学家确定了需要评估的 2.1 平方毫米热点。将资深病理学家的 Ki-67 评分与算法生成的结果、10 位病理住院医师的结果以及病理住院医师在算法辅助下的结果进行了比较。除了算法得出的数字结果外,住院医师还能直观地看到被计数和排除的细胞核。统计分析采用 Wilcoxon 和类内相关 (ICC) 检验。资深病理学家和算法得出的平均 Ki-67 评分分别为 23 ± 18 和 24 ± 18(ICC,0.98)。住院医师的 Ki-67 评分分别为 19 ± 16 和 22 ± 16(无算法输入和有算法输入)。有了算法的输入,住院医生的评分明显更接近资深病理学家的评分(p = 0.008)。住院医师对53.8%的病例进行了评分修改,其中74%的较好评分以原始评分的增加为特征。Ki-67 算法得出的结果与资深病理学家的评估结果高度相关。我们证明,该算法可作为住院医生的决策支持工具,使他们的结果与资深病理学家的结果保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信