Care managers' experiences of interprofessional collaborative practice with physicians in community-based integrated care: a qualitative study.

Yoshihisa Hirakawa, Erik Masao Eriksson
{"title":"Care managers' experiences of interprofessional collaborative practice with physicians in community-based integrated care: a qualitative study.","authors":"Yoshihisa Hirakawa, Erik Masao Eriksson","doi":"10.2185/jrm.2024-045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Under Japan's Long-term Care Insurance system, care managers (CMs) are expected to function as coordinators in the community-based integrated care system. However, few studies have focused on inter-professional collaboration between medical and non-medical professionals. The aim of this study was to identify CMs' perspectives on enablers and barriers to successful collaboration between care managers and physicians within the community.</p><p><strong>Patient/materials and methods: </strong>We targeted care managers with ample experience working as CMs in the community and recruited 12 CMs using snowball sampling. Online interviews were conducted from January to May 2023 using an open-ended questionnaire concerning participants' experiences of collaborating with physicians and integrating medical services into care management. Qualitative data were analyzed through inductive manual coding using a qualitative content analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four main themes were identified as enablers and barriers to successful CM-physician collaboration in the community: medical knowledge, professional attitudes, communication skills, and the professional culture of medicine. Equipping CMs with practical medical knowledge is essential for effective communication. Professional attitudes among CMs are imperative to fostering collaborative relationships. Effective communication skills are another critical factor, emphasizing the need for clarity, specificity, and utilization of nurses as key mediators in physician-care manager dialogue. Recognizing and navigating the professional culture of medicine is essential to overcome barriers stemming from differences in norms, beliefs, and practices between CMs and medical professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the significance of interprofessional education focusing on cultural differences and the development of systematic learning approaches to enhance CMs' medical knowledge of CMs. Furthermore, the findings highlight the need for clarity in defining CMs' roles within healthcare teams and addressing physicians' misperceptions regarding their contributions and responsibilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":73939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rural medicine : JRM","volume":"20 2","pages":"132-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11962194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rural medicine : JRM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2185/jrm.2024-045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Under Japan's Long-term Care Insurance system, care managers (CMs) are expected to function as coordinators in the community-based integrated care system. However, few studies have focused on inter-professional collaboration between medical and non-medical professionals. The aim of this study was to identify CMs' perspectives on enablers and barriers to successful collaboration between care managers and physicians within the community.

Patient/materials and methods: We targeted care managers with ample experience working as CMs in the community and recruited 12 CMs using snowball sampling. Online interviews were conducted from January to May 2023 using an open-ended questionnaire concerning participants' experiences of collaborating with physicians and integrating medical services into care management. Qualitative data were analyzed through inductive manual coding using a qualitative content analysis approach.

Results: Four main themes were identified as enablers and barriers to successful CM-physician collaboration in the community: medical knowledge, professional attitudes, communication skills, and the professional culture of medicine. Equipping CMs with practical medical knowledge is essential for effective communication. Professional attitudes among CMs are imperative to fostering collaborative relationships. Effective communication skills are another critical factor, emphasizing the need for clarity, specificity, and utilization of nurses as key mediators in physician-care manager dialogue. Recognizing and navigating the professional culture of medicine is essential to overcome barriers stemming from differences in norms, beliefs, and practices between CMs and medical professionals.

Conclusion: This study underscores the significance of interprofessional education focusing on cultural differences and the development of systematic learning approaches to enhance CMs' medical knowledge of CMs. Furthermore, the findings highlight the need for clarity in defining CMs' roles within healthcare teams and addressing physicians' misperceptions regarding their contributions and responsibilities.

护理管理者在社区综合护理中与医生的跨专业合作实践经验:一项定性研究。
目的:在日本的长期护理保险制度下,护理经理(CMs)被期望在社区综合护理系统中发挥协调员的作用。然而,很少有研究关注医疗和非医疗专业人员之间的跨专业合作。本研究的目的是确定CMs对社区内护理经理和医生之间成功合作的促成因素和障碍的看法。患者/材料和方法:我们以具有丰富社区CMs工作经验的护理管理人员为目标,采用滚雪球抽样方法招募12名CMs。在线访谈于2023年1月至5月进行,使用开放式问卷调查参与者与医生合作和将医疗服务纳入护理管理的经验。采用定性内容分析方法对定性数据进行归纳手工编码分析。结果:四个主要主题被确定为社区中成功的中医-医生合作的促进因素和障碍:医学知识、专业态度、沟通技巧和医学专业文化。为CMs提供实用的医学知识是有效沟通的必要条件。CMs之间的专业态度对于促进合作关系至关重要。有效的沟通技巧是另一个关键因素,强调了护士作为医生与护理管理者对话的关键调解人的清晰、特异性和利用的必要性。认识和驾驭医学专业文化对于克服因规范、信仰和实践差异而产生的障碍至关重要。结论:本研究强调了注重文化差异的跨专业教育和系统学习方法的发展对提高CMs医学知识的重要性。此外,研究结果强调需要明确界定CMs在医疗团队中的角色,并解决医生对其贡献和责任的误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信