Out-of-field neutron radiation from clinical proton, helium, carbon, and oxygen ion beams.

Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1002/mp.17797
Matteo Bolzonella, Marco Caresana, Andrea Cirillo, Josep M Martí-Climent, Evangelina Martínez-Francés, Christina Mooshammer, Stefan Schmidt, Stephan Brons, Marco Silari, Christina Stengl, Liliana Stolarczyk, José Vedelago
{"title":"Out-of-field neutron radiation from clinical proton, helium, carbon, and oxygen ion beams.","authors":"Matteo Bolzonella, Marco Caresana, Andrea Cirillo, Josep M Martí-Climent, Evangelina Martínez-Francés, Christina Mooshammer, Stefan Schmidt, Stephan Brons, Marco Silari, Christina Stengl, Liliana Stolarczyk, José Vedelago","doi":"10.1002/mp.17797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In hadron therapy, out-of-field doses, which may in the long-term cause secondary cancers, are mostly due to neutrons. Very recently, <sup>4</sup>He and <sup>16</sup>O beams have been added to protons and <sup>12</sup>C ions for clinical therapy.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The focus of this article is to compare secondary neutron doses produced by clinical protons, <sup>4</sup>He, <sup>12</sup>C, and <sup>16</sup>O ion beams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ambient dose equivalent, H*(10), measurements were performed, with five types of rem counters, of the neutron field produced by the four primary ions impinging on a water phantom. This experiment was performed at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT) in the framework of the activities of the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS). The experimental data are normalized to both unit primary particle and target dose, and are further compared to Monte Carlo (MC) simulations performed with the FLUKA and MCNP codes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intensity of the neutron field increases with ion mass, and the trend is more significant in the forward direction. The minimum H*(10) for all ions, 5µSv/Gy to 10µSv/Gy, was measured in the transverse and backward directions, whereas the maximum measured value was about 1.3 mSv/Gy for primary <sup>16</sup>O ions in the forward direction. Additional MC simulations are presented for a more detailed analysis of the rem counters' response in the presence of heavy charged fragments. In the downstream direction, for <sup>12</sup>C and <sup>16</sup>O ions, approximately only 30% of the instruments' counts are due to neutrons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The four extended-range instruments provide reliable and consistent results, whereas the conventional rem counter underestimates H*(10) in a neutron field with a large high-energy component. FLUKA and MCNP provide consistent predictions, within a factor of 1.6 for the downstream position and lower differences in the other cases, and are in agreement with the experimental data. It was found that under certain conditions neutrons do not represent the only secondary radiation field to be monitored; the presence of charged particles affects the performance of moderator-type neutron detectors.</p>","PeriodicalId":94136,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In hadron therapy, out-of-field doses, which may in the long-term cause secondary cancers, are mostly due to neutrons. Very recently, 4He and 16O beams have been added to protons and 12C ions for clinical therapy.

Purpose: The focus of this article is to compare secondary neutron doses produced by clinical protons, 4He, 12C, and 16O ion beams.

Methods: Ambient dose equivalent, H*(10), measurements were performed, with five types of rem counters, of the neutron field produced by the four primary ions impinging on a water phantom. This experiment was performed at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT) in the framework of the activities of the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS). The experimental data are normalized to both unit primary particle and target dose, and are further compared to Monte Carlo (MC) simulations performed with the FLUKA and MCNP codes.

Results: The intensity of the neutron field increases with ion mass, and the trend is more significant in the forward direction. The minimum H*(10) for all ions, 5µSv/Gy to 10µSv/Gy, was measured in the transverse and backward directions, whereas the maximum measured value was about 1.3 mSv/Gy for primary 16O ions in the forward direction. Additional MC simulations are presented for a more detailed analysis of the rem counters' response in the presence of heavy charged fragments. In the downstream direction, for 12C and 16O ions, approximately only 30% of the instruments' counts are due to neutrons.

Conclusion: The four extended-range instruments provide reliable and consistent results, whereas the conventional rem counter underestimates H*(10) in a neutron field with a large high-energy component. FLUKA and MCNP provide consistent predictions, within a factor of 1.6 for the downstream position and lower differences in the other cases, and are in agreement with the experimental data. It was found that under certain conditions neutrons do not represent the only secondary radiation field to be monitored; the presence of charged particles affects the performance of moderator-type neutron detectors.

临床质子、氦、碳和氧离子束的场外中子辐射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信