Finish What's Started: American Urogynecologic Society Pelvic Floor Disorder Week Abstract Publishing Rates.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Alexandra L Tabakin, Jessica Kahan, Jinsol Hyun, Wai Lee, Harvey A Winkler, Dara F Shalom
{"title":"Finish What's Started: American Urogynecologic Society Pelvic Floor Disorder Week Abstract Publishing Rates.","authors":"Alexandra L Tabakin, Jessica Kahan, Jinsol Hyun, Wai Lee, Harvey A Winkler, Dara F Shalom","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Little is known regarding the publication rate of abstracts presented at the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS) Pelvic Floor Disorder Week (PFD).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our aims were to determine contemporary publication rates of AUGS PFD oral and poster presentation abstracts and factors associated with publication.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In this retrospective study, we reviewed short and long oral and poster abstracts from 2019 and 2020 AUGS PFD. Article publication rates were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed with Kruskal-Wallis and χ2 tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with likelihood of publication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 831 abstracts from the 2019 and 2020 PFD. Publication rates were 23.5%, 45.4%, and 53.3% at 1, 2, and 3 years (55.1% overall) with median time to publication of 16 months. For published abstracts, median journal impact factor was 2 with median principal investigator H-index of 15. Long and short podium presentations were 4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-7.6) and 1.8 times (CI, 1.2-2.5), respectively, as likely to be published than poster presentations (both P < 0.01). Resident/fellow (odds ratio [OR] 1.7, [95% CI, 1.2-2.4], P < 0.01) and female first-authorship (OR 1.4, [95% CI, 1.0-2.0], P = 0.04) and randomized control trials (OR 2.33, [95% CI, 1.2-4.7], P = 0.02) were predictive of publication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nearly half the abstracts from AUGS PFD 2019 and 2020 are unpublished. Abstracts with oral presentations, female and trainee first authors, and randomized control trials were more likely to be published. Ultimately, timely publication is critical for ensuring reliability of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Little is known regarding the publication rate of abstracts presented at the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS) Pelvic Floor Disorder Week (PFD).

Objective: Our aims were to determine contemporary publication rates of AUGS PFD oral and poster presentation abstracts and factors associated with publication.

Study design: In this retrospective study, we reviewed short and long oral and poster abstracts from 2019 and 2020 AUGS PFD. Article publication rates were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed with Kruskal-Wallis and χ2 tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with likelihood of publication.

Results: We identified 831 abstracts from the 2019 and 2020 PFD. Publication rates were 23.5%, 45.4%, and 53.3% at 1, 2, and 3 years (55.1% overall) with median time to publication of 16 months. For published abstracts, median journal impact factor was 2 with median principal investigator H-index of 15. Long and short podium presentations were 4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-7.6) and 1.8 times (CI, 1.2-2.5), respectively, as likely to be published than poster presentations (both P < 0.01). Resident/fellow (odds ratio [OR] 1.7, [95% CI, 1.2-2.4], P < 0.01) and female first-authorship (OR 1.4, [95% CI, 1.0-2.0], P = 0.04) and randomized control trials (OR 2.33, [95% CI, 1.2-4.7], P = 0.02) were predictive of publication.

Conclusions: Nearly half the abstracts from AUGS PFD 2019 and 2020 are unpublished. Abstracts with oral presentations, female and trainee first authors, and randomized control trials were more likely to be published. Ultimately, timely publication is critical for ensuring reliability of evidence.

完成已开始的工作:美国泌尿妇科学会盆底疾病周摘要发表率。
重要性:关于在美国泌尿妇科学会(AUGS)盆底疾病周(PFD)上发表的摘要的发表率知之甚少。目的:我们的目的是确定AUGS PFD口头和海报展示摘要的当代发表率以及与发表相关的因素。研究设计:在这项回顾性研究中,我们回顾了2019年和2020年AUGS PFD的简短和长篇口头和海报摘要。计算文章发表率。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和χ2检验进行统计学分析。多变量逻辑回归用于评估与发表可能性相关的因素。结果:我们从2019年和2020年的PFD中筛选出831篇摘要。1年、2年和3年的发表率分别为23.5%、45.4%和53.3%(总体55.1%),中位发表时间为16个月。已发表摘要的期刊影响因子中位数为2,主要研究者h指数中位数为15。较长和较短的讲台演讲发表的可能性分别是海报演讲的4倍(95%可信区间[CI], 2.2-7.6)和1.8倍(CI, 1.2-2.5) (P均< 0.01)。住院医师/研究员(比值比[OR] 1.7, [95% CI, 1.2-2.4], P < 0.01)、女性第一作者(比值比[OR] 1.4, [95% CI, 1.0-2.0], P = 0.04)和随机对照试验(比值比[OR] 2.33, [95% CI, 1.2-4.7], P = 0.02)预测发表。结论:AUGS PFD 2019和2020的近一半摘要未发表。口头陈述、女性和实习第一作者以及随机对照试验的摘要更有可能发表。最终,及时发表对于确保证据的可靠性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信