Comparing the financial, energy and time costs of different food and stove combinations in Nairobi using controlled cooking tests and longitudinal fuel price data.

UCL open environment Pub Date : 2025-03-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.14324/111.444/ucloe.3034
Tash Perros, Mark O'Keefe, James Mwitari, Lewis Gichane, Elisa Puzzolo, Daniel Pope
{"title":"Comparing the financial, energy and time costs of different food and stove combinations in Nairobi using controlled cooking tests and longitudinal fuel price data.","authors":"Tash Perros, Mark O'Keefe, James Mwitari, Lewis Gichane, Elisa Puzzolo, Daniel Pope","doi":"10.14324/111.444/ucloe.3034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With a wide range of stoves and appliances available in the ever-evolving Kenyan cooking market, it is important to understand which options are the most cost, time and energy efficient to use. This information can help households to make more informed decisions about their energy use and policy makers to better understand which solutions to promote. Despite its importance, the existing literature offers scant evidence to guide optimal stove and fuel choices. In this research, we utilised controlled cooking tests to investigate the fuel required to cook six regularly prepared dishes on 10 prevalent stove and fuel combinations (including liquified petroleum gas, ethanol, charcoal, kerosene and electric appliances). We also tested the efficiency improvements from pre-soaking beans and using stovetop pressure cookers. We collected primary fuel cost data from across Nairobi in June 2023 and collated historical fuel prices from secondary sources spanning 2019-2023. The prices of liquified petroleum gas, charcoal and kerosene varied considerably by variables such as brand and location, whereas ethanol and on-grid electricity were more stable. The electric pressure cooker was the most cost- and energy-efficient device. For liquified petroleum gas and charcoal, combining pre-soaking beans with a pressure cooker substantially reduced fuel consumption, but was still costlier than the electric pressure cooker. The longitudinal comparison highlighted the dynamic nature of fuel prices in Kenya and how a household's cost-optimal cooking stack can change at short notice. These findings demonstrate how comparative affordability varies both temporally and spatially and can be heavily affected by wider market and policy incentives.</p>","PeriodicalId":75271,"journal":{"name":"UCL open environment","volume":"7 ","pages":"e3034"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UCL open environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444/ucloe.3034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With a wide range of stoves and appliances available in the ever-evolving Kenyan cooking market, it is important to understand which options are the most cost, time and energy efficient to use. This information can help households to make more informed decisions about their energy use and policy makers to better understand which solutions to promote. Despite its importance, the existing literature offers scant evidence to guide optimal stove and fuel choices. In this research, we utilised controlled cooking tests to investigate the fuel required to cook six regularly prepared dishes on 10 prevalent stove and fuel combinations (including liquified petroleum gas, ethanol, charcoal, kerosene and electric appliances). We also tested the efficiency improvements from pre-soaking beans and using stovetop pressure cookers. We collected primary fuel cost data from across Nairobi in June 2023 and collated historical fuel prices from secondary sources spanning 2019-2023. The prices of liquified petroleum gas, charcoal and kerosene varied considerably by variables such as brand and location, whereas ethanol and on-grid electricity were more stable. The electric pressure cooker was the most cost- and energy-efficient device. For liquified petroleum gas and charcoal, combining pre-soaking beans with a pressure cooker substantially reduced fuel consumption, but was still costlier than the electric pressure cooker. The longitudinal comparison highlighted the dynamic nature of fuel prices in Kenya and how a household's cost-optimal cooking stack can change at short notice. These findings demonstrate how comparative affordability varies both temporally and spatially and can be heavily affected by wider market and policy incentives.

利用受控烹饪试验和纵向燃料价格数据,比较内罗毕不同食物和炉灶组合的财务、能源和时间成本。
在不断发展的肯尼亚烹饪市场上,有各种各样的炉灶和电器可供选择,重要的是要了解哪种选择最节省成本、时间和能源。这些信息可以帮助家庭在能源使用方面做出更明智的决定,也可以帮助政策制定者更好地了解应该推广哪些解决方案。尽管它很重要,但现有的文献提供了很少的证据来指导最佳的炉子和燃料选择。在这项研究中,我们利用控制烹饪试验来调查在10种常见的炉子和燃料组合(包括液化石油气、乙醇、木炭、煤油和电器)上烹饪六种定期准备的菜肴所需的燃料。我们还测试了预浸泡豆子和使用炉顶高压锅对效率的提高。我们于2023年6月收集了内罗毕各地的一次燃料成本数据,并整理了2019-2023年期间二手来源的历史燃料价格。液化石油气、木炭和煤油的价格因品牌和地点等变量而有很大差异,而乙醇和并网电力的价格则较为稳定。电压力锅是最经济、最节能的器具。对于液化石油气和木炭,将预先浸泡的豆子与压力锅相结合,大大减少了燃料消耗,但仍然比电压力锅贵。纵向比较突出了肯尼亚燃料价格的动态性质,以及家庭成本最优的烹饪堆栈如何在短时间内发生变化。这些研究结果表明,相对负担能力在时间和空间上都存在差异,并可能受到更广泛的市场和政策激励的严重影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信