Clinical and pathological outcomes of deferred nephrectomy in patients with metastatic and locally advanced RCC after immune checkpoint inhibitors.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf004
Paulo S do Amaral, Kathryn E Beckermann, Jennifer B Gordetsky, Sam S Chang, Daniel D Joyce, Kerry Schaffer, Amy N Luckenbaugh, Morgan A Lambrecht, Elizabeth G Ryan, Daniel A Barocas, Kelvin A Moses, Brian I Rini
{"title":"Clinical and pathological outcomes of deferred nephrectomy in patients with metastatic and locally advanced RCC after immune checkpoint inhibitors.","authors":"Paulo S do Amaral, Kathryn E Beckermann, Jennifer B Gordetsky, Sam S Chang, Daniel D Joyce, Kerry Schaffer, Amy N Luckenbaugh, Morgan A Lambrecht, Elizabeth G Ryan, Daniel A Barocas, Kelvin A Moses, Brian I Rini","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Cytoreductive nephrectomy following immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma remains controversial, with limited data on its clinical and pathological outcomes. This study evaluated the outcomes of patients undergoing deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy (dCN) after ICB-based treatment, focusing on the radiologic and pathological responses, and postoperative clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 24 patients with metastatic or locally advanced RCC who underwent dCN after ICB at a single institution between April 2018 and May 2024. We assessed the radiological response to ICB, pathological findings (presence and extent of necrosis) in resected primary tumors, and postoperative clinical outcomes, including the rate of patients without measurable disease and those who discontinued systemic therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median ICB exposure prior to surgery was 11.3 months. Radiologically, 67% of patients had partial response, 29% had stable disease, and 4% had a complete response. Pathology showed 96% of specimens with necrosis, 21% of specimens showing no residual disease (pT0), and 21% exhibiting ≥95% necrosis. Postoperatively, 50% of patients had nonmeasurable disease of first follow-up scans, and 54% discontinued systemic therapy, with 9 patients remaining on surveillance at last follow-up. Limitations include the small sample size and retrospective design.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deferred CN following ICB therapy is feasible. Extensive necrosis in the resected surgical specimen after ICB-based therapy requires further investigation as a prognostic marker for durable responses off systemic therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":"30 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Cytoreductive nephrectomy following immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma remains controversial, with limited data on its clinical and pathological outcomes. This study evaluated the outcomes of patients undergoing deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy (dCN) after ICB-based treatment, focusing on the radiologic and pathological responses, and postoperative clinical outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 24 patients with metastatic or locally advanced RCC who underwent dCN after ICB at a single institution between April 2018 and May 2024. We assessed the radiological response to ICB, pathological findings (presence and extent of necrosis) in resected primary tumors, and postoperative clinical outcomes, including the rate of patients without measurable disease and those who discontinued systemic therapy.

Results: Median ICB exposure prior to surgery was 11.3 months. Radiologically, 67% of patients had partial response, 29% had stable disease, and 4% had a complete response. Pathology showed 96% of specimens with necrosis, 21% of specimens showing no residual disease (pT0), and 21% exhibiting ≥95% necrosis. Postoperatively, 50% of patients had nonmeasurable disease of first follow-up scans, and 54% discontinued systemic therapy, with 9 patients remaining on surveillance at last follow-up. Limitations include the small sample size and retrospective design.

Conclusion: Deferred CN following ICB therapy is feasible. Extensive necrosis in the resected surgical specimen after ICB-based therapy requires further investigation as a prognostic marker for durable responses off systemic therapy.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信