Xing Chen, Xiaodan Tan, Zhe Peng, Xiaoli Wang, Wenjia Guo, Dan Li, Yang Yang, Duanfang Zhou, Lin Chen
{"title":"Biomarkers and potential function analysis of triple-negative breast cancer screening based on bioinformatics.","authors":"Xing Chen, Xiaodan Tan, Zhe Peng, Xiaoli Wang, Wenjia Guo, Dan Li, Yang Yang, Duanfang Zhou, Lin Chen","doi":"10.1177/18758592241308738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to identify and validate potential endogenous biomarkers for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). TNBC microarray data (GSE38959, GSE53752) were retrieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, and principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to evaluate the reliability of the data. The microarray datasets were merged, and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using R software. Functional enrichment analysis of the DEGs was conducted using Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways. The most disease-relevant module was identified through Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA), and genes within this module were intersected with the DEGs. The intersecting genes underwent Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression analysis to minimize errors and identify TNBC-specific genes. Sensitivity and survival analyses were performed on the identified specific genes. There were 10 TNBC-specific genes identified: RRM2, DEPDC1, FIGF, TACC3, E2F1, CDO1, DST, MCM4, CHEK1, and PLSCR4. RT-qPCR analysis showed significant upregulation of CDO1, MCM4, DEPDC1, RRM2, and E2F1 in MDA-MB-231, CAL-148, and MFM-223 compared to MCF-10A. Our findings provide new insights into TNBC pathogenesis and potential therapeutic strategies, with important clinical implications for further understanding TNBC mechanisms and developing innovative treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":56320,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Biomarkers","volume":"42 2","pages":"18758592241308738"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18758592241308738","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aims to identify and validate potential endogenous biomarkers for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). TNBC microarray data (GSE38959, GSE53752) were retrieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, and principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to evaluate the reliability of the data. The microarray datasets were merged, and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using R software. Functional enrichment analysis of the DEGs was conducted using Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways. The most disease-relevant module was identified through Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA), and genes within this module were intersected with the DEGs. The intersecting genes underwent Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression analysis to minimize errors and identify TNBC-specific genes. Sensitivity and survival analyses were performed on the identified specific genes. There were 10 TNBC-specific genes identified: RRM2, DEPDC1, FIGF, TACC3, E2F1, CDO1, DST, MCM4, CHEK1, and PLSCR4. RT-qPCR analysis showed significant upregulation of CDO1, MCM4, DEPDC1, RRM2, and E2F1 in MDA-MB-231, CAL-148, and MFM-223 compared to MCF-10A. Our findings provide new insights into TNBC pathogenesis and potential therapeutic strategies, with important clinical implications for further understanding TNBC mechanisms and developing innovative treatments.
期刊介绍:
Concentrating on molecular biomarkers in cancer research, Cancer Biomarkers publishes original research findings (and reviews solicited by the editor) on the subject of the identification of markers associated with the disease processes whether or not they are an integral part of the pathological lesion.
The disease markers may include, but are not limited to, genomic, epigenomic, proteomics, cellular and morphologic, and genetic factors predisposing to the disease or indicating the occurrence of the disease. Manuscripts on these factors or biomarkers, either in altered forms, abnormal concentrations or with abnormal tissue distribution leading to disease causation will be accepted.