Maria C Alzamora, Lindsey N Valentine, Megan R Billow
{"title":"Womb for debate: the complexities of early-age hysterectomies.","authors":"Maria C Alzamora, Lindsey N Valentine, Megan R Billow","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000001031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Hysterectomy remains one of the most performed gynecologic procedures, yet its application in young and nulliparous individuals raises complex ethical, medical, and psychosocial considerations. As early detection of gynecologic conditions improves, requests for hysterectomy at younger ages may increase. This review examines the current literature on the morbidity, quality of life, psychological impact, and social implications of hysterectomy in younger patients.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Research indicates both benefits and risks associated with early-age hysterectomy. While it provides significant symptom relief for conditions such as chronic pelvic pain, endometriosis, and fibroids, studies also suggest an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders, and psychological distress. Younger patients may experience residual symptoms and identity disruption, particularly in relation to fertility loss. While regret appears to be low in the short term, long-term data on patient satisfaction remain limited. In addition, hysterectomy plays a critical role in gender-affirming care, highlighting the need for individualized counseling.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Gynecology providers must engage in shared decision-making, providing evidence-based counseling on the benefits, risks, and alternatives to hysterectomy. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, particularly in younger and nulliparous patients, to guide best practices and optimize patient-centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000001031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: Hysterectomy remains one of the most performed gynecologic procedures, yet its application in young and nulliparous individuals raises complex ethical, medical, and psychosocial considerations. As early detection of gynecologic conditions improves, requests for hysterectomy at younger ages may increase. This review examines the current literature on the morbidity, quality of life, psychological impact, and social implications of hysterectomy in younger patients.
Recent findings: Research indicates both benefits and risks associated with early-age hysterectomy. While it provides significant symptom relief for conditions such as chronic pelvic pain, endometriosis, and fibroids, studies also suggest an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders, and psychological distress. Younger patients may experience residual symptoms and identity disruption, particularly in relation to fertility loss. While regret appears to be low in the short term, long-term data on patient satisfaction remain limited. In addition, hysterectomy plays a critical role in gender-affirming care, highlighting the need for individualized counseling.
Summary: Gynecology providers must engage in shared decision-making, providing evidence-based counseling on the benefits, risks, and alternatives to hysterectomy. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, particularly in younger and nulliparous patients, to guide best practices and optimize patient-centered care.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With eleven disciplines published across the year – including reproductive endocrinology, gynecologic cancer and fertility– every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.