Evaluation of mid-career nurses' participation in the workshop "Scientific Meaning of Clinical Practice"-challenges and prospects of research support in A prefecture.

Kouichi Yoshimura, Hirohito Nanbu
{"title":"Evaluation of mid-career nurses' participation in the workshop \"Scientific Meaning of Clinical Practice\"-challenges and prospects of research support in A prefecture.","authors":"Kouichi Yoshimura, Hirohito Nanbu","doi":"10.2185/jrm.2024-023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we aimed to evaluate the \"Scientific Meaning of Clinical Practice Workshop\" held at the Wakayama Nursing Practice Research Center and clarify its effects and future tasks.</p><p><strong>Participants and methods: </strong>Based on what nurses currently find beneficial and problematic about their research, we conducted a survey using a self-administered questionnaire among the nurses who participated in the workshop. The questionnaire was processed using Microsoft Forms. Eight of the nine clinical nurses who participated in the workshop participated in this study. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tokyo Healthcare University. The participants provided written confirmation of their cooperation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six categories were generated to demonstrate the effects and future tasks of the workshop. Several challenges faced by the participants were highlighted, including difficulties in determining research directions and managing time constraints. However, the workshop notably enhanced the participants' comprehension of nursing research and positively shifted their attitudes toward it. Other benefits, such as improved research skills and the ability to apply research findings to clinical practice, were also noted. The workshop underscored the value of peer support in fostering interest in nursing research and addressing common obstacles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings reveal the importance of continuous education and support mechanisms for clinical nurses to overcome barriers and enhance their research capabilities. Future workshops should consider participants' needs for learning about research methods and ethics.</p>","PeriodicalId":73939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rural medicine : JRM","volume":"20 2","pages":"138-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11962195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rural medicine : JRM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2185/jrm.2024-023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the "Scientific Meaning of Clinical Practice Workshop" held at the Wakayama Nursing Practice Research Center and clarify its effects and future tasks.

Participants and methods: Based on what nurses currently find beneficial and problematic about their research, we conducted a survey using a self-administered questionnaire among the nurses who participated in the workshop. The questionnaire was processed using Microsoft Forms. Eight of the nine clinical nurses who participated in the workshop participated in this study. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tokyo Healthcare University. The participants provided written confirmation of their cooperation.

Results: Six categories were generated to demonstrate the effects and future tasks of the workshop. Several challenges faced by the participants were highlighted, including difficulties in determining research directions and managing time constraints. However, the workshop notably enhanced the participants' comprehension of nursing research and positively shifted their attitudes toward it. Other benefits, such as improved research skills and the ability to apply research findings to clinical practice, were also noted. The workshop underscored the value of peer support in fostering interest in nursing research and addressing common obstacles.

Conclusion: These findings reveal the importance of continuous education and support mechanisms for clinical nurses to overcome barriers and enhance their research capabilities. Future workshops should consider participants' needs for learning about research methods and ethics.

职业生涯中期护士参加 "临床实践的科学意义 "研讨会的评估--A 县研究支持的挑战和前景。
目的:本研究旨在评估和歌山护理实践研究中心举办的“临床实践研讨会的科学意义”,并阐明其效果和未来的任务。参与者和方法:基于护士目前发现的有益和有问题的研究,我们对参加研讨会的护士进行了一项自我管理的问卷调查。问卷使用Microsoft Forms进行处理。参加研习班的9名临床护士中有8名参加了本研究。本研究经东京保健大学伦理委员会批准。与会代表提供了书面合作确认书。结果:产生了六个类别来展示研讨会的效果和未来的任务。与会者强调了他们面临的一些挑战,包括确定研究方向和管理时间限制方面的困难。然而,研讨会显著提高了参与者对护理研究的理解,并积极转变了他们对护理研究的态度。其他好处,如提高研究技能和将研究成果应用于临床实践的能力,也被注意到。研讨会强调了同伴支持在促进护理研究兴趣和解决共同障碍方面的价值。结论:这些发现揭示了继续教育和支持机制对临床护士克服障碍、提高科研能力的重要性。未来的研讨会应考虑参与者对学习研究方法和伦理的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信