Trends in Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder.

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sumedha Gupta, Aditya James, Jennifer Miles, Hillary Samples, Stephen Crystal, Kosali Simon
{"title":"Trends in Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder.","authors":"Sumedha Gupta, Aditya James, Jennifer Miles, Hillary Samples, Stephen Crystal, Kosali Simon","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Medicaid, the largest payer for medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), disenrolled more than 19.1 million individuals by March 2024 after the continuous coverage requirement ended in April 2023-a process termed Medicaid unwinding-but the impact on buprenorphine receipt remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association between Medicaid unwinding and dispensing of prescription buprenorphine, overall and by payment sources nationally and by state.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Cross-sectional study of buprenorphine dispensing (age ≥18 years) from April 2020 to March 2024 using the IQVIA Longitudinal Prescription (LRx) database containing more than 90% of US retail pharmacy claims. Interrupted time-series estimated levels and trends of buprenorphine prescription dispensation before and after Medicaid unwinding.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The number of patients with filled buprenorphine prescriptions each month was analyzed by payer type (Medicaid, Medicare, commercial, or self-pay) and by state. Stratified analyses assessed state factors, including automated (ex parte) Medicaid renewal rates (higher or lower than the median), income verification sources used for automated renewals (≤3, 4-5, or 6-7), and Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2 405 970 adults who filled buprenorphine prescriptions between April 2020 and March 2024, 1 154 866 (48%) had at least 1 fill covered by Medicaid, 288 716 (12%) by Medicare, 1 106 746 (46%) by commercial insurance, and 264 657 (11%) by self-pay. Medicaid unwinding was associated with reversal of previously increasing trends in buprenorphine prescriptions, with 2.9% fewer patients (-23 855 [95% CI, -32 661 to -15 054]) receiving buprenorphine each month by 8 months after unwinding vs the month before unwinding began. This decline was driven by a 12.7% drop in patients with Medicaid-paid fills (-46 545 [95% CI, -51 362 to -41 730]), partially offset by increases in patients with commercial (6.12%, 19 809 [95% CI, 12 109 to 27 509]) and self-paid (7.24%, 2525 [95% CI, 1246 to 3805]) fills. Sixteen states saw overall declines in buprenorphine use after unwinding, with reductions among patients with Medicaid-covered prescriptions in 36 states, partially offset by increases in patients with commercial insurance covered fills (32 states) and self-paid fills (23 states). Buprenorphine prescriptions remained stable in states with above-median automated Medicaid renewal rates and more income verification sources, whereas states with below-median automated renewal rates, fewer verification sources, and nonexpansion state status experienced smaller offsets for Medicaid-related losses, highlighting importance of state-specific policies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cross-sectional study of Medicaid unwinding and filled buprenorphine prescriptions found that although shifts to commercial and self-pay sources mitigated some losses, rising self-pay reliance poses affordability barriers that threaten treatment continuity. Addressing access disparities is critical amid persistently high US overdose rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 4","pages":"e250393"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Medicaid, the largest payer for medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), disenrolled more than 19.1 million individuals by March 2024 after the continuous coverage requirement ended in April 2023-a process termed Medicaid unwinding-but the impact on buprenorphine receipt remains unknown.

Objective: To assess the association between Medicaid unwinding and dispensing of prescription buprenorphine, overall and by payment sources nationally and by state.

Design, setting, and participants: Cross-sectional study of buprenorphine dispensing (age ≥18 years) from April 2020 to March 2024 using the IQVIA Longitudinal Prescription (LRx) database containing more than 90% of US retail pharmacy claims. Interrupted time-series estimated levels and trends of buprenorphine prescription dispensation before and after Medicaid unwinding.

Main outcomes and measures: The number of patients with filled buprenorphine prescriptions each month was analyzed by payer type (Medicaid, Medicare, commercial, or self-pay) and by state. Stratified analyses assessed state factors, including automated (ex parte) Medicaid renewal rates (higher or lower than the median), income verification sources used for automated renewals (≤3, 4-5, or 6-7), and Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion status.

Results: Of the 2 405 970 adults who filled buprenorphine prescriptions between April 2020 and March 2024, 1 154 866 (48%) had at least 1 fill covered by Medicaid, 288 716 (12%) by Medicare, 1 106 746 (46%) by commercial insurance, and 264 657 (11%) by self-pay. Medicaid unwinding was associated with reversal of previously increasing trends in buprenorphine prescriptions, with 2.9% fewer patients (-23 855 [95% CI, -32 661 to -15 054]) receiving buprenorphine each month by 8 months after unwinding vs the month before unwinding began. This decline was driven by a 12.7% drop in patients with Medicaid-paid fills (-46 545 [95% CI, -51 362 to -41 730]), partially offset by increases in patients with commercial (6.12%, 19 809 [95% CI, 12 109 to 27 509]) and self-paid (7.24%, 2525 [95% CI, 1246 to 3805]) fills. Sixteen states saw overall declines in buprenorphine use after unwinding, with reductions among patients with Medicaid-covered prescriptions in 36 states, partially offset by increases in patients with commercial insurance covered fills (32 states) and self-paid fills (23 states). Buprenorphine prescriptions remained stable in states with above-median automated Medicaid renewal rates and more income verification sources, whereas states with below-median automated renewal rates, fewer verification sources, and nonexpansion state status experienced smaller offsets for Medicaid-related losses, highlighting importance of state-specific policies.

Conclusions and relevance: This cross-sectional study of Medicaid unwinding and filled buprenorphine prescriptions found that although shifts to commercial and self-pay sources mitigated some losses, rising self-pay reliance poses affordability barriers that threaten treatment continuity. Addressing access disparities is critical amid persistently high US overdose rates.

重要性:医疗补助计划(Medicaid)是阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)治疗药物的最大支付方,在 2023 年 4 月持续覆盖要求结束后,到 2024 年 3 月将有超过 1910 万人退出该计划--这一过程被称为医疗补助计划的解除--但其对丁丙诺啡接收的影响仍不得而知:目的:评估医疗补助计划解除与处方丁丙诺啡配药之间的关系,包括全国和各州的总体情况和支付来源:使用 IQVIA Longitudinal Prescription (LRx) 数据库对 2020 年 4 月至 2024 年 3 月期间的丁丙诺啡配药情况(年龄≥18 岁)进行横断面研究,该数据库包含 90% 以上的美国零售药店报销单。通过中断时间序列估算了医疗补助计划解除前后丁丙诺啡处方配药的水平和趋势:按支付方类型(医疗补助、医疗保险、商业或自费)和州对每月开具丁丙诺啡处方的患者人数进行了分析。分层分析评估了各州的因素,包括自动(单方)医疗补助续保率(高于或低于中位数)、自动续保所使用的收入验证来源(≤3、4-5 或 6-7)以及《平价医疗法案》医疗补助扩展状况:在 2020 年 4 月至 2024 年 3 月期间开具丁丙诺啡处方的 2 405 970 名成人中,有 1 154 866 人(48%)至少有一次开具的处方由医疗补助计划承保,288 716 人(12%)由医疗保险计划承保,1 106 746 人(46%)由商业保险承保,264 657 人(11%)由自费承保。取消医疗补助与之前丁丙诺啡处方增加趋势的逆转有关,取消医疗补助 8 个月后,每月接受丁丙诺啡治疗的患者比开始取消医疗补助前减少了 2.9% (-23 855 [95% CI, -32 661 to -15 054])。这一下降的原因是医疗补助支付的患者数量下降了 12.7%(-46 545 [95% CI,-51 362 至-41 730]),而商业支付(6.12%,19 809 [95% CI,12 109 至 27 509])和自费支付(7.24%,2525 [95% CI,1246 至 3805])患者数量的增加部分抵消了这一下降。有 16 个州的丁丙诺啡使用量在解除捆绑后出现总体下降,其中有 36 个州的医疗补助处方患者使用量下降,但商业保险处方患者(32 个州)和自费处方患者(23 个州)使用量的增加部分抵消了下降趋势。在医疗补助计划自动续保率高于中位数、收入核查来源较多的州,丁丙诺啡处方保持稳定,而自动续保率低于中位数、核查来源较少以及未扩大州地位的州,与医疗补助计划相关的损失抵消较小,这凸显了各州特定政策的重要性:这项关于医疗补助计划的解除和已开具的丁丙诺啡处方的横断面研究发现,虽然向商业和自费来源的转移减轻了一些损失,但对自费的依赖性不断提高造成了负担能力障碍,威胁到治疗的连续性。在美国用药过量率居高不下的情况下,解决用药不均的问题至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信