Perceptions and Intentions to Prevent Diabetes Among At-Risk Individuals: A Qualitative Study Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Jun Yi Claire Teo, Ying Jiang, Cheun Wei Alvin Seah, Tin Mei Yeo, Suan Tee Lim, Wenru Wang
{"title":"Perceptions and Intentions to Prevent Diabetes Among At-Risk Individuals: A Qualitative Study Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour.","authors":"Jun Yi Claire Teo, Ying Jiang, Cheun Wei Alvin Seah, Tin Mei Yeo, Suan Tee Lim, Wenru Wang","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the perceptions and factors that influence intentions to prevent diabetes among at-risk individuals.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A descriptive qualitative study design was used. The Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist guided the presentation of findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine focus groups, including 47 individuals at risk of diabetes from the community in Singapore, were interviewed from April 2023 to January 2024. The semi-structured guide was developed on the basis of the theory of planned behaviour and validated by two content experts. Focus group interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using Hsieh and Shannon's content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six main categories emerged from the data analysis. Individual's perceptions of diabetes were associated with excessive sugar, and prediabetes a warning sign of impending diabetes. Participants were knowledgeable about the risk factors of diabetes but needed more actionable information. They also perceived that more awareness of diabetes is necessary. Participants' attitudes towards diabetes were individualistic, dependent on their sense of vulnerability and individual personalities. The subjective norms that influenced their behaviours were socio-cultural in nature. The main barriers impeding diabetes prevention were their commitment and responsibilities to family and work, accessibility to healthier lifestyle practices and internal struggles with the tediousness of diabetes prevention behaviours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To improve intentions to engage in diabetes prevention, a diabetes prevention programme needs to be hosted on a culturally appropriate mHealth platform for groups of like-minded individuals at risk of diabetes and their family and friends.</p><p><strong>Implications for nurses: </strong>Nurses possess the necessary skills and experience to develop and deliver diabetes prevention programmes, create awareness of existing government initiatives and resources, and improve chronic disease management in the clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Members of the public assisted in recruitment. They also engaged in focus group discussions and provided the insights necessary for this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17764","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To explore the perceptions and factors that influence intentions to prevent diabetes among at-risk individuals.

Design: A descriptive qualitative study design was used. The Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist guided the presentation of findings.

Methods: Nine focus groups, including 47 individuals at risk of diabetes from the community in Singapore, were interviewed from April 2023 to January 2024. The semi-structured guide was developed on the basis of the theory of planned behaviour and validated by two content experts. Focus group interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using Hsieh and Shannon's content analysis.

Results: Six main categories emerged from the data analysis. Individual's perceptions of diabetes were associated with excessive sugar, and prediabetes a warning sign of impending diabetes. Participants were knowledgeable about the risk factors of diabetes but needed more actionable information. They also perceived that more awareness of diabetes is necessary. Participants' attitudes towards diabetes were individualistic, dependent on their sense of vulnerability and individual personalities. The subjective norms that influenced their behaviours were socio-cultural in nature. The main barriers impeding diabetes prevention were their commitment and responsibilities to family and work, accessibility to healthier lifestyle practices and internal struggles with the tediousness of diabetes prevention behaviours.

Conclusion: To improve intentions to engage in diabetes prevention, a diabetes prevention programme needs to be hosted on a culturally appropriate mHealth platform for groups of like-minded individuals at risk of diabetes and their family and friends.

Implications for nurses: Nurses possess the necessary skills and experience to develop and deliver diabetes prevention programmes, create awareness of existing government initiatives and resources, and improve chronic disease management in the clinical setting.

Patient or public contribution: Members of the public assisted in recruitment. They also engaged in focus group discussions and provided the insights necessary for this study.

高危人群预防糖尿病的认知和意图:一项使用计划行为理论的定性研究。
目的:探讨影响高危人群预防糖尿病意愿的认知和因素。设计:采用描述性定性研究设计。报告定性研究的综合标准(COREQ)核对表指导了结果的介绍。方法:从2023年4月至2024年1月,对9个焦点小组进行了访谈,其中包括来自新加坡社区的47名有糖尿病风险的个体。半结构化指南是在计划行为理论的基础上开发的,并由两位内容专家进行了验证。焦点小组访谈录音,逐字转录,并使用Hsieh和Shannon的内容分析进行分析。结果:从数据分析中得出六个主要类别。个人对糖尿病的感知与过量的糖有关,而糖尿病前期是即将发生糖尿病的警告信号。参与者了解糖尿病的危险因素,但需要更多可操作的信息。他们还认为,提高对糖尿病的认识是必要的。参与者对糖尿病的态度是个人主义的,取决于他们的脆弱感和个性。影响其行为的主观规范本质上是社会文化的。阻碍糖尿病预防的主要障碍是他们对家庭和工作的承诺和责任,获得更健康的生活方式的机会,以及与糖尿病预防行为的单调乏味的内心斗争。结论:为了提高参与糖尿病预防的意愿,需要在一个文化上合适的移动健康平台上为有糖尿病风险的志同道合的个人及其家人和朋友举办糖尿病预防项目。对护士的启示:护士拥有必要的技能和经验来制定和实施糖尿病预防计划,提高对现有政府倡议和资源的认识,并在临床环境中改善慢性病管理。患者或公众贡献:公众协助招募。他们还参与了焦点小组讨论,并为本研究提供了必要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信