Health system-led early consent and direct contact of at-risk relatives: Pilot study results.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Nora B Henrikson, Aaron Scrol, Jamilyn M Zepp, Melissa L Anderson, Paula R Blasi, John J Ewing, Jane Grafton, James D Ralston, Stephanie M Fullerton, Kathleen A Leppig
{"title":"Health system-led early consent and direct contact of at-risk relatives: Pilot study results.","authors":"Nora B Henrikson, Aaron Scrol, Jamilyn M Zepp, Melissa L Anderson, Paula R Blasi, John J Ewing, Jane Grafton, James D Ralston, Stephanie M Fullerton, Kathleen A Leppig","doi":"10.1159/000545404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>At-risk relatives of probands with genetic variants associated with hereditary cancer risk should receive cascade genetic testing. In the U.S., probands are expected to notify their own at-risk relatives, but many relatives never learn of their risk, representing missed opportunity to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with hereditary cancers. Direct contact of relatives could reach relatives not contacted by the proband. We conducted a single-arm, prospective pilot evaluation of a direct contact intervention based on patient and family preferences. Here we report the study's quantitative results, measured by proband and relative participation in the intervention follow-up survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited adults receiving genetic counseling for inherited cancer risk at one U.S. integrated health system. A genetic counselor offered to contact at-risk relatives. We surveyed probands and relatives at study enrollment and 6-8 weeks and evaluated administrative data to assess the program's outreach to probands and relatives, its acceptability, and its limited efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We approached 148 probands before their genetic counseling appointment. 55 (37%) consented to study participation. Of these, 31 completed genetic testing, 29 of whom provided consent to contact 101 relatives. 44% (n=45) of relatives consented to be contacted by the study genetic counselor. Acceptability was high for both groups and no harms were reported. All relatives reached (n=43) received their proband's test results, including 6 pathogenic/likely pathogenic findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A direct contact program was acceptable, reached at-risk relatives and communicated proband test results. Direct contact with early consent of relatives holds promise for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":49650,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Genomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: At-risk relatives of probands with genetic variants associated with hereditary cancer risk should receive cascade genetic testing. In the U.S., probands are expected to notify their own at-risk relatives, but many relatives never learn of their risk, representing missed opportunity to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with hereditary cancers. Direct contact of relatives could reach relatives not contacted by the proband. We conducted a single-arm, prospective pilot evaluation of a direct contact intervention based on patient and family preferences. Here we report the study's quantitative results, measured by proband and relative participation in the intervention follow-up survey.

Methods: We recruited adults receiving genetic counseling for inherited cancer risk at one U.S. integrated health system. A genetic counselor offered to contact at-risk relatives. We surveyed probands and relatives at study enrollment and 6-8 weeks and evaluated administrative data to assess the program's outreach to probands and relatives, its acceptability, and its limited efficacy.

Results: We approached 148 probands before their genetic counseling appointment. 55 (37%) consented to study participation. Of these, 31 completed genetic testing, 29 of whom provided consent to contact 101 relatives. 44% (n=45) of relatives consented to be contacted by the study genetic counselor. Acceptability was high for both groups and no harms were reported. All relatives reached (n=43) received their proband's test results, including 6 pathogenic/likely pathogenic findings.

Conclusion: A direct contact program was acceptable, reached at-risk relatives and communicated proband test results. Direct contact with early consent of relatives holds promise for future research.

卫生系统主导的早期同意和直接联系高危亲属:试点研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Genomics
Public Health Genomics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Public Health Genomics'' is the leading international journal focusing on the timely translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies into public health, health policies, and healthcare as a whole. This peer-reviewed journal is a bimonthly forum featuring original papers, reviews, short communications, and policy statements. It is supplemented by topic-specific issues providing a comprehensive, holistic and ''all-inclusive'' picture of the chosen subject. Multidisciplinary in scope, it combines theoretical and empirical work from a range of disciplines, notably public health, molecular and medical sciences, the humanities and social sciences. In so doing, it also takes into account rapid scientific advances from fields such as systems biology, microbiomics, epigenomics or information and communication technologies as well as the hight potential of ''big data'' for public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信