AI and Expert Medical Evidence.

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01
David Ranson
{"title":"AI and Expert Medical Evidence.","authors":"David Ranson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Courts and legal processes are being challenged by the increasing utilisation of artificial intelligence (AI) applications. At the same time practitioners in many disciplines involved in providing expert evidence are increasingly using artificial intelligence tools in their investigations, examinations and analysis. These technologies, while increasingly of value in analytical techniques including interpretation and diagnostics, raise significant challenges for the legal system charged with evaluating, reviewing and testing expert opinion evidence. At a simple level, is it possible to distinguish between the evidence of an expert that is based purely on their knowledge and expertise and evidence they may give which is based to a variable degree on an analysis undertaken by an artificial intelligence-like expert system? This challenge is not new; medical practitioners have used information technology systems to enhance diagnostic and therapeutic processes for decades, yet these have rarely been subject to detailed challenge in court. With the rise in AI applications this may well change, especially in some of the areas where AI systems seem to offer increased diagnostic accuracy to that of medical experts.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"31 4","pages":"675-681"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Courts and legal processes are being challenged by the increasing utilisation of artificial intelligence (AI) applications. At the same time practitioners in many disciplines involved in providing expert evidence are increasingly using artificial intelligence tools in their investigations, examinations and analysis. These technologies, while increasingly of value in analytical techniques including interpretation and diagnostics, raise significant challenges for the legal system charged with evaluating, reviewing and testing expert opinion evidence. At a simple level, is it possible to distinguish between the evidence of an expert that is based purely on their knowledge and expertise and evidence they may give which is based to a variable degree on an analysis undertaken by an artificial intelligence-like expert system? This challenge is not new; medical practitioners have used information technology systems to enhance diagnostic and therapeutic processes for decades, yet these have rarely been subject to detailed challenge in court. With the rise in AI applications this may well change, especially in some of the areas where AI systems seem to offer increased diagnostic accuracy to that of medical experts.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信