AI and Expert Medical Evidence.

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01
David Ranson
{"title":"AI and Expert Medical Evidence.","authors":"David Ranson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Courts and legal processes are being challenged by the increasing utilisation of artificial intelligence (AI) applications. At the same time practitioners in many disciplines involved in providing expert evidence are increasingly using artificial intelligence tools in their investigations, examinations and analysis. These technologies, while increasingly of value in analytical techniques including interpretation and diagnostics, raise significant challenges for the legal system charged with evaluating, reviewing and testing expert opinion evidence. At a simple level, is it possible to distinguish between the evidence of an expert that is based purely on their knowledge and expertise and evidence they may give which is based to a variable degree on an analysis undertaken by an artificial intelligence-like expert system? This challenge is not new; medical practitioners have used information technology systems to enhance diagnostic and therapeutic processes for decades, yet these have rarely been subject to detailed challenge in court. With the rise in AI applications this may well change, especially in some of the areas where AI systems seem to offer increased diagnostic accuracy to that of medical experts.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"31 4","pages":"675-681"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Courts and legal processes are being challenged by the increasing utilisation of artificial intelligence (AI) applications. At the same time practitioners in many disciplines involved in providing expert evidence are increasingly using artificial intelligence tools in their investigations, examinations and analysis. These technologies, while increasingly of value in analytical techniques including interpretation and diagnostics, raise significant challenges for the legal system charged with evaluating, reviewing and testing expert opinion evidence. At a simple level, is it possible to distinguish between the evidence of an expert that is based purely on their knowledge and expertise and evidence they may give which is based to a variable degree on an analysis undertaken by an artificial intelligence-like expert system? This challenge is not new; medical practitioners have used information technology systems to enhance diagnostic and therapeutic processes for decades, yet these have rarely been subject to detailed challenge in court. With the rise in AI applications this may well change, especially in some of the areas where AI systems seem to offer increased diagnostic accuracy to that of medical experts.

人工智能和专家医学证据。
人工智能(AI)应用程序的日益普及对法院和法律程序构成了挑战。与此同时,在提供专家证据的许多学科中,从业者越来越多地在调查、检查和分析中使用人工智能工具。这些技术虽然在分析技术(包括解释和诊断)中越来越有价值,但对负责评估、审查和测试专家意见证据的法律体系提出了重大挑战。在一个简单的层面上,是否有可能区分纯粹基于他们的知识和专业知识的专家的证据,以及他们可能提供的基于人工智能类专家系统进行的不同程度的分析的证据?这一挑战并不新鲜;几十年来,医疗从业者已经使用信息技术系统来提高诊断和治疗过程,但这些很少受到法庭上的详细挑战。随着人工智能应用的兴起,这种情况可能会发生变化,尤其是在某些领域,人工智能系统似乎比医学专家提供了更高的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信