{"title":"Análisis de los indicadores de seguridad del paciente en las complicaciones por cuidados durante la hospitalización","authors":"F.M. Escandell Rico , L. Pérez Fernández","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To Analyze AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators (PSI) obtained through the Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) in improving patient safety.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Observational descriptive and retroprective study. The CMBD hospital discharge registry of 342 hospitals of the National Health System was included. The MBDS indicators and analysis axes were from 2021 and the hospitalization MBDS information included the following general data: total discharges, average stay, average age and % mortality. Four patient safety indicators were analyzed: Pressure ulcers (PSI 03), Iatrogenic pneumothorax (PSI 06), Accidental puncture or tear in adults (PSI 15) and CVC-related to bloodstream infection (PSI 07).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The PSI 06 and PSI 07 categories not only have a higher number of discharges, but also a longer average stay and mortality. In comparison, PSI 03 and PSI 15 categories show a much lower number of discharges, and a lower mortality and average stay. Conditions associated with PSI 06 and PSI 07 categories could be more severe or complex, leading to a longer hospital stay and a higher risk of mortality. According to relative risk analyses, all indicators show a slightly higher mortality risk in men than in women.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Advanced age and serious diagnoses, such as circulatory diseases or neoplasia, are associated with higher mortality and hospital stay. In relation to hospital size, smaller ones show higher risks and worse mortality outcomes. Therefore, these results could guide strategies to optimize resources and focus interventions on the most vulnerable groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":"40 3","pages":"Article 101116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647925000211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To Analyze AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators (PSI) obtained through the Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) in improving patient safety.
Method
Observational descriptive and retroprective study. The CMBD hospital discharge registry of 342 hospitals of the National Health System was included. The MBDS indicators and analysis axes were from 2021 and the hospitalization MBDS information included the following general data: total discharges, average stay, average age and % mortality. Four patient safety indicators were analyzed: Pressure ulcers (PSI 03), Iatrogenic pneumothorax (PSI 06), Accidental puncture or tear in adults (PSI 15) and CVC-related to bloodstream infection (PSI 07).
Results
The PSI 06 and PSI 07 categories not only have a higher number of discharges, but also a longer average stay and mortality. In comparison, PSI 03 and PSI 15 categories show a much lower number of discharges, and a lower mortality and average stay. Conditions associated with PSI 06 and PSI 07 categories could be more severe or complex, leading to a longer hospital stay and a higher risk of mortality. According to relative risk analyses, all indicators show a slightly higher mortality risk in men than in women.
Conclusions
Advanced age and serious diagnoses, such as circulatory diseases or neoplasia, are associated with higher mortality and hospital stay. In relation to hospital size, smaller ones show higher risks and worse mortality outcomes. Therefore, these results could guide strategies to optimize resources and focus interventions on the most vulnerable groups.
期刊介绍:
Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)