Vladan Bernard, Erik Staffa, Jana Pokorná, Adam Šimo
{"title":"Assessing detector stability and image quality of thermal cameras on smartphones for medical applications: a comparative study.","authors":"Vladan Bernard, Erik Staffa, Jana Pokorná, Adam Šimo","doi":"10.1007/s11517-025-03348-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Infrared thermography (IRT) has gained significant interest in medical applications for its potential in diagnosing various conditions. Smartphone-based IRT modules offer portability and affordability, leading to increased utilization in medical settings. However, differences in performance among these modules raise questions about their reliability for medical use.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study compared three smartphone-based IRT modules (SmartIRT-Hikmicro, FLIR One Pro, and Seek Thermal CompactPRO-which, according to their datasheets, exhibit comparable quality and parameters. Temperature stability, surface temperature of the body, and spatial uniformity of provided images were assessed using calibrated black body measurements and surface temperature monitoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Hikmicro module exhibited the most stable temperature readings, while FLIR One Pro showed the highest temperature increase over time. Seek Thermal CompactPRO demonstrated relatively better spatial uniformity. However, discrepancies in image resolution were noted, with FLIR One and Seek modules modifying image sizes through post-processing algorithms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While SmartIRT modules offer affordability and portability, their performance varies significantly. Temporal stability emerges as a critical factor, with the Hikmicro module demonstrating leadership in this aspect. Careful consideration and validation are necessary when selecting and utilizing SmartIRT modules for medical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49840,"journal":{"name":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-025-03348-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Infrared thermography (IRT) has gained significant interest in medical applications for its potential in diagnosing various conditions. Smartphone-based IRT modules offer portability and affordability, leading to increased utilization in medical settings. However, differences in performance among these modules raise questions about their reliability for medical use.
Materials and methods: This study compared three smartphone-based IRT modules (SmartIRT-Hikmicro, FLIR One Pro, and Seek Thermal CompactPRO-which, according to their datasheets, exhibit comparable quality and parameters. Temperature stability, surface temperature of the body, and spatial uniformity of provided images were assessed using calibrated black body measurements and surface temperature monitoring.
Results: The Hikmicro module exhibited the most stable temperature readings, while FLIR One Pro showed the highest temperature increase over time. Seek Thermal CompactPRO demonstrated relatively better spatial uniformity. However, discrepancies in image resolution were noted, with FLIR One and Seek modules modifying image sizes through post-processing algorithms.
Conclusion: While SmartIRT modules offer affordability and portability, their performance varies significantly. Temporal stability emerges as a critical factor, with the Hikmicro module demonstrating leadership in this aspect. Careful consideration and validation are necessary when selecting and utilizing SmartIRT modules for medical applications.
导言:红外热成像技术(IRT)因其在诊断各种疾病方面的潜力而在医疗应用中获得了极大的关注。基于智能手机的红外热成像模块具有便携性和经济性,因此在医疗环境中的使用率越来越高。然而,这些模块在性能上的差异使人们对其在医疗应用中的可靠性产生了疑问:本研究比较了三种基于智能手机的 IRT 模块(SmartIRT-Hikmicro、FLIR One Pro 和 Seek Thermal CompactPRO),根据它们的数据表,这些模块的质量和参数相当。通过校准黑体测量和表面温度监测,对温度稳定性、人体表面温度和所提供图像的空间均匀性进行了评估:结果:Hikmicro 模块显示的温度读数最为稳定,而 FLIR One Pro 显示的温度随时间的推移升高幅度最大。Seek Thermal CompactPRO 的空间均匀性相对较好。然而,FLIR One 和 Seek 模块通过后处理算法修改了图像尺寸,导致图像分辨率存在差异:结论:虽然智能红外热像仪模块具有经济实惠和便携的特点,但其性能差异很大。时间稳定性是一个关键因素,Hikmicro 模块在这方面处于领先地位。在为医疗应用选择和使用智能红外模块时,有必要进行仔细考虑和验证。
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1963, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (MBEC) continues to serve the biomedical engineering community, covering the entire spectrum of biomedical and clinical engineering. The journal presents exciting and vital experimental and theoretical developments in biomedical science and technology, and reports on advances in computer-based methodologies in these multidisciplinary subjects. The journal also incorporates new and evolving technologies including cellular engineering and molecular imaging.
MBEC publishes original research articles as well as reviews and technical notes. Its Rapid Communications category focuses on material of immediate value to the readership, while the Controversies section provides a forum to exchange views on selected issues, stimulating a vigorous and informed debate in this exciting and high profile field.
MBEC is an official journal of the International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering (IFMBE).