Understanding Delayed Diabetes Diagnosis: An Agent-Based Model of Health-Seeking Behavior.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Medical Decision Making Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1177/0272989X251326908
Firouzeh Rosa Taghikhah, Araz Jabbari, Kevin C Desouza, Arunima Malik, Hadi A Khorshidi
{"title":"Understanding Delayed Diabetes Diagnosis: An Agent-Based Model of Health-Seeking Behavior.","authors":"Firouzeh Rosa Taghikhah, Araz Jabbari, Kevin C Desouza, Arunima Malik, Hadi A Khorshidi","doi":"10.1177/0272989X251326908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDiabetes is a rapidly growing global health issue, with the hidden burden of undiagnosed cases leading to severe complications and escalating health care costs.MethodsThis study investigated the potential of integrated behavioral frameworks to predict health-seeking behaviors and improve diabetes diagnosis timelines through the development of an agent-based model. Focusing on Narromine and Gilgandra in New South Wales, Australia, the model captured the integrative influence of 3 social theories-theory of planned behavior (TPB), health belief model (HBM), and goal framing theory (GFT)-on health care decisions across behavioral and nonbehavioral variables, providing a robust analysis of temporal diagnostic patterns, health care utilization, and costs.ResultsOur comparative experiments indicated that this multitheory framework improved predictive accuracy by 15% to 30% compared with single-theory models, effectively capturing the interplay of planned, belief-driven, and context-based health behaviors. Spatial-temporal analysis highlighted key regional and demographic variations in diagnosis behaviors. While early, planned medical visits were prevalent in regions with better access (Gilgandra), areas with limited infrastructure saw a reliance on hospital-based diagnoses (Narromine). Health care cost analysis demonstrated a nonlinear expenditure pattern, suggesting that these theories defy conventional linear cost trends. Scenario analysis demonstrated the impact of targeted interventions. Gender-specific awareness initiatives in Gilgandra reduced late-diagnosis rates among men by approximately 15%, while enhanced access to care in Narromine decreased hospital-based late diagnoses from a baseline of 80% to around 60%.ConclusionsThis study contributes an empirically grounded, policy-oriented decision support tool to inform targeted interventions, offering novel insights to improve diabetes management.HighlightsWe explored the delay in diabetes diagnosis, particularly within remote Australian communities, through looking into the health care-seeking behavior of individuals displaying diabetes symptoms.We developed an innovative agent-based model to craft a dynamic decision support tool for policy makers by providing unique insights into the health behaviors of diabetes patients.Our study contributes significantly to the understanding of public health management with particular concerns around diabetes, as well as equips the New South Wales Ministry of Health with impactful insights into the consequences of their decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49839,"journal":{"name":"Medical Decision Making","volume":" ","pages":"399-425"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11992636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X251326908","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundDiabetes is a rapidly growing global health issue, with the hidden burden of undiagnosed cases leading to severe complications and escalating health care costs.MethodsThis study investigated the potential of integrated behavioral frameworks to predict health-seeking behaviors and improve diabetes diagnosis timelines through the development of an agent-based model. Focusing on Narromine and Gilgandra in New South Wales, Australia, the model captured the integrative influence of 3 social theories-theory of planned behavior (TPB), health belief model (HBM), and goal framing theory (GFT)-on health care decisions across behavioral and nonbehavioral variables, providing a robust analysis of temporal diagnostic patterns, health care utilization, and costs.ResultsOur comparative experiments indicated that this multitheory framework improved predictive accuracy by 15% to 30% compared with single-theory models, effectively capturing the interplay of planned, belief-driven, and context-based health behaviors. Spatial-temporal analysis highlighted key regional and demographic variations in diagnosis behaviors. While early, planned medical visits were prevalent in regions with better access (Gilgandra), areas with limited infrastructure saw a reliance on hospital-based diagnoses (Narromine). Health care cost analysis demonstrated a nonlinear expenditure pattern, suggesting that these theories defy conventional linear cost trends. Scenario analysis demonstrated the impact of targeted interventions. Gender-specific awareness initiatives in Gilgandra reduced late-diagnosis rates among men by approximately 15%, while enhanced access to care in Narromine decreased hospital-based late diagnoses from a baseline of 80% to around 60%.ConclusionsThis study contributes an empirically grounded, policy-oriented decision support tool to inform targeted interventions, offering novel insights to improve diabetes management.HighlightsWe explored the delay in diabetes diagnosis, particularly within remote Australian communities, through looking into the health care-seeking behavior of individuals displaying diabetes symptoms.We developed an innovative agent-based model to craft a dynamic decision support tool for policy makers by providing unique insights into the health behaviors of diabetes patients.Our study contributes significantly to the understanding of public health management with particular concerns around diabetes, as well as equips the New South Wales Ministry of Health with impactful insights into the consequences of their decisions.

理解延迟糖尿病诊断:一个基于个体的求医行为模型。
糖尿病是一个快速增长的全球健康问题,未确诊病例的隐性负担导致严重的并发症和不断上升的卫生保健费用。方法本研究通过开发基于agent的模型,探讨综合行为框架在预测求医行为和改善糖尿病诊断时间表方面的潜力。该模型以澳大利亚新南威尔威尔州的narmine和Gilgandra为研究对象,涵盖了计划行为理论(TPB)、健康信念模型(HBM)和目标框架理论(GFT) 3种社会理论对医疗保健决策的综合影响,涵盖了行为和非行为变量,提供了对时间诊断模式、医疗保健利用和成本的稳健分析。结果我们的对比实验表明,与单一理论模型相比,这种多理论框架的预测准确性提高了15%至30%,有效地捕捉了计划、信念驱动和基于情境的健康行为的相互作用。时空分析突出了诊断行为的关键区域和人口差异。虽然在条件较好的地区(吉尔甘德拉),早期有计划的医疗访问很普遍,但基础设施有限的地区则依赖于医院诊断(窄矿)。医疗保健成本分析显示了一种非线性的支出模式,这表明这些理论违背了传统的线性成本趋势。情景分析证明了有针对性的干预措施的影响。吉尔甘德拉的性别意识举措将男性的晚期诊断率降低了约15%,而在纳洛明,提高获得护理的机会将基于医院的晚期诊断率从基线的80%降低到60%左右。结论本研究为有针对性的干预提供了一种基于经验的、政策导向的决策支持工具,为改善糖尿病管理提供了新的见解。我们通过调查显示糖尿病症状的个体的医疗保健寻求行为,探讨了糖尿病诊断的延迟,特别是在偏远的澳大利亚社区。我们开发了一个创新的基于主体的模型,通过提供对糖尿病患者健康行为的独特见解,为决策者制作一个动态的决策支持工具。我们的研究对理解公共卫生管理做出了重大贡献,特别是对糖尿病的关注,并为新南威尔士州卫生部提供了对其决策后果的有影响力的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Decision Making
Medical Decision Making 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Decision Making offers rigorous and systematic approaches to decision making that are designed to improve the health and clinical care of individuals and to assist with health care policy development. Using the fundamentals of decision analysis and theory, economic evaluation, and evidence based quality assessment, Medical Decision Making presents both theoretical and practical statistical and modeling techniques and methods from a variety of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信