A Retrospective Review of Concurrent versus Sequential Administration of Intrapleural Tissue Plasminogen Activator and Dornase alfa for Empyemas.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Katharine B Strickland, Jaclyn M Hawn, Shawn Leverett, Carolyn Magee Bell
{"title":"A Retrospective Review of Concurrent versus Sequential Administration of Intrapleural Tissue Plasminogen Activator and Dornase alfa for Empyemas.","authors":"Katharine B Strickland, Jaclyn M Hawn, Shawn Leverett, Carolyn Magee Bell","doi":"10.1016/j.pupt.2025.102359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intrapleural tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and dornase alfa (DNase) administered sequentially, separated by a one to two hour interval, is a mainstay of pleural infection treatment. Recent literature supports similar efficacy and safety of concurrent therapy (administered immediately after one another). Insufficient evidence are available to utilize concurrent therapy routinely.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of concurrent versus sequential intrapleural tPA and DNase in pleural infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, retrospective study of patients ≥ 18 years old admitted to the inpatient setting who received either concurrent or sequential intrapleural tPA or DNase between July 1, 2014, and January 1, 2023. The primary outcome was treatment failure, a composite of 30-day mortality and requirement for a video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Secondary outcomes included cumulative pleural fluid drainage, bleeding adverse events, and pain requiring analgesia dose escalation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 184 patients were included: 158 patients in the concurrent group and 26 patients in the sequential group. Treatment failure was similar between groups (18.4% vs 19.2%, P > 0.99). Increased pleural fluid drainage occurred in the concurrent versus sequential therapy group (1453 mL vs 836 mL, P = 0.05) with no differences in bleeding (23.4% vs 19.2%, P = 0.64) or analgesia dose escalation between groups (41.1% vs 23.1%, P = 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>and Relevance Concurrent intrapleural fibrinolytics have similar effectiveness and safety compared to sequential administration however, further investigation into the compatibility and stability of the medications is warranted to optimize future pleural infection management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20799,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"102359"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pupt.2025.102359","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intrapleural tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and dornase alfa (DNase) administered sequentially, separated by a one to two hour interval, is a mainstay of pleural infection treatment. Recent literature supports similar efficacy and safety of concurrent therapy (administered immediately after one another). Insufficient evidence are available to utilize concurrent therapy routinely.

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of concurrent versus sequential intrapleural tPA and DNase in pleural infections.

Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study of patients ≥ 18 years old admitted to the inpatient setting who received either concurrent or sequential intrapleural tPA or DNase between July 1, 2014, and January 1, 2023. The primary outcome was treatment failure, a composite of 30-day mortality and requirement for a video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Secondary outcomes included cumulative pleural fluid drainage, bleeding adverse events, and pain requiring analgesia dose escalation.

Results: A total of 184 patients were included: 158 patients in the concurrent group and 26 patients in the sequential group. Treatment failure was similar between groups (18.4% vs 19.2%, P > 0.99). Increased pleural fluid drainage occurred in the concurrent versus sequential therapy group (1453 mL vs 836 mL, P = 0.05) with no differences in bleeding (23.4% vs 19.2%, P = 0.64) or analgesia dose escalation between groups (41.1% vs 23.1%, P = 0.09).

Conclusion: and Relevance Concurrent intrapleural fibrinolytics have similar effectiveness and safety compared to sequential administration however, further investigation into the compatibility and stability of the medications is warranted to optimize future pleural infection management.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Pulmonary Pharmacology and Therapeutics (formerly Pulmonary Pharmacology) is concerned with lung pharmacology from molecular to clinical aspects. The subject matter encompasses the major diseases of the lung including asthma, cystic fibrosis, pulmonary circulation, ARDS, carcinoma, bronchitis, emphysema and drug delivery. Laboratory and clinical research on man and animals will be considered including studies related to chemotherapy of cancer, tuberculosis and infection. In addition to original research papers the journal will include review articles and book reviews. Research Areas Include: • All major diseases of the lung • Physiology • Pathology • Drug delivery • Metabolism • Pulmonary Toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信