Computational Optimization of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Dorsal Horn Interneuron Polarization.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Adantchede Louis Zannou, Mojtaba Belali Koochesfahani, Gabriel Gaugain, Denys Nikolayev, Marc Russo, Marom Bikson
{"title":"Computational Optimization of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Dorsal Horn Interneuron Polarization.","authors":"Adantchede Louis Zannou, Mojtaba Belali Koochesfahani, Gabriel Gaugain, Denys Nikolayev, Marc Russo, Marom Bikson","doi":"10.1016/j.neurom.2025.01.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The proposed mechanisms of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) follow the polarization of dorsal column axons; however, the development of subparesthesia SCS has encouraged the consideration of different targets. Given their relative proximity to the stimulation electrodes and their role in pain processing (eg, synaptic processing and gate control theory), spinal cord dorsal horn interneurons may be attractive stimulation targets.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We developed a computational modeling pipeline termed \"quasiuniform-mirror assumption\" and applied it to predict polarization of dorsal horn interneuron cell types (islet type, central type, stellate/radial, vertical-like) to SCS. The quasiuniform-mirror assumption allows the prediction of the peak and directional axes of dendrite polarization for each cell type and location in the dorsal horn, in addition to the impact of the stimulation pulse width and electrode configuration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For long pulses, the peak polarization per milliampere of SCS with a spaced bipolar configuration was islet type 3.5mV, central type 1.3mV, stellate/radial 1.4mV, and vertical-like 1.6mV. For stellate/radial, the peak dendrite polarization was dorsal-ventral, and for islet-type, the peak dendrite polarization was in the rostral-caudal axis. For islet type and central type cells, peak dendrite polarization was between stimulation electrodes, whereas for stellate/radial and vertical-like cells, peak dendrite polarization was under the stimulation electrodes. The impact of the pulse width depends on the membrane time constants. Assuming a 1-millisecond time constant, for a 1-millisecond or 100-μs pulse width, the peak dendrite polarization decreases (from direct current values) by approximately 33% and approximately 88%, respectively. Increasing the interelectrode distance beyond approximately 3 cm did not significantly increase the peak polarization but expanded the region of interneuron polarization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Predicted maximum polarization of islet-cells in the superficial dorsal horn at locations between electrodes is 4.6mV for 2 mA, 1-millisecond pulse SCS. A polarization of a few millivolts is sufficient to modulate synaptic processing through subthreshold mechanisms. Our simulations provide support for SCS approaches optimized to modulate the dendrites of dorsal horn neurons.</p>","PeriodicalId":19152,"journal":{"name":"Neuromodulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuromodulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2025.01.015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The proposed mechanisms of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) follow the polarization of dorsal column axons; however, the development of subparesthesia SCS has encouraged the consideration of different targets. Given their relative proximity to the stimulation electrodes and their role in pain processing (eg, synaptic processing and gate control theory), spinal cord dorsal horn interneurons may be attractive stimulation targets.

Materials and methods: We developed a computational modeling pipeline termed "quasiuniform-mirror assumption" and applied it to predict polarization of dorsal horn interneuron cell types (islet type, central type, stellate/radial, vertical-like) to SCS. The quasiuniform-mirror assumption allows the prediction of the peak and directional axes of dendrite polarization for each cell type and location in the dorsal horn, in addition to the impact of the stimulation pulse width and electrode configuration.

Results: For long pulses, the peak polarization per milliampere of SCS with a spaced bipolar configuration was islet type 3.5mV, central type 1.3mV, stellate/radial 1.4mV, and vertical-like 1.6mV. For stellate/radial, the peak dendrite polarization was dorsal-ventral, and for islet-type, the peak dendrite polarization was in the rostral-caudal axis. For islet type and central type cells, peak dendrite polarization was between stimulation electrodes, whereas for stellate/radial and vertical-like cells, peak dendrite polarization was under the stimulation electrodes. The impact of the pulse width depends on the membrane time constants. Assuming a 1-millisecond time constant, for a 1-millisecond or 100-μs pulse width, the peak dendrite polarization decreases (from direct current values) by approximately 33% and approximately 88%, respectively. Increasing the interelectrode distance beyond approximately 3 cm did not significantly increase the peak polarization but expanded the region of interneuron polarization.

Conclusions: Predicted maximum polarization of islet-cells in the superficial dorsal horn at locations between electrodes is 4.6mV for 2 mA, 1-millisecond pulse SCS. A polarization of a few millivolts is sufficient to modulate synaptic processing through subthreshold mechanisms. Our simulations provide support for SCS approaches optimized to modulate the dendrites of dorsal horn neurons.

脊髓刺激背角神经元极化的计算优化
目的:所提出的脊髓刺激(SCS)机制遵循背柱轴突的极化;然而,亚麻痹脊髓刺激(SCS)的发展促使人们考虑不同的目标。鉴于脊髓背角中间神经元相对靠近刺激电极,而且它们在疼痛处理过程中的作用(如突触处理和门控理论),脊髓背角中间神经元可能是有吸引力的刺激目标:我们开发了一种称为 "准均匀镜假设 "的计算建模管道,并将其用于预测背角中间神经元细胞类型(胰岛型、中央型、星状/放射状、垂直样)对 SCS 的极化。准均匀镜假设允许预测背角中每种细胞类型和位置的树突极化峰值和方向轴,以及刺激脉冲宽度和电极配置的影响:对于长脉冲,采用间隔双极配置的 SCS 每毫安培的极化峰值为胰岛型 3.5mV、中央型 1.3mV、星状/径状 1.4mV 和垂直样 1.6mV。对于星状/径状细胞,树突极化的峰值为背腹,而对于小岛型细胞,树突极化的峰值为喙-尾轴。对于胰岛型和中央型细胞,树突极化峰值位于刺激电极之间,而对于星状/径状和垂直样细胞,树突极化峰值位于刺激电极下方。脉冲宽度的影响取决于膜时间常数。假设时间常数为 1 毫秒,那么在 1 毫秒或 100 微秒的脉冲宽度下,树突极化峰值(与直流电值相比)分别降低了约 33% 和约 88%。将电极间距增加到约 3 厘米以上并不会显著增加极化峰值,但会扩大神经元间极化区域:结论:在 2 毫安、1 毫秒脉冲 SCS 条件下,背角浅层胰岛细胞在电极间位置的预测最大极化为 4.6 毫伏。几毫伏的极化足以通过阈下机制调节突触处理。我们的模拟为优化背角神经元树突调节的 SCS 方法提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuromodulation
Neuromodulation 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
978
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface is the preeminent journal in the area of neuromodulation, providing our readership with the state of the art clinical, translational, and basic science research in the field. For clinicians, engineers, scientists and members of the biotechnology industry alike, Neuromodulation provides timely and rigorously peer-reviewed articles on the technology, science, and clinical application of devices that interface with the nervous system to treat disease and improve function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信