The Association Between Diabetes and Mortality is Not Modified by Living Arrangements in Hemodialysis Patients in Japan.

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kidney360 Pub Date : 2025-04-03 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000784
Mutsumi Uesugi, Anna Tsutsui, Yoshitaka Murakami
{"title":"The Association Between Diabetes and Mortality is Not Modified by Living Arrangements in Hemodialysis Patients in Japan.","authors":"Mutsumi Uesugi, Anna Tsutsui, Yoshitaka Murakami","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Living arrangements, such as living alone or with a spouse, may affect mortality risk in hemodialysis patients with diabetes. This study investigated whether living arrangements modify the association between diabetes and mortality in community-dwelling hemodialysis patients in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from 27 outpatient dialysis units, this retrospective cohort study analysed 2799 community-dwelling hemodialysis patients (women: 33.7%) aged 40-89 years between April 2016 and March 2021. Each patient was placed into one of three categories according to living arrangements: living alone, with a spouse, or with others (excluding spouses). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause mortality. Interaction analyses were performed to assess the potential effect measure modification of the association between diabetes and mortality by living arrangements. The analyses were also conducted according to sex and age groups (40-64 and 65-89 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 835 deaths were observed during a mean follow-up period of 3.9 years. Diabetes showed a significantly higher mortality risk (HR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.42-1.89) in all patients. However, patients living alone did not have a significantly higher mortality risk than those living with a spouse (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.87-1.24). There was no significant interaction between diabetes and living arrangements (P=0.73). Women aged 65-89 years who were living with others had a significantly higher mortality risk than those living with a spouse (HR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.04-1.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Living arrangements did not modify the association between diabetes and mortality in community-dwelling hemodialysis patients. Frequent clinic visits and lifestyle support by medical staff related to hemodialysis treatment may have facilitated diabetes management and mitigated the negative influence of social isolation, thereby reducing mortality risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Living arrangements, such as living alone or with a spouse, may affect mortality risk in hemodialysis patients with diabetes. This study investigated whether living arrangements modify the association between diabetes and mortality in community-dwelling hemodialysis patients in Japan.

Methods: Using data from 27 outpatient dialysis units, this retrospective cohort study analysed 2799 community-dwelling hemodialysis patients (women: 33.7%) aged 40-89 years between April 2016 and March 2021. Each patient was placed into one of three categories according to living arrangements: living alone, with a spouse, or with others (excluding spouses). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause mortality. Interaction analyses were performed to assess the potential effect measure modification of the association between diabetes and mortality by living arrangements. The analyses were also conducted according to sex and age groups (40-64 and 65-89 years).

Results: A total of 835 deaths were observed during a mean follow-up period of 3.9 years. Diabetes showed a significantly higher mortality risk (HR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.42-1.89) in all patients. However, patients living alone did not have a significantly higher mortality risk than those living with a spouse (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.87-1.24). There was no significant interaction between diabetes and living arrangements (P=0.73). Women aged 65-89 years who were living with others had a significantly higher mortality risk than those living with a spouse (HR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.04-1.92).

Conclusions: Living arrangements did not modify the association between diabetes and mortality in community-dwelling hemodialysis patients. Frequent clinic visits and lifestyle support by medical staff related to hemodialysis treatment may have facilitated diabetes management and mitigated the negative influence of social isolation, thereby reducing mortality risk.

背景:独居或与配偶同住等生活安排可能会影响糖尿病血液透析患者的死亡风险。本研究调查了居住在日本社区的血液透析患者的生活安排是否会改变糖尿病与死亡率之间的关系:这项回顾性队列研究利用来自 27 个门诊透析单位的数据,分析了 2016 年 4 月至 2021 年 3 月期间年龄在 40-89 岁之间的 2799 名社区血液透析患者(女性:33.7%)。根据居住安排,每位患者被分为三类:单独居住、与配偶居住或与他人(不包括配偶)居住。采用 Cox 比例危险模型估算全因死亡率的调整后危险比 (HR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI)。进行了交互分析,以评估居住安排对糖尿病与死亡率之间关系的潜在影响。分析还根据性别和年龄组(40-64 岁和 65-89 岁)进行:结果:在平均 3.9 年的随访期内,共有 835 人死亡。在所有患者中,糖尿病患者的死亡风险明显更高(HR:1.63,95% CI:1.42-1.89)。然而,独居患者的死亡风险并没有明显高于与配偶同住的患者(HR:1.04,95% CI:0.87-1.24)。糖尿病与居住安排之间没有明显的交互作用(P=0.73)。与他人同住的 65-89 岁女性的死亡风险明显高于与配偶同住的女性(HR:1.41,95% CI:1.04-1.92):在社区居住的血液透析患者中,居住安排并不会改变糖尿病与死亡率之间的关系。与血液透析治疗相关的医务人员频繁的门诊探访和生活方式支持可能有助于糖尿病管理,减轻社会隔离的负面影响,从而降低死亡风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信