Accuracy of Post-Hospitalization Stroke Detection following Carotid Revascularization in Medicare Claims.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Jesse A Columbo, Sanuja Bose, Jialin Mao, Alana C Keegan, Christopher J Abularrage, David H Stone, Philip P Goodney, Caitlin W Hicks
{"title":"Accuracy of Post-Hospitalization Stroke Detection following Carotid Revascularization in Medicare Claims.","authors":"Jesse A Columbo, Sanuja Bose, Jialin Mao, Alana C Keegan, Christopher J Abularrage, David H Stone, Philip P Goodney, Caitlin W Hicks","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.03.201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke after carotid revascularization is a key effectiveness and quality metric relevant to patients, clinicians, and policymakers. To date, the accuracy of stroke rates reported from Medicare claims-based datasets for patients who underwent carotid revascularization remain unknown. The objective of this study was to validate the accuracy of using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes to detect stroke after carotid artery revascularization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent carotid revascularization at two institutions from January 2016 to December 2019. We used a list of ICD-10 codes to detect stroke that we previously derived and validated in two prospective cohorts with atherosclerosis. We applied the list to all patients who underwent carotid revascularization at the two institutions to identify patients with an ICD-10 code for stroke, either as the indication for the index procedure or postprocedure. We then performed a comprehensive medical record review for all stroke patients, as well as a 1:1 random sample of patients who underwent revascularization during the same time interval and did not have an ICD-10 code for stroke. Our primary outcome was the sensitivity and specificity of the ICD-10 codes to detect post-hospitalization stroke (i.e., after the index hospitalization) compared to a gold-standard of chart review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We performed a comprehensive medical record review of a cohort oversampled for stroke that included 199 patients (mean age 73.5±7.6 years, 62.3% male, 95.0% non-Hispanic white, and 61.8% symptomatic) who underwent carotid revascularization during the study interval. The majority of patients underwent carotid endarterectomy (82.4%), followed by transcarotid artery revascularization (12.1%) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (5.5%). Twelve patients had a stroke during their index hospitalization, creating a final cohort of 187 patients eligible for assessment of post-hospitalization stroke. After a median follow-up time of 453 days (IQR 82, 803), 10 asymptomatic patients and 10 symptomatic patients had a post-hospitalization stroke based on chart review. Among asymptomatic patients, the sensitivity and specificity of ICD-10 codes to detect a post-hospitalization stroke were 100% (95% CI: 69.2-100.0%) and 96.8% (95% CI: 88.8-99.6%), respectively when considering all linked diagnosis codes. Among symptomatic patients, the sensitivity and specificity of ICD-10 codes to detect a post-hospitalization stroke were 80.0% (95% CI: 44.4-97.5%) and 94.3% (95% CI: 88.0-97.9%), respectively, when considering all diagnosis codes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-hospitalization stroke can be accurately measured after carotid revascularization using ICD-10 codes in Medicare claims data. The reliability of the algorithm is higher among asymptomatic patients than symptomatic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.03.201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke after carotid revascularization is a key effectiveness and quality metric relevant to patients, clinicians, and policymakers. To date, the accuracy of stroke rates reported from Medicare claims-based datasets for patients who underwent carotid revascularization remain unknown. The objective of this study was to validate the accuracy of using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes to detect stroke after carotid artery revascularization.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent carotid revascularization at two institutions from January 2016 to December 2019. We used a list of ICD-10 codes to detect stroke that we previously derived and validated in two prospective cohorts with atherosclerosis. We applied the list to all patients who underwent carotid revascularization at the two institutions to identify patients with an ICD-10 code for stroke, either as the indication for the index procedure or postprocedure. We then performed a comprehensive medical record review for all stroke patients, as well as a 1:1 random sample of patients who underwent revascularization during the same time interval and did not have an ICD-10 code for stroke. Our primary outcome was the sensitivity and specificity of the ICD-10 codes to detect post-hospitalization stroke (i.e., after the index hospitalization) compared to a gold-standard of chart review.

Results: We performed a comprehensive medical record review of a cohort oversampled for stroke that included 199 patients (mean age 73.5±7.6 years, 62.3% male, 95.0% non-Hispanic white, and 61.8% symptomatic) who underwent carotid revascularization during the study interval. The majority of patients underwent carotid endarterectomy (82.4%), followed by transcarotid artery revascularization (12.1%) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (5.5%). Twelve patients had a stroke during their index hospitalization, creating a final cohort of 187 patients eligible for assessment of post-hospitalization stroke. After a median follow-up time of 453 days (IQR 82, 803), 10 asymptomatic patients and 10 symptomatic patients had a post-hospitalization stroke based on chart review. Among asymptomatic patients, the sensitivity and specificity of ICD-10 codes to detect a post-hospitalization stroke were 100% (95% CI: 69.2-100.0%) and 96.8% (95% CI: 88.8-99.6%), respectively when considering all linked diagnosis codes. Among symptomatic patients, the sensitivity and specificity of ICD-10 codes to detect a post-hospitalization stroke were 80.0% (95% CI: 44.4-97.5%) and 94.3% (95% CI: 88.0-97.9%), respectively, when considering all diagnosis codes.

Conclusions: Post-hospitalization stroke can be accurately measured after carotid revascularization using ICD-10 codes in Medicare claims data. The reliability of the algorithm is higher among asymptomatic patients than symptomatic patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信