Surface dose analysis and dosimetric comparison of Halcyon versus Truebeam in breast cancer radiotherapy: An OSL dosimetry study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mustafa Çağlar, Kudret Akçay, Esra Serin, Dursun Eşitmez, Mehmet Sıddık Cebe, Navid Kheradmand, Ömer Yazıcı, Dilek Ünal, Evrim Metcalfe
{"title":"Surface dose analysis and dosimetric comparison of Halcyon versus Truebeam in breast cancer radiotherapy: An OSL dosimetry study.","authors":"Mustafa Çağlar, Kudret Akçay, Esra Serin, Dursun Eşitmez, Mehmet Sıddık Cebe, Navid Kheradmand, Ömer Yazıcı, Dilek Ünal, Evrim Metcalfe","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Breast cancer is a neoplastic disease with high prevalence among women. Radiotherapy is one of the principal treatment modalities for this disease, but it poses significant challenges. This study aimed to compare and evaluate the technical and dosimetric performance of conventional C-arm linac systems and a new design, Halcyon, in the context of breast radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included ten patients who had undergone left breast radiotherapy. Additionally, breast radiotherapy was simulated with an anthropomorphic phantom, and similar planning studies were performed. A total of 40 treatment plans were prepared for ten patients using the field-in-field (FinF) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques on both TrueBeam and Halcyon systems. Subsequently, treatment plans were created for anthropomorphic phantoms using both techniques on both devices. The dosimetric comparisons were conducted on treatment plans with different treatment techniques on both devices. An anthropomorphic phantom was employed to ascertain the surface dose during treatment, with irradiation conducted in the following with the OSL dosimetry method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient plan comparisons showed no statistically significant differences in planning target volume (PTV) outcomes between techniques and devices. Upon analysis of the organ at risk (OAR), statistically significant differences were identified for FinF in both devices for low-dose regions. Analysis of the OSL results obtained from phantom irradiations revealed that the Halcyon results were higher than those obtained with the TrueBeam for both techniques. Additionally, a comparison of OSL results with the TPS data revealed discrepancies of up to 18% within the field and up to 22% outside the field. Furthermore, Halcyon demonstrated higher Monitor Unit (MU) values for both techniques, while still maintaining shorter treatment times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Halcyon demonstrated comparable technical and dosimetric outcomes to conventional C-arm linac in breast radiotherapy. Its distinctive design features contribute to the implementation of efficient and secure treatment modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Breast cancer is a neoplastic disease with high prevalence among women. Radiotherapy is one of the principal treatment modalities for this disease, but it poses significant challenges. This study aimed to compare and evaluate the technical and dosimetric performance of conventional C-arm linac systems and a new design, Halcyon, in the context of breast radiotherapy.

Methods: The study included ten patients who had undergone left breast radiotherapy. Additionally, breast radiotherapy was simulated with an anthropomorphic phantom, and similar planning studies were performed. A total of 40 treatment plans were prepared for ten patients using the field-in-field (FinF) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques on both TrueBeam and Halcyon systems. Subsequently, treatment plans were created for anthropomorphic phantoms using both techniques on both devices. The dosimetric comparisons were conducted on treatment plans with different treatment techniques on both devices. An anthropomorphic phantom was employed to ascertain the surface dose during treatment, with irradiation conducted in the following with the OSL dosimetry method.

Results: Patient plan comparisons showed no statistically significant differences in planning target volume (PTV) outcomes between techniques and devices. Upon analysis of the organ at risk (OAR), statistically significant differences were identified for FinF in both devices for low-dose regions. Analysis of the OSL results obtained from phantom irradiations revealed that the Halcyon results were higher than those obtained with the TrueBeam for both techniques. Additionally, a comparison of OSL results with the TPS data revealed discrepancies of up to 18% within the field and up to 22% outside the field. Furthermore, Halcyon demonstrated higher Monitor Unit (MU) values for both techniques, while still maintaining shorter treatment times.

Conclusion: The Halcyon demonstrated comparable technical and dosimetric outcomes to conventional C-arm linac in breast radiotherapy. Its distinctive design features contribute to the implementation of efficient and secure treatment modalities.

Halcyon和Truebeam在乳腺癌放疗中的表面剂量分析和剂量学比较:一项OSL剂量学研究。
目的:乳腺癌是一种女性高发的肿瘤性疾病。放疗是治疗这种疾病的主要方法之一,但它也带来了巨大的挑战。本研究旨在比较和评估传统 C 臂直列加速器系统和新型设计 Halcyon 在乳腺放射治疗方面的技术和剂量性能:研究对象包括十名接受过左侧乳房放射治疗的患者。此外,还使用拟人化模型模拟了乳腺放射治疗,并进行了类似的计划研究。在 TrueBeam 和 Halcyon 系统上使用场中场(FinF)和容积调制弧治疗(VMAT)技术为十名患者准备了共 40 个治疗计划。随后,在两种设备上使用这两种技术为拟人化模型创建了治疗计划。对两种设备上采用不同治疗技术的治疗计划进行了剂量比较。使用拟人模型确定治疗过程中的表面剂量,然后使用 OSL 剂量测定法进行照射:患者计划比较显示,不同技术和设备的计划靶体积(PTV)结果在统计学上没有显著差异。对危险器官(OAR)进行分析后发现,两种设备在低剂量区域的 FinF 方面存在统计学意义上的显著差异。对从模型照射中获得的 OSL 结果进行分析后发现,Halcyon 的结果高于 TrueBeam 两种技术的结果。此外,将 OSL 结果与 TPS 数据进行比较后发现,场内差异高达 18%,场外差异高达 22%。此外,Halcyon 对两种技术都显示出更高的监控单元 (MU) 值,同时仍保持较短的治疗时间:结论:在乳腺放射治疗中,Halcyon 的技术和剂量结果与传统的 C 臂直列加速器相当。其独特的设计特点有助于实施高效、安全的治疗模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信