Association between oxidative balance score and all-cause and cancer-specific mortality among cancer survivors.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Frontiers in Immunology Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1541675
Qingmei Gao, Xinfang Zhu, Mengke Chen, Rong Xia, Qi Zhang
{"title":"Association between oxidative balance score and all-cause and cancer-specific mortality among cancer survivors.","authors":"Qingmei Gao, Xinfang Zhu, Mengke Chen, Rong Xia, Qi Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fimmu.2025.1541675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Oxidative Balance Score (OBS) represents a novel metric for assessing systemic oxidative stress, where elevated scores reflect increased antioxidant exposure. This study aims to explore the association between OBS and all-cause and cancer-specific mortality among cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational cohort study was conducted involving 4099 cancer survivors, utilizing data obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) covering the years 1999 to 2018. The endpoints were established by cross-referencing data with the National Death Index (NDI). The OBS was developed based on dietary and lifestyle factors. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to examine the relationship between OBS and mortality risks. Restricted cubic spline was utilized to evaluate whether OBS exhibited a nonlinear association with the risk of death. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to assess cumulative survival differences across various OBS outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over an average follow-up of 84.00 months, 1481 (26.29%) participants died, including 484 (8.9%) who died from cancer. In the fully adjusted model, multivariable Cox regression revealed that each unit increase in OBS was linked to a 1.8% decrease in all-cause mortality risk (HR 0.982, 95%CI 0.972-0.991) and a 2.6% decrease in cancer-specific mortality risk (HR 0.974, 95%CI 0.958-0.991). In the context of all-cause mortality, the risk of death was found to be significantly lower in quartiles Q2, Q3 and Q4 when compared to the OBS in quartile Q1. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for Q2, Q3 and Q4 were as follows: Q2 (HR 0.833, 95%CI 0.707-0.981), Q3 (HR 0.789, 95%CI 0.650-0.958) and Q4 (HR 0.699, 95%CI 0.579-0.844). Regarding cancer-specific mortality, the HRs and 95%CIs for Q2, Q3 and Q4 in comparison to Q1 were as follows: Q2 (HR 0.663, 95%CI 0.505-0.869), Q3 (HR 0.688, 95%CI 0.488-0.969) and Q4 (HR 0.595, 95%CI 0.435-0.815). Similar associations were noted when the dietary and lifestyle components of the OBS were analyzed separately.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings indicate that higher levels of OBS are associated with a decrease in all-cause and cancer-specific mortality among cancer survivors. Our findings may contribute to the refinement of lifestyle intervention recommendations for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12622,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Immunology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1541675"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11965111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1541675","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Oxidative Balance Score (OBS) represents a novel metric for assessing systemic oxidative stress, where elevated scores reflect increased antioxidant exposure. This study aims to explore the association between OBS and all-cause and cancer-specific mortality among cancer survivors.

Methods: An observational cohort study was conducted involving 4099 cancer survivors, utilizing data obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) covering the years 1999 to 2018. The endpoints were established by cross-referencing data with the National Death Index (NDI). The OBS was developed based on dietary and lifestyle factors. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to examine the relationship between OBS and mortality risks. Restricted cubic spline was utilized to evaluate whether OBS exhibited a nonlinear association with the risk of death. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to assess cumulative survival differences across various OBS outcomes.

Results: Over an average follow-up of 84.00 months, 1481 (26.29%) participants died, including 484 (8.9%) who died from cancer. In the fully adjusted model, multivariable Cox regression revealed that each unit increase in OBS was linked to a 1.8% decrease in all-cause mortality risk (HR 0.982, 95%CI 0.972-0.991) and a 2.6% decrease in cancer-specific mortality risk (HR 0.974, 95%CI 0.958-0.991). In the context of all-cause mortality, the risk of death was found to be significantly lower in quartiles Q2, Q3 and Q4 when compared to the OBS in quartile Q1. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for Q2, Q3 and Q4 were as follows: Q2 (HR 0.833, 95%CI 0.707-0.981), Q3 (HR 0.789, 95%CI 0.650-0.958) and Q4 (HR 0.699, 95%CI 0.579-0.844). Regarding cancer-specific mortality, the HRs and 95%CIs for Q2, Q3 and Q4 in comparison to Q1 were as follows: Q2 (HR 0.663, 95%CI 0.505-0.869), Q3 (HR 0.688, 95%CI 0.488-0.969) and Q4 (HR 0.595, 95%CI 0.435-0.815). Similar associations were noted when the dietary and lifestyle components of the OBS were analyzed separately.

Conclusion: The findings indicate that higher levels of OBS are associated with a decrease in all-cause and cancer-specific mortality among cancer survivors. Our findings may contribute to the refinement of lifestyle intervention recommendations for this population.

癌症幸存者中氧化平衡评分与全因死亡率和癌症特异性死亡率之间的关系。
背景:氧化平衡评分(OBS)是一种评估全身氧化应激的新指标,分数升高反映抗氧化剂暴露增加。本研究旨在探讨OBS与癌症幸存者的全因死亡率和癌症特异性死亡率之间的关系。方法:利用1999年至2018年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的数据,对4099名癌症幸存者进行了一项观察性队列研究。终点通过与国家死亡指数(NDI)交叉参考数据确定。OBS是根据饮食和生活方式因素制定的。采用Cox比例风险回归模型检验OBS与死亡风险之间的关系。使用受限三次样条来评估OBS是否与死亡风险表现出非线性关联。此外,生成Kaplan-Meier生存曲线来评估各种OBS结局的累积生存差异。结果:在平均84.00个月的随访中,1481名(26.29%)参与者死亡,其中484名(8.9%)死于癌症。在完全调整后的模型中,多变量Cox回归显示,OBS每增加一个单位,全因死亡风险降低1.8% (HR 0.982, 95%CI 0.972-0.991),癌症特异性死亡风险降低2.6% (HR 0.974, 95%CI 0.958-0.991)。在全因死亡率的背景下,发现Q2、Q3和Q4四分位数的死亡风险明显低于Q1四分位数的OBS。Q2、Q3和Q4的风险比(HR)和95%可信区间(ci)分别为:Q2 (HR 0.833, 95% ci 0.707-0.981)、Q3 (HR 0.789, 95% ci 0.650-0.958)和Q4 (HR 0.699, 95% ci 0.579-0.844)。关于癌症特异性死亡率,Q2、Q3和Q4与Q1相比的HR和95%CI分别为:Q2 (HR 0.663, 95%CI 0.505-0.869)、Q3 (HR 0.688, 95%CI 0.488-0.969)和Q4 (HR 0.595, 95%CI 0.435-0.815)。当分别分析OBS的饮食和生活方式成分时,也发现了类似的关联。结论:研究结果表明,较高水平的OBS与癌症幸存者全因死亡率和癌症特异性死亡率的降低有关。我们的研究结果可能有助于改进这一人群的生活方式干预建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
11.00%
发文量
7153
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Immunology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across basic, translational and clinical immunology. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Immunology is the official Journal of the International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS). Encompassing the entire field of Immunology, this journal welcomes papers that investigate basic mechanisms of immune system development and function, with a particular emphasis given to the description of the clinical and immunological phenotype of human immune disorders, and on the definition of their molecular basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信