Rapid cycle QI methods ensure prompt paediatric emergency care during 2022 respiratory surge.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Alexandria Wiersma, Anthony Watkins, Traci Ertle, Bernadette Johnson, Sandra Spencer
{"title":"Rapid cycle QI methods ensure prompt paediatric emergency care during 2022 respiratory surge.","authors":"Alexandria Wiersma, Anthony Watkins, Traci Ertle, Bernadette Johnson, Sandra Spencer","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In fall 2022, paediatric EDs (PEDs) and urgent cares (PUCs) cared for an unprecedented number of children, leading to long waits and boarding patients. This surge mimicked the adult ED/UC COVID-19 pandemic experience. Learning from published data and surge response plans, we adapted our response using rapid cycle quality improvement methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary PUC/PED team met to determine the current state and create interventions. After the standard seasonal surge response did not have a significant impact, we further expanded inpatient capacity, created new physical PUC space, started provider intake and transitioned PED beds to inpatient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical control charts were used to monitor metrics from 4 weeks prior to the surge to when volumes returned to baseline, but improvement was seen prior to this. Our primary outcome measure, left without being seen (LWBS) rates, decreased from a peak of 40% to <5% and PUC door-to-provider time (process measure) decreased from 158 min to 106 min before the surge was over. These metrics also dropped below the prior baseline after volumes returned to normal. PED door-to-provider time (process measure) and PUC lengths of stay (LOS) (balancing measure) were maintained throughout.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using rapid cycle methodology, we responded quickly to an unprecedented patient volume by innovatively increasing staffing and space. We improved LWBS rates and PUC door-to-provider time despite high volumes and large numbers of boarding patients. We created efficiencies that allowed us to maintain PUC LOS and PED door-to-provider times during the surge. This resulted in sustained improvement, and we now operate with shorter LOS and door-to-provider times than historically achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214180","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In fall 2022, paediatric EDs (PEDs) and urgent cares (PUCs) cared for an unprecedented number of children, leading to long waits and boarding patients. This surge mimicked the adult ED/UC COVID-19 pandemic experience. Learning from published data and surge response plans, we adapted our response using rapid cycle quality improvement methodology.

Methods: A multidisciplinary PUC/PED team met to determine the current state and create interventions. After the standard seasonal surge response did not have a significant impact, we further expanded inpatient capacity, created new physical PUC space, started provider intake and transitioned PED beds to inpatient.

Results: Statistical control charts were used to monitor metrics from 4 weeks prior to the surge to when volumes returned to baseline, but improvement was seen prior to this. Our primary outcome measure, left without being seen (LWBS) rates, decreased from a peak of 40% to <5% and PUC door-to-provider time (process measure) decreased from 158 min to 106 min before the surge was over. These metrics also dropped below the prior baseline after volumes returned to normal. PED door-to-provider time (process measure) and PUC lengths of stay (LOS) (balancing measure) were maintained throughout.

Conclusions: Using rapid cycle methodology, we responded quickly to an unprecedented patient volume by innovatively increasing staffing and space. We improved LWBS rates and PUC door-to-provider time despite high volumes and large numbers of boarding patients. We created efficiencies that allowed us to maintain PUC LOS and PED door-to-provider times during the surge. This resulted in sustained improvement, and we now operate with shorter LOS and door-to-provider times than historically achieved.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信