Achieving epilepsy care for all: Ecosystem-based transformation.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1111/epi.18400
Susanna Gallani, Bernice Martin Lee, Lidia M V R Moura
{"title":"Achieving epilepsy care for all: Ecosystem-based transformation.","authors":"Susanna Gallani, Bernice Martin Lee, Lidia M V R Moura","doi":"10.1111/epi.18400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epilepsy exemplifies many of the systemic challenges of modern health care-fragmented care delivery, inequitable access, financial strain, and so on. The current \"system of systems\" (SoS) structure of U.S. health care fosters siloed operations among its member systems (e.g., insurers, health care institutions, providers, researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and technology vendors), failing to address interconnected issues like care continuity, clinician burnout, and appropriate resource allocation. This article proposes embracing a health care ecosystem approach as a solution, emphasizing interdependence, collaboration, and equity. Section 1 examines the shortcomings of the current care model, with a focus on its financial challenges and the systemic inefficiencies it perpetuates. Section 2 explains the concept of a health care ecosystem and its potential to drive equity through organic coordination and collective accountability. It highlights the role of key member systems-patients, advocacy groups, professional organizations, health care providers, payers, purchasers, policymakers, researchers, and industry leaders-in achieving equity in brain health care. Finally, Section 3 presents a roadmap for transitioning from SoS to ecosystem, outlining multiple actionable strategies, such as enhancing advocacy and data sharing by professional organizations, adopting integrated and multidisciplinary care models by health care providers, and prioritizing affordability and collaboration by industry leaders. Policymakers and federal research organizations can support the transition by incentivizing collaboration, expanding funding for health services research, and supporting data-driven decision-making. Advocacy groups can amplify collective voices and help prioritize improvement opportunities. Using epilepsy care as an example condition, this article argues that coordinated, multi-sector, and multi-level efforts can successfully and efficiently address systemic challenges, improve outcomes, and reduce inequities. It offers a replicable framework for achieving sustainable, scalable, and equitable care for chronic neurological conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18400","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epilepsy exemplifies many of the systemic challenges of modern health care-fragmented care delivery, inequitable access, financial strain, and so on. The current "system of systems" (SoS) structure of U.S. health care fosters siloed operations among its member systems (e.g., insurers, health care institutions, providers, researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and technology vendors), failing to address interconnected issues like care continuity, clinician burnout, and appropriate resource allocation. This article proposes embracing a health care ecosystem approach as a solution, emphasizing interdependence, collaboration, and equity. Section 1 examines the shortcomings of the current care model, with a focus on its financial challenges and the systemic inefficiencies it perpetuates. Section 2 explains the concept of a health care ecosystem and its potential to drive equity through organic coordination and collective accountability. It highlights the role of key member systems-patients, advocacy groups, professional organizations, health care providers, payers, purchasers, policymakers, researchers, and industry leaders-in achieving equity in brain health care. Finally, Section 3 presents a roadmap for transitioning from SoS to ecosystem, outlining multiple actionable strategies, such as enhancing advocacy and data sharing by professional organizations, adopting integrated and multidisciplinary care models by health care providers, and prioritizing affordability and collaboration by industry leaders. Policymakers and federal research organizations can support the transition by incentivizing collaboration, expanding funding for health services research, and supporting data-driven decision-making. Advocacy groups can amplify collective voices and help prioritize improvement opportunities. Using epilepsy care as an example condition, this article argues that coordinated, multi-sector, and multi-level efforts can successfully and efficiently address systemic challenges, improve outcomes, and reduce inequities. It offers a replicable framework for achieving sustainable, scalable, and equitable care for chronic neurological conditions.

实现全民癫痫护理:基于生态系统的转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信