Aspirin Plus Clopidogrel Reduces Infection Risk Compared With Aspirin or Clopidogrel Alone in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Zhangfeng Yu, Zheng Huang, Juan Wu, Baoshuai Shan, Linjun Xie, Tiantian Wang, Yanxia Yu, Hua Zhou, Xing Jin
{"title":"Aspirin Plus Clopidogrel Reduces Infection Risk Compared With Aspirin or Clopidogrel Alone in Acute Ischemic Stroke.","authors":"Zhangfeng Yu, Zheng Huang, Juan Wu, Baoshuai Shan, Linjun Xie, Tiantian Wang, Yanxia Yu, Hua Zhou, Xing Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Activated platelets modulate immune responses. Platelet activation coincides with poststroke immunosuppression, so we hypothesized that platelet inhibition would mitigate immunosuppression and decrease the risk of infectious complications after stroke. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the contribution of platelet inhibition by antiplatelet agents to poststroke infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective cohort study of 975 patients with acute ischemic stroke to compare the differences in the risk of infection within 7 days after admission between aspirin alone, clopidogrel alone and aspirin plus clopidogrel. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the association between antiplatelet therapy and poststroke infection.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 975 included patients, 578 received aspirin, 98 received clopidogrel, and 299 received both. A total of 113 patients experienced poststroke infection within 7 days after admission. The combination of aspirin and clopidogrel decreased the risk of poststroke infection compared with aspirin alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.77; P = 0.006), as compared with clopidogrel alone (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-1.00; P = 0.050). We found no difference in infection risk between clopidogrel and aspirin. When assessing site-specific infections, a significant difference was observed only in the risk of pneumonia between dual antiplatelet therapy and aspirin alone.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is associated with decreased infection after stroke compared with aspirin or clopidogrel monotherapy. The findings support the net protective effect of aspirin and clopidogrel against poststroke infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.03.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Activated platelets modulate immune responses. Platelet activation coincides with poststroke immunosuppression, so we hypothesized that platelet inhibition would mitigate immunosuppression and decrease the risk of infectious complications after stroke. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the contribution of platelet inhibition by antiplatelet agents to poststroke infection.

Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study of 975 patients with acute ischemic stroke to compare the differences in the risk of infection within 7 days after admission between aspirin alone, clopidogrel alone and aspirin plus clopidogrel. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the association between antiplatelet therapy and poststroke infection.

Findings: Among 975 included patients, 578 received aspirin, 98 received clopidogrel, and 299 received both. A total of 113 patients experienced poststroke infection within 7 days after admission. The combination of aspirin and clopidogrel decreased the risk of poststroke infection compared with aspirin alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.77; P = 0.006), as compared with clopidogrel alone (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-1.00; P = 0.050). We found no difference in infection risk between clopidogrel and aspirin. When assessing site-specific infections, a significant difference was observed only in the risk of pneumonia between dual antiplatelet therapy and aspirin alone.

Implications: Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is associated with decreased infection after stroke compared with aspirin or clopidogrel monotherapy. The findings support the net protective effect of aspirin and clopidogrel against poststroke infection.

与阿司匹林或氯吡格雷单独治疗急性缺血性卒中相比,阿司匹林加氯吡格雷可降低感染风险。
目的:活化血小板调节免疫反应。血小板激活与卒中后免疫抑制一致,因此我们假设血小板抑制可以减轻免疫抑制并降低卒中后感染并发症的风险。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估抗血小板药物对卒中后感染的血小板抑制作用。方法:我们对975例急性缺血性脑卒中患者进行前瞻性队列研究,比较阿司匹林单用、氯吡格雷单用和阿司匹林加氯吡格雷在入院后7天内感染风险的差异。采用多变量Cox比例风险回归模型评估抗血小板治疗与脑卒中后感染之间的关系。结果:在纳入的975例患者中,578例接受阿司匹林治疗,98例接受氯吡格雷治疗,299例两者均接受。113例患者在入院后7天内发生脑卒中后感染。与单独使用阿司匹林相比,阿司匹林与氯吡格雷联用可降低脑卒中后感染的风险(风险比[HR], 0.41;95%置信区间[CI], 0.22-0.77;P = 0.006),与单独使用氯吡格雷相比(HR, 0.46;95% ci, 0.22-1.00;P = 0.050)。我们发现氯吡格雷和阿司匹林在感染风险上没有差异。在评估部位特异性感染时,仅观察到双重抗血小板治疗和单独使用阿司匹林的肺炎风险有显著差异。意义:与阿司匹林或氯吡格雷单药治疗相比,阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双抗血小板治疗与卒中后感染减少相关。研究结果支持阿司匹林和氯吡格雷对中风后感染的净保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical therapeutics
Clinical therapeutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
154
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信