Recommendations for strengthening primary healthcare delivery models for chronic disease management in Mendoza: a RAND/UCLA modified Delphi panel.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Javier Roberti, Agustina Mazzoni, Marina Guglielmino, Andrea Falaschi, Yanina Mazzaresi, Ezequiel Garcia Elorrio
{"title":"Recommendations for strengthening primary healthcare delivery models for chronic disease management in Mendoza: a RAND/UCLA modified Delphi panel.","authors":"Javier Roberti, Agustina Mazzoni, Marina Guglielmino, Andrea Falaschi, Yanina Mazzaresi, Ezequiel Garcia Elorrio","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary healthcare (PHC) should be the cornerstone of equitable, efficient and high-quality healthcare in low- and middle-income countries. However, numerous challenges undermine its effectiveness in these settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify recommendations to improve PHC by integrating user preferences and provider capacity to deliver patient-centred and competent care in the Mendoza Province, Argentina.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Modified RAND Corporation/University of California, Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) Delphi method.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Health system of the Province of Mendoza, Argentina.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>32 public health experts from Mendoza.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Proposals were developed from secondary data, the People's Voice Survey, an electronic cohort of people with diabetes, qualitative studies of users' and professionals' experiences and reviews of interventions in primary care.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome: </strong>Experts had to evaluate proposals according to five criteria selected from the evidence to decision framework (impact, resource requirements, acceptability, feasibility and measurability).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 19 final recommendations emphasise policy continuity, evidence-based policy-making and standardisation of healthcare processes. Key areas include optimising healthcare processes, managing appointments for non-communicable diseases and ensuring competency-based training in PHC. Implementing performance-based incentives and improving financial sustainability were also highlighted. Other recommendations focus on the Digital Transformation Act, user participation in healthcare design and skills development for active engagement. Collaborative definitions of quality care, incident reporting systems and performance metrics are critical to improving healthcare quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This process provided decision-makers with contextualised information for health policy development. These interventions represent a step towards improving PHC, particularly chronic disease management, and provide a foundation for future regional research and health policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 4","pages":"e098074"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966989/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Primary healthcare (PHC) should be the cornerstone of equitable, efficient and high-quality healthcare in low- and middle-income countries. However, numerous challenges undermine its effectiveness in these settings.

Objective: To identify recommendations to improve PHC by integrating user preferences and provider capacity to deliver patient-centred and competent care in the Mendoza Province, Argentina.

Design: Modified RAND Corporation/University of California, Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) Delphi method.

Setting: Health system of the Province of Mendoza, Argentina.

Participants: 32 public health experts from Mendoza.

Interventions: Proposals were developed from secondary data, the People's Voice Survey, an electronic cohort of people with diabetes, qualitative studies of users' and professionals' experiences and reviews of interventions in primary care.

Primary outcome: Experts had to evaluate proposals according to five criteria selected from the evidence to decision framework (impact, resource requirements, acceptability, feasibility and measurability).

Results: The 19 final recommendations emphasise policy continuity, evidence-based policy-making and standardisation of healthcare processes. Key areas include optimising healthcare processes, managing appointments for non-communicable diseases and ensuring competency-based training in PHC. Implementing performance-based incentives and improving financial sustainability were also highlighted. Other recommendations focus on the Digital Transformation Act, user participation in healthcare design and skills development for active engagement. Collaborative definitions of quality care, incident reporting systems and performance metrics are critical to improving healthcare quality.

Conclusion: This process provided decision-makers with contextualised information for health policy development. These interventions represent a step towards improving PHC, particularly chronic disease management, and provide a foundation for future regional research and health policy.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信