Lived experiences and insights of Chinese patients with symptomatic osteoporosis on a patient-reported outcome (PRO) programme: a qualitative phenomenological study in Southwest China.
{"title":"Lived experiences and insights of Chinese patients with symptomatic osteoporosis on a patient-reported outcome (PRO) programme: a qualitative phenomenological study in Southwest China.","authors":"Yao Chen, Yuehua Zhang, Qianlian Zheng, Lei Sun","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the lived experiences of patients with symptomatic osteoporosis on a patient-reported outcomes (PROs) programme for symptom management and quality of life (QoL) improvement.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a qualitative phenomenological study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>PARTICIPANTS: 14 active participants in the PROs programme were recruited and interviewed through semi-structured face-to-face interviews. Colaizzi's seven-step method was employed for thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four overarching themes and two sub-themes emerged, including (1) varied perceptions of the PROs programme, where some participants found it beneficial for tracking symptoms while others cited challenges such as technological barriers and lack of actionable outcomes; (2) PROs as a tool for enhancing communication and facilitating appointments by enabling more efficient doctor-patient interactions and quicker scheduling; (3) emotional support provided by regular doctor-patient communication, with sub-themes of fostering a sense of belonging and offering psychological comfort; and (4) limitations of remote communication, highlighting challenges in addressing complex medical needs and providing immediate solutions for medication adjustments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PROs programmes facilitate symptom tracking, enhance communication and provide emotional support for patients with osteoporosis. However, limitations such as technological barriers and reliance on remote communication must be addressed. Ethical considerations, including potential over-reporting of symptoms to expedite care, require careful management. Future research should include patients who discontinue participating in the PROs programme prematurely and the perspectives of healthcare providers to provide a more balanced, comprehensive understanding.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 4","pages":"e087480"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087480","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the lived experiences of patients with symptomatic osteoporosis on a patient-reported outcomes (PROs) programme for symptom management and quality of life (QoL) improvement.
Design: This is a qualitative phenomenological study.
Setting: PARTICIPANTS: 14 active participants in the PROs programme were recruited and interviewed through semi-structured face-to-face interviews. Colaizzi's seven-step method was employed for thematic analysis.
Results: Four overarching themes and two sub-themes emerged, including (1) varied perceptions of the PROs programme, where some participants found it beneficial for tracking symptoms while others cited challenges such as technological barriers and lack of actionable outcomes; (2) PROs as a tool for enhancing communication and facilitating appointments by enabling more efficient doctor-patient interactions and quicker scheduling; (3) emotional support provided by regular doctor-patient communication, with sub-themes of fostering a sense of belonging and offering psychological comfort; and (4) limitations of remote communication, highlighting challenges in addressing complex medical needs and providing immediate solutions for medication adjustments.
Conclusions: PROs programmes facilitate symptom tracking, enhance communication and provide emotional support for patients with osteoporosis. However, limitations such as technological barriers and reliance on remote communication must be addressed. Ethical considerations, including potential over-reporting of symptoms to expedite care, require careful management. Future research should include patients who discontinue participating in the PROs programme prematurely and the perspectives of healthcare providers to provide a more balanced, comprehensive understanding.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.