Ali Ahmed Alzahrani, Peter Gelius, Anne Grunseit, Adrian Bauman, Klaus Gebel
{"title":"Physical activity policies in the six Gulf Cooperation Council countries: a qualitative study with document analysis.","authors":"Ali Ahmed Alzahrani, Peter Gelius, Anne Grunseit, Adrian Bauman, Klaus Gebel","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Gulf states have some of the lowest physical activity levels and some of the highest obesity rates globally. Understanding physical activity policies is important but under-researched in this region.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyse physical activity policies in terms of structures, formulation, implementation and evaluation in the six Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) member countries (Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates (UAE)).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched the websites of the Ministries of Health, Education, Sport, Transport, Tourism and Municipal Affairs of the GCC countries between March 2023 and February 2024 for documents related to physical activity policy. Experts from Saudi Arabia, Oman and Bahrain were consulted to identify unpublished documents. Desk research questions from the Health-Enhancing Physical Activity Policy Audit Tool were used to evaluate the content of these documents in terms of the policy cycle model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 39 policy documents from the six countries. Comparative analysis revealed centralised governance across GCC nations, except for the UAE's federal monarchy system. Policy formulation typically involves collaboration among health, sports and education ministries, although responsibilities vary. There were no sedentary behaviour reduction policies. Policy implementation lacks funding, especially for marginalised groups such as individuals with disabilities and immigrants. Evaluation lacks economic assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study revealed a lack of implementation of physical activity policies and a general dearth of policies aimed at reducing sedentary behaviour within the GCC. Enhancing transparency, inclusion and evaluation mechanisms are essential for fostering effective physical activity policies in GCC countries.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>Our study provides impetus for policy-makers in the Gulf region to develop policies addressing sedentary behaviour and improving the evaluation framework. Additionally, it serves as a foundation for researchers to identify and address gaps in future policy analysis, contributing to the advancement of effective strategies for promoting physical activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017627","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The Gulf states have some of the lowest physical activity levels and some of the highest obesity rates globally. Understanding physical activity policies is important but under-researched in this region.
Purpose: To analyse physical activity policies in terms of structures, formulation, implementation and evaluation in the six Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) member countries (Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates (UAE)).
Methods: We systematically searched the websites of the Ministries of Health, Education, Sport, Transport, Tourism and Municipal Affairs of the GCC countries between March 2023 and February 2024 for documents related to physical activity policy. Experts from Saudi Arabia, Oman and Bahrain were consulted to identify unpublished documents. Desk research questions from the Health-Enhancing Physical Activity Policy Audit Tool were used to evaluate the content of these documents in terms of the policy cycle model.
Results: We identified 39 policy documents from the six countries. Comparative analysis revealed centralised governance across GCC nations, except for the UAE's federal monarchy system. Policy formulation typically involves collaboration among health, sports and education ministries, although responsibilities vary. There were no sedentary behaviour reduction policies. Policy implementation lacks funding, especially for marginalised groups such as individuals with disabilities and immigrants. Evaluation lacks economic assessment.
Conclusions: Our study revealed a lack of implementation of physical activity policies and a general dearth of policies aimed at reducing sedentary behaviour within the GCC. Enhancing transparency, inclusion and evaluation mechanisms are essential for fostering effective physical activity policies in GCC countries.
Practical implications: Our study provides impetus for policy-makers in the Gulf region to develop policies addressing sedentary behaviour and improving the evaluation framework. Additionally, it serves as a foundation for researchers to identify and address gaps in future policy analysis, contributing to the advancement of effective strategies for promoting physical activity.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.