A pragmatic covariate-constrained cluster-randomised controlled trial of hybrid parents and health workers adaptive intervention for optimal (timely, cumulative age-appropriate) community-wide routine childhood immunisation coverage: the AGINTOPIC trial.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ugwu I Omale, Richard L Ewah, Chidinma I Amuzie, Cordis O Ikegwuonu, Glory E Nkwo, Chimaobi C Iwegbulam, Louisa C Ekwuazi
{"title":"A pragmatic covariate-constrained cluster-randomised controlled trial of hybrid parents and health workers adaptive intervention for optimal (timely, cumulative age-appropriate) community-wide routine childhood immunisation coverage: the AGINTOPIC trial.","authors":"Ugwu I Omale, Richard L Ewah, Chidinma I Amuzie, Cordis O Ikegwuonu, Glory E Nkwo, Chimaobi C Iwegbulam, Louisa C Ekwuazi","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vaccine-preventable infectious diseases (VPDs) covered by routine childhood immunisation programmes are major causes of morbidity/mortality as outbreaks continue to reoccur despite repeated efforts to increase immunisation coverage. This trial aimed at increasing optimal/timely immunisation coverage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Adaptive Group Intervention for Optimal routine childhood Immunisation Coverage (AGINTOPIC) trial was conducted from 1 June 2022 to 31 May 2023 in Ebonyi state, Nigeria. 16 geographical clusters (where the primary healthcare facilities were providing weekly routine childhood immunisation) were covariate-constrained-randomised (1:1) to control arm (receiving no intervention) and intervention arm (receiving hybrid parents/health workers adaptive engagement to enlighten/facilitate regular communications/working relationships between them regarding optimal immunisation). The primary outcomes included the proportion of children aged 5-9 months who had optimal/timely (cumulative age-appropriate) receipt of every recommended birth to 14 weeks vaccine and the age-appropriate vaccines receipt (receipt timeliness) score. The outcomes were measured via baseline and end-of-study repeated cross-sectional surveys. All analyses were done using a cluster-level method on intention-to-treat basis, and randomisation-based inference was done via adjusted clustered permutation tests (aCPTs) to check the robustness/validity of the main findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A mean proportion of 6.0% (SD 8.1) of children aged 5-9 months in the control arm had optimal/timely receipt of every recommended birth to 14 weeks vaccine, vs 14.3% (11.7) in the intervention arm (adjusted prevalence difference 10.8%, 95% CI 0.8% to 20.9%, p=0.0376, aCPT p=0.0093). The mean age-appropriate vaccines receipt score was 75.1 (17.8) in the control arm, vs 85.5 (9.5) in the intervention arm (adjusted mean difference 9.5, 95% CI 1.0 to 17.9, p=0.0317, aCPT p=0.0155).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AGINTOPIC intervention significantly increased the optimal/timely (cumulative age-appropriate) community-wide routine childhood immunisation coverage, and the evidence illuminates the need for the exploration and adaptation of such pragmatic/dynamic/scalable community engagement intervention by routine childhood immunisation programmes in the global efforts to address the recurrent outbreaks of VPDs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ISRCTN59811905.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017403","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccine-preventable infectious diseases (VPDs) covered by routine childhood immunisation programmes are major causes of morbidity/mortality as outbreaks continue to reoccur despite repeated efforts to increase immunisation coverage. This trial aimed at increasing optimal/timely immunisation coverage.

Methods: The Adaptive Group Intervention for Optimal routine childhood Immunisation Coverage (AGINTOPIC) trial was conducted from 1 June 2022 to 31 May 2023 in Ebonyi state, Nigeria. 16 geographical clusters (where the primary healthcare facilities were providing weekly routine childhood immunisation) were covariate-constrained-randomised (1:1) to control arm (receiving no intervention) and intervention arm (receiving hybrid parents/health workers adaptive engagement to enlighten/facilitate regular communications/working relationships between them regarding optimal immunisation). The primary outcomes included the proportion of children aged 5-9 months who had optimal/timely (cumulative age-appropriate) receipt of every recommended birth to 14 weeks vaccine and the age-appropriate vaccines receipt (receipt timeliness) score. The outcomes were measured via baseline and end-of-study repeated cross-sectional surveys. All analyses were done using a cluster-level method on intention-to-treat basis, and randomisation-based inference was done via adjusted clustered permutation tests (aCPTs) to check the robustness/validity of the main findings.

Results: A mean proportion of 6.0% (SD 8.1) of children aged 5-9 months in the control arm had optimal/timely receipt of every recommended birth to 14 weeks vaccine, vs 14.3% (11.7) in the intervention arm (adjusted prevalence difference 10.8%, 95% CI 0.8% to 20.9%, p=0.0376, aCPT p=0.0093). The mean age-appropriate vaccines receipt score was 75.1 (17.8) in the control arm, vs 85.5 (9.5) in the intervention arm (adjusted mean difference 9.5, 95% CI 1.0 to 17.9, p=0.0317, aCPT p=0.0155).

Conclusions: The AGINTOPIC intervention significantly increased the optimal/timely (cumulative age-appropriate) community-wide routine childhood immunisation coverage, and the evidence illuminates the need for the exploration and adaptation of such pragmatic/dynamic/scalable community engagement intervention by routine childhood immunisation programmes in the global efforts to address the recurrent outbreaks of VPDs.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN59811905.

一项实用的协变量约束的混合父母和卫生工作者的群体随机对照试验,以获得最佳的(及时的,累积年龄适宜的)社区范围常规儿童免疫接种覆盖率:AGINTOPIC试验。
导语:常规儿童免疫规划涵盖的疫苗可预防的传染病是发病率/死亡率的主要原因,尽管一再努力提高免疫接种覆盖率,但疫情仍在再次发生。该试验旨在提高最佳/及时的免疫覆盖率。方法:最佳常规儿童免疫接种覆盖率适应性群体干预(AGINTOPIC)试验于2022年6月1日至2023年5月31日在Ebonyi州进行。尼日利亚。16个地理集群(其中初级卫生保健设施每周提供常规儿童免疫接种)进行了协变量约束随机(1:1)对照组(不接受干预)和干预组(接受混合父母/卫生工作者适应性参与,以启发/促进他们之间关于最佳免疫接种的定期沟通/工作关系)。主要结局包括5-9月龄儿童获得最佳/及时(累积适龄)接种每一种推荐的出生至14周疫苗的比例,以及适龄疫苗接种(接种及时性)评分。结果通过基线和研究结束时重复的横断面调查来测量。所有分析均以意向治疗为基础,采用聚类水平方法进行,并通过调整聚类排列测试(aCPTs)进行基于随机化的推断,以检查主要发现的稳健性/有效性。结果:对照组5-9月龄儿童中6.0% (SD 8.1)的平均比例为最佳/及时接种了每次推荐的出生至14周疫苗,而干预组为14.3%(11.7)(调整后的患病率差异为10.8%,95% CI为0.8%至20.9%,p=0.0376, aCPT p=0.0093)。对照组的平均适龄疫苗接种评分为75.1(17.8),干预组为85.5(9.5)(校正平均差值为9.5,95% CI 1.0 ~ 17.9, p=0.0317, aCPT p=0.0155)。结论:AGINTOPIC干预措施显著提高了最佳/及时(累积适龄)社区范围常规儿童免疫接种覆盖率,证据表明,在全球努力解决vpd复发性爆发的过程中,需要通过常规儿童免疫规划探索和适应这种实用/动态/可扩展的社区参与干预措施。试验注册号:ISRCTN59811905。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信