Prospective Randomised Phase-II Trial of Ipilimumab/Nivolumab versus Standard of Care in non-clear cell Renal Cell Cancer - Results of the SUNNIFORECAST Trial.

IF 56.7 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
L Bergmann, L Albiges, M Ahrens, M Gross-Goupil, E Boleti, G Gravis, A Fléchon, M-O Grimm, J Bedke, P Barthélémy, D Castellano, B Mellado, P Ivanyi, S Rottey, A Flörcken, C Suarez, P Maroto, V Grünwald, S F Oosting, J Kopecky, S Zschäbitz, M Boegemann, T Buchler, G Niegisch, P J Goebell, T Waddell, F Joly, F Priou, M Retz, S Siemer, U Zimmermann, D Deckbar, I Burkholder, A Hartmann, J B Haanen
{"title":"Prospective Randomised Phase-II Trial of Ipilimumab/Nivolumab versus Standard of Care in non-clear cell Renal Cell Cancer - Results of the SUNNIFORECAST Trial.","authors":"L Bergmann, L Albiges, M Ahrens, M Gross-Goupil, E Boleti, G Gravis, A Fléchon, M-O Grimm, J Bedke, P Barthélémy, D Castellano, B Mellado, P Ivanyi, S Rottey, A Flörcken, C Suarez, P Maroto, V Grünwald, S F Oosting, J Kopecky, S Zschäbitz, M Boegemann, T Buchler, G Niegisch, P J Goebell, T Waddell, F Joly, F Priou, M Retz, S Siemer, U Zimmermann, D Deckbar, I Burkholder, A Hartmann, J B Haanen","doi":"10.1016/j.annonc.2025.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-clear cell renal cell cancers (nccRCCs) are a heterogeneous group of more than 20 different entities, but are rarely included in large, randomized trials. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors with or without immune checkpoint inhibition are considered as a standard of care (SOC), but optimal treatment is not yet defined. We designed the first prospective randomized trial comparing ipilimumab/nivolumab to SOC.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We randomized adult patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic nccRCC 1:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 doses followed by fixed dose nivolumab of 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks or to SOC. Patients were stratified by histology and by IMDC risk score. Central pathology review was mandatory. The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS) rate at 12 months, secondary endpoints included median OS, response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), safety and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 157 patients were assigned to receive ipilimumab/nivolumab, and 152 to SOC. The 12-month survival rate was 78% with ipilimumab/nivolumab (95% confidence interval [CI] 71-84%) compared to 68% with SOC (95% CI 60-75%, p=0.026). Median OS was 33.2 months vs. 25.2 months , p=0.163 [HR 0.81 (0.61-1.099]. PFS was similar in both arms [HR 0.99 (0.77-1.28)]. The ORR was 32.8% vs 19.3%. No major differences between papillary and non-papillary RCC subtypes were observed for any endpoint. Exploratory analysis showed a significant OS advantage (HR 0.56 [95% CI 0.37-0.86]) associated with a PD-L1 CPS score >1 . Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity occurred in 27 patients (17%) with ipilimumab/nivolumab and 13 patients (9%) with SOC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ipilimumab/nivolumab demonstrated a significantly longer OS at the 12-month milestone and an acceptable toxicity profile. Our results therefore underline a relevant clinical benefit of ipilimumab/nivolumab in previously untreated nccRCC entities compared to current SOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":8000,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":56.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2025.03.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Non-clear cell renal cell cancers (nccRCCs) are a heterogeneous group of more than 20 different entities, but are rarely included in large, randomized trials. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors with or without immune checkpoint inhibition are considered as a standard of care (SOC), but optimal treatment is not yet defined. We designed the first prospective randomized trial comparing ipilimumab/nivolumab to SOC.

Patients and methods: We randomized adult patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic nccRCC 1:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 doses followed by fixed dose nivolumab of 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks or to SOC. Patients were stratified by histology and by IMDC risk score. Central pathology review was mandatory. The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS) rate at 12 months, secondary endpoints included median OS, response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), safety and quality of life.

Results: In total, 157 patients were assigned to receive ipilimumab/nivolumab, and 152 to SOC. The 12-month survival rate was 78% with ipilimumab/nivolumab (95% confidence interval [CI] 71-84%) compared to 68% with SOC (95% CI 60-75%, p=0.026). Median OS was 33.2 months vs. 25.2 months , p=0.163 [HR 0.81 (0.61-1.099]. PFS was similar in both arms [HR 0.99 (0.77-1.28)]. The ORR was 32.8% vs 19.3%. No major differences between papillary and non-papillary RCC subtypes were observed for any endpoint. Exploratory analysis showed a significant OS advantage (HR 0.56 [95% CI 0.37-0.86]) associated with a PD-L1 CPS score >1 . Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity occurred in 27 patients (17%) with ipilimumab/nivolumab and 13 patients (9%) with SOC.

Conclusions: Ipilimumab/nivolumab demonstrated a significantly longer OS at the 12-month milestone and an acceptable toxicity profile. Our results therefore underline a relevant clinical benefit of ipilimumab/nivolumab in previously untreated nccRCC entities compared to current SOC.

背景:非透明细胞肾细胞癌(nccRCCs)是一个由 20 多种不同实体组成的异质性群体,但很少被纳入大型随机试验。含有或不含免疫检查点抑制剂的酪氨酸激酶抑制剂被认为是一种标准治疗方法(SOC),但最佳治疗方法尚未确定。我们设计了首个前瞻性随机试验,将伊匹单抗/nivolumab与SOC进行比较:我们将既往未经治疗的晚期或转移性 nccRCC 成年患者按 1:1 随机分配到 nivolumab 3 mg/kg 加 ipilimumab 1 mg/kg,每 3 周 1 次,共 4 次,然后是固定剂量 nivolumab(每 2 周 240 毫克或每 4 周 480 毫克)或 SOC。根据组织学和IMDC风险评分对患者进行分层。中央病理学审查是强制性的。主要终点是12个月的总生存率(OS),次要终点包括中位OS、反应率、无进展生存率(PFS)、安全性和生活质量:共有157名患者被分配接受伊匹单抗/nivolumab治疗,152名患者被分配接受SOC治疗。伊匹单抗/nivolumab的12个月生存率为78%(95%置信区间[CI] 71-84%),而SOC的12个月生存率为68%(95%置信区间[CI] 60-75%,P=0.026)。中位OS为33.2个月 vs. 25.2个月,p=0.163 [HR 0.81 (0.61-1.099]]。两组的 PFS 相似[HR 0.99 (0.77-1.28)]。ORR为32.8% vs 19.3%。乳头状和非乳头状RCC亚型之间在任何终点上都没有明显差异。探索性分析显示,PD-L1 CPS评分大于1的患者具有显著的OS优势(HR 0.56 [95% CI 0.37-0.86])。27例患者(17%)使用伊匹单抗/nivolumab,13例患者(9%)使用SOC,因毒性而中断治疗:结论:在12个月的里程碑上,伊匹单抗/nivolumab的OS明显更长,毒性也可接受。因此,我们的研究结果强调,与目前的SOC相比,ipilimumab/nivolumab对既往未接受过治疗的nccRCC患者具有相关的临床益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Oncology
Annals of Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
63.90
自引率
1.00%
发文量
3712
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Oncology, the official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, offers rapid and efficient peer-reviewed publications on innovative cancer treatments and translational research in oncology and precision medicine. The journal primarily focuses on areas such as systemic anticancer therapy, with a specific emphasis on molecular targeted agents and new immune therapies. We also welcome randomized trials, including negative results, as well as top-level guidelines. Additionally, we encourage submissions in emerging fields that are crucial to personalized medicine, such as molecular pathology, bioinformatics, modern statistics, and biotechnologies. Manuscripts related to radiotherapy, surgery, and pediatrics will be considered if they demonstrate a clear interaction with any of the aforementioned fields or if they present groundbreaking findings. Our international editorial board comprises renowned experts who are leaders in their respective fields. Through Annals of Oncology, we strive to provide the most effective communication on the dynamic and ever-evolving global oncology landscape.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信