Prospective Randomised Phase-II Trial of Ipilimumab/Nivolumab versus Standard of Care in non-clear cell Renal Cell Cancer - Results of the SUNNIFORECAST Trial.
L Bergmann, L Albiges, M Ahrens, M Gross-Goupil, E Boleti, G Gravis, A Fléchon, M-O Grimm, J Bedke, P Barthélémy, D Castellano, B Mellado, P Ivanyi, S Rottey, A Flörcken, C Suarez, P Maroto, V Grünwald, S F Oosting, J Kopecky, S Zschäbitz, M Boegemann, T Buchler, G Niegisch, P J Goebell, T Waddell, F Joly, F Priou, M Retz, S Siemer, U Zimmermann, D Deckbar, I Burkholder, A Hartmann, J B Haanen
{"title":"Prospective Randomised Phase-II Trial of Ipilimumab/Nivolumab versus Standard of Care in non-clear cell Renal Cell Cancer - Results of the SUNNIFORECAST Trial.","authors":"L Bergmann, L Albiges, M Ahrens, M Gross-Goupil, E Boleti, G Gravis, A Fléchon, M-O Grimm, J Bedke, P Barthélémy, D Castellano, B Mellado, P Ivanyi, S Rottey, A Flörcken, C Suarez, P Maroto, V Grünwald, S F Oosting, J Kopecky, S Zschäbitz, M Boegemann, T Buchler, G Niegisch, P J Goebell, T Waddell, F Joly, F Priou, M Retz, S Siemer, U Zimmermann, D Deckbar, I Burkholder, A Hartmann, J B Haanen","doi":"10.1016/j.annonc.2025.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-clear cell renal cell cancers (nccRCCs) are a heterogeneous group of more than 20 different entities, but are rarely included in large, randomized trials. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors with or without immune checkpoint inhibition are considered as a standard of care (SOC), but optimal treatment is not yet defined. We designed the first prospective randomized trial comparing ipilimumab/nivolumab to SOC.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We randomized adult patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic nccRCC 1:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 doses followed by fixed dose nivolumab of 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks or to SOC. Patients were stratified by histology and by IMDC risk score. Central pathology review was mandatory. The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS) rate at 12 months, secondary endpoints included median OS, response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), safety and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 157 patients were assigned to receive ipilimumab/nivolumab, and 152 to SOC. The 12-month survival rate was 78% with ipilimumab/nivolumab (95% confidence interval [CI] 71-84%) compared to 68% with SOC (95% CI 60-75%, p=0.026). Median OS was 33.2 months vs. 25.2 months , p=0.163 [HR 0.81 (0.61-1.099]. PFS was similar in both arms [HR 0.99 (0.77-1.28)]. The ORR was 32.8% vs 19.3%. No major differences between papillary and non-papillary RCC subtypes were observed for any endpoint. Exploratory analysis showed a significant OS advantage (HR 0.56 [95% CI 0.37-0.86]) associated with a PD-L1 CPS score >1 . Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity occurred in 27 patients (17%) with ipilimumab/nivolumab and 13 patients (9%) with SOC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ipilimumab/nivolumab demonstrated a significantly longer OS at the 12-month milestone and an acceptable toxicity profile. Our results therefore underline a relevant clinical benefit of ipilimumab/nivolumab in previously untreated nccRCC entities compared to current SOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":8000,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":56.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2025.03.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Non-clear cell renal cell cancers (nccRCCs) are a heterogeneous group of more than 20 different entities, but are rarely included in large, randomized trials. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors with or without immune checkpoint inhibition are considered as a standard of care (SOC), but optimal treatment is not yet defined. We designed the first prospective randomized trial comparing ipilimumab/nivolumab to SOC.
Patients and methods: We randomized adult patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic nccRCC 1:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 doses followed by fixed dose nivolumab of 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks or to SOC. Patients were stratified by histology and by IMDC risk score. Central pathology review was mandatory. The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS) rate at 12 months, secondary endpoints included median OS, response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), safety and quality of life.
Results: In total, 157 patients were assigned to receive ipilimumab/nivolumab, and 152 to SOC. The 12-month survival rate was 78% with ipilimumab/nivolumab (95% confidence interval [CI] 71-84%) compared to 68% with SOC (95% CI 60-75%, p=0.026). Median OS was 33.2 months vs. 25.2 months , p=0.163 [HR 0.81 (0.61-1.099]. PFS was similar in both arms [HR 0.99 (0.77-1.28)]. The ORR was 32.8% vs 19.3%. No major differences between papillary and non-papillary RCC subtypes were observed for any endpoint. Exploratory analysis showed a significant OS advantage (HR 0.56 [95% CI 0.37-0.86]) associated with a PD-L1 CPS score >1 . Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity occurred in 27 patients (17%) with ipilimumab/nivolumab and 13 patients (9%) with SOC.
Conclusions: Ipilimumab/nivolumab demonstrated a significantly longer OS at the 12-month milestone and an acceptable toxicity profile. Our results therefore underline a relevant clinical benefit of ipilimumab/nivolumab in previously untreated nccRCC entities compared to current SOC.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Oncology, the official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, offers rapid and efficient peer-reviewed publications on innovative cancer treatments and translational research in oncology and precision medicine.
The journal primarily focuses on areas such as systemic anticancer therapy, with a specific emphasis on molecular targeted agents and new immune therapies. We also welcome randomized trials, including negative results, as well as top-level guidelines. Additionally, we encourage submissions in emerging fields that are crucial to personalized medicine, such as molecular pathology, bioinformatics, modern statistics, and biotechnologies. Manuscripts related to radiotherapy, surgery, and pediatrics will be considered if they demonstrate a clear interaction with any of the aforementioned fields or if they present groundbreaking findings.
Our international editorial board comprises renowned experts who are leaders in their respective fields. Through Annals of Oncology, we strive to provide the most effective communication on the dynamic and ever-evolving global oncology landscape.