Comparison of Dose Escalation Versus Switching to Tirzepatide Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Lower Doses of Dulaglutide : A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 19.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Liana K Billings, Linsey Winne, Palash Sharma, Elisa Gomez-Valderas, K Karthik Chivukula, Anita Y M Kwan
{"title":"Comparison of Dose Escalation Versus Switching to Tirzepatide Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Lower Doses of Dulaglutide : A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Liana K Billings, Linsey Winne, Palash Sharma, Elisa Gomez-Valderas, K Karthik Chivukula, Anita Y M Kwan","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-03849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tirzepatide, a once-weekly glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist approved for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes or obesity, showed clinically meaningful reductions in hemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub> (HbA<sub>1c</sub>) and body weight in the SURPASS phase 3 clinical trial program.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare efficacy and safety of escalation of dulaglutide dose versus switching to tirzepatide in inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 4 trial (SURPASS-SWITCH [A Phase 4, Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Weekly Dulaglutide to Weekly Tirzepatide in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes], ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05564039).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>38 sites across 5 countries.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults with HbA<sub>1c</sub> 7.0% or greater to 9.5% or less, stable body weight, body mass index of 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> or greater, receiving a stable dose of dulaglutide (0.75 or 1.5 mg) for at least 6 months and 0 to 3 oral antihyperglycemic medications for at least 3 months.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Escalation of dulaglutide to 4.5 mg or maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or switching to tirzepatide.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary end point was change from baseline in HbA<sub>1c</sub> at week 40. The key secondary end point was change from baseline in weight at week 40.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 282 adults were randomly assigned to tirzepatide (<i>n</i> = 139) or dulaglutide (<i>n</i> = 143). Change from baseline in HbA<sub>1c</sub> at week 40 was -1.44% (SE, 0.07) with tirzepatide, 15 mg or MTD, and -0.67% (SE, 0.08) with dulaglutide, 4.5 mg or MTD (estimated treatment difference, -0.77% [95% CI, -0.98% to -0.56%; <i>P</i> < 0.001]). Change from baseline in weight at week 40 was -10.5 kg (SE, 0.5) with tirzepatide and -3.6 kg (SE, 0.5) with dulaglutide (estimated treatment difference, -6.9 kg [CI, -8.3 to -5.5 kg; <i>P</i> < 0.001]). Serious adverse events were reported by 10 (7.2%) tirzepatide and 10 (7.0%) dulaglutide participants. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea and diarrhea.</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>Open-label design.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In SURPASS-SWITCH, switching treatment to tirzepatide provided additional HbA<sub>1c</sub> reduction and weight loss compared with escalating treatment with dulaglutide.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>Eli Lilly and Company.</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-03849","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tirzepatide, a once-weekly glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist approved for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes or obesity, showed clinically meaningful reductions in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and body weight in the SURPASS phase 3 clinical trial program.

Objective: To compare efficacy and safety of escalation of dulaglutide dose versus switching to tirzepatide in inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.

Design: Multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 4 trial (SURPASS-SWITCH [A Phase 4, Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Weekly Dulaglutide to Weekly Tirzepatide in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes], ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05564039).

Setting: 38 sites across 5 countries.

Participants: Adults with HbA1c 7.0% or greater to 9.5% or less, stable body weight, body mass index of 25 kg/m2 or greater, receiving a stable dose of dulaglutide (0.75 or 1.5 mg) for at least 6 months and 0 to 3 oral antihyperglycemic medications for at least 3 months.

Intervention: Escalation of dulaglutide to 4.5 mg or maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or switching to tirzepatide.

Measurements: The primary end point was change from baseline in HbA1c at week 40. The key secondary end point was change from baseline in weight at week 40.

Results: A total of 282 adults were randomly assigned to tirzepatide (n = 139) or dulaglutide (n = 143). Change from baseline in HbA1c at week 40 was -1.44% (SE, 0.07) with tirzepatide, 15 mg or MTD, and -0.67% (SE, 0.08) with dulaglutide, 4.5 mg or MTD (estimated treatment difference, -0.77% [95% CI, -0.98% to -0.56%; P < 0.001]). Change from baseline in weight at week 40 was -10.5 kg (SE, 0.5) with tirzepatide and -3.6 kg (SE, 0.5) with dulaglutide (estimated treatment difference, -6.9 kg [CI, -8.3 to -5.5 kg; P < 0.001]). Serious adverse events were reported by 10 (7.2%) tirzepatide and 10 (7.0%) dulaglutide participants. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea and diarrhea.

Limitation: Open-label design.

Conclusion: In SURPASS-SWITCH, switching treatment to tirzepatide provided additional HbA1c reduction and weight loss compared with escalating treatment with dulaglutide.

Primary funding source: Eli Lilly and Company.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1136
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信