Impact of early versus conventional kidney replacement therapy initiation in tumor lysis syndrome: a target trial emulation.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Justine Serre, Guillaume Mulier, Charlotte Boud'hors, Marie Lemerle, Moustafa Abdel-Nabey, Corentin Orvain, Anis Chaba, Lucie Biard, Julien Demiselle, Lara Zafrani
{"title":"Impact of early versus conventional kidney replacement therapy initiation in tumor lysis syndrome: a target trial emulation.","authors":"Justine Serre, Guillaume Mulier, Charlotte Boud'hors, Marie Lemerle, Moustafa Abdel-Nabey, Corentin Orvain, Anis Chaba, Lucie Biard, Julien Demiselle, Lara Zafrani","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01439-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), the optimal timing and criteria for initiating kidney replacement therapy (KRT) remain unclear. This study aims to assess the effect of initiating KRT at various phosphatemia thresholds on Major Adverse Kidney Events at day 30 (MAKE30).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We retrospectively emulated a pragmatic clinical trial comparing the effect of KRT initiation at various phosphatemia thresholds versus a conventional approach during TLS on MAKE30. All consecutive patients admitted to the ICU at Saint-Louis University hospital in Paris and Angers University hospital between January 2007 and June 2020, presenting with laboratory TLS were included. The design criteria of a clinical trial were mimicked by using the cloning, censoring and weighting method. The primary outcome was the MAKE30 composite outcome, considering only KRT requirement between day 7 and day 30 for the dialysis criteria. We evaluated multiple phosphatemia thresholds to guide KRT initiation, ranging from 6.20 mg.dL<sup>-1</sup> to 9.30 mg.dL<sup>-1</sup>. Among the initial population of 220 patients, 192 were included in the emulated trial (median age 60 years old, with non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Acute Leukemia being the most frequent hematological malignancies). TLS-related AKI occurred in 140 patients, and 75 patients met the criteria for MAKE30. Regardless of the phosphate threshold considered, KRT initiation based on phosphate level was not associated with a significant difference in the MAKE30 rate. KRT requirement during the first 7 days (Odd Ratio [OR] 4.01 [1.65-4.86], p = 0.003) and non-renal SOFA (OR 1.39 per 1 point increment [1.25-1.57], p < 0.001) were identified as factors associated with MAKE30 (multivariable analysis).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results do not support the strategy of KRT initiation based on a sole critical phosphatemia level in TLS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11968619/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01439-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the context of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), the optimal timing and criteria for initiating kidney replacement therapy (KRT) remain unclear. This study aims to assess the effect of initiating KRT at various phosphatemia thresholds on Major Adverse Kidney Events at day 30 (MAKE30).

Methods and results: We retrospectively emulated a pragmatic clinical trial comparing the effect of KRT initiation at various phosphatemia thresholds versus a conventional approach during TLS on MAKE30. All consecutive patients admitted to the ICU at Saint-Louis University hospital in Paris and Angers University hospital between January 2007 and June 2020, presenting with laboratory TLS were included. The design criteria of a clinical trial were mimicked by using the cloning, censoring and weighting method. The primary outcome was the MAKE30 composite outcome, considering only KRT requirement between day 7 and day 30 for the dialysis criteria. We evaluated multiple phosphatemia thresholds to guide KRT initiation, ranging from 6.20 mg.dL-1 to 9.30 mg.dL-1. Among the initial population of 220 patients, 192 were included in the emulated trial (median age 60 years old, with non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Acute Leukemia being the most frequent hematological malignancies). TLS-related AKI occurred in 140 patients, and 75 patients met the criteria for MAKE30. Regardless of the phosphate threshold considered, KRT initiation based on phosphate level was not associated with a significant difference in the MAKE30 rate. KRT requirement during the first 7 days (Odd Ratio [OR] 4.01 [1.65-4.86], p = 0.003) and non-renal SOFA (OR 1.39 per 1 point increment [1.25-1.57], p < 0.001) were identified as factors associated with MAKE30 (multivariable analysis).

Conclusion: Our results do not support the strategy of KRT initiation based on a sole critical phosphatemia level in TLS patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信