Research priorities for pediatric pain management in emergency medicine.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Daniel S Tsze, Rebecca K Burger, Eileen J Klein, Todd P Chang, Neil G Uspal, Alessandra Guiner-da Silva, Lorin R Browne, Keli D Coleman, Corrie E Chumpitazi, Amy L Drendel
{"title":"Research priorities for pediatric pain management in emergency medicine.","authors":"Daniel S Tsze, Rebecca K Burger, Eileen J Klein, Todd P Chang, Neil G Uspal, Alessandra Guiner-da Silva, Lorin R Browne, Keli D Coleman, Corrie E Chumpitazi, Amy L Drendel","doi":"10.1111/acem.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a high prevalence of acute pain in children cared for in the emergency care setting. However, there are still significant gaps in knowledge regarding optimal pain management. We aimed to develop a prioritized research agenda that identifies key questions for pediatric pain management in the emergency care setting that will guide future research and optimize care for children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a modified Delphi approach to achieve consensus among a multidisciplinary and geographically diverse expert advisory group. An initial list of 108 research questions was identified, with successive rounds of questionnaires conducted until there was a convergence of opinion or a point of diminishing returns was reached. The list was iteratively refined each round by advisory group members who ranked research questions and provided suggestions for potential additional questions and feedback regarding questions considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine advisory group members participated in the modified Delphi approach. Over the course of two rounds, we identified 10 research questions as the highest priority for future investigation. These questions included topics addressing short- and long-term outcomes related to inadequately assessed and treated pain, patient- and family-centered outcomes, optimizing analgesia in the emergency department (ED) and at home after discharge from the ED, nonpharmacologic/integrative treatments, novel analgesic treatments and strategies, children with difficult-to-treat pain, prehospital pain management, eliminating health disparities, opioid misuse/abuse, and dissemination and implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 10 research questions identified as highest priority can inform future work by researchers, funders, policy makers, and other key decision makers who aim to meaningfully advance the management of pain in children cared for in the emergency care setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a high prevalence of acute pain in children cared for in the emergency care setting. However, there are still significant gaps in knowledge regarding optimal pain management. We aimed to develop a prioritized research agenda that identifies key questions for pediatric pain management in the emergency care setting that will guide future research and optimize care for children.

Methods: We used a modified Delphi approach to achieve consensus among a multidisciplinary and geographically diverse expert advisory group. An initial list of 108 research questions was identified, with successive rounds of questionnaires conducted until there was a convergence of opinion or a point of diminishing returns was reached. The list was iteratively refined each round by advisory group members who ranked research questions and provided suggestions for potential additional questions and feedback regarding questions considered.

Results: Twenty-nine advisory group members participated in the modified Delphi approach. Over the course of two rounds, we identified 10 research questions as the highest priority for future investigation. These questions included topics addressing short- and long-term outcomes related to inadequately assessed and treated pain, patient- and family-centered outcomes, optimizing analgesia in the emergency department (ED) and at home after discharge from the ED, nonpharmacologic/integrative treatments, novel analgesic treatments and strategies, children with difficult-to-treat pain, prehospital pain management, eliminating health disparities, opioid misuse/abuse, and dissemination and implementation.

Conclusions: The 10 research questions identified as highest priority can inform future work by researchers, funders, policy makers, and other key decision makers who aim to meaningfully advance the management of pain in children cared for in the emergency care setting.

急诊医学中儿科疼痛管理的研究重点。
背景:在急诊环境中接受治疗的儿童中急性疼痛的发生率很高。然而,关于最佳疼痛管理的知识仍然存在重大差距。我们的目标是制定一个优先的研究议程,确定在紧急护理环境中儿科疼痛管理的关键问题,这将指导未来的研究和优化儿童护理。方法:我们使用了一个改进的德尔菲法,以达成共识的多学科和地理不同的专家咨询小组。确定了108个研究问题的初步清单,并进行了连续几轮问卷调查,直到意见趋同或达到收益递减点。咨询小组成员对研究问题进行排名,并为潜在的附加问题提供建议,并就所考虑的问题提供反馈,每轮都对清单进行迭代改进。结果:29名顾问组成员参与了改进的德尔菲法。在两轮的过程中,我们确定了10个研究问题,作为未来调查的最高优先级。这些问题包括与不充分评估和治疗疼痛相关的短期和长期结果、以患者和家庭为中心的结果、优化急诊科(ED)和从ED出院后在家的镇痛、非药物/综合治疗、新型镇痛治疗和策略、难以治疗的疼痛儿童、院前疼痛管理、消除健康差异、阿片类药物滥用/滥用以及传播和实施。结论:确定为最优先的10个研究问题可以为研究人员、资助者、政策制定者和其他关键决策者的未来工作提供信息,这些决策者旨在有意义地推进急诊护理环境中儿童疼痛的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信