Evaluation of prenatal genetic counselors' abortion education and training as variables associated with self-efficacy

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Brianna J. Gentile, Rebecca LeShay Araujo, Jessica Kianmahd Shamshoni, Carole H. Browner, Christina G. S. Palmer
{"title":"Evaluation of prenatal genetic counselors' abortion education and training as variables associated with self-efficacy","authors":"Brianna J. Gentile,&nbsp;Rebecca LeShay Araujo,&nbsp;Jessica Kianmahd Shamshoni,&nbsp;Carole H. Browner,&nbsp;Christina G. S. Palmer","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prenatal genetic counselors in many states have modified their practices, considering new state-level abortion restrictions enacted after the 2022 US Supreme Court Dobbs decision. Therefore, genetic counselors' preparedness to counsel patients under these restrictions warrants new attention. Using a cross-sectional design, we assessed prenatal genetic counselors' self-efficacy given their exposures to abortion education during and after their graduate training and other variables potentially associated with self-efficacy. Participants were board-certified or eligible prenatal genetic counselors practicing in the United States. They completed an anonymous online survey, which assessed demographics, exposures to abortion topics, and the six-factor Genetic Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale (GCSES; subscale range 0 (low)-100 (high)), answered using context from a hypothetical prenatal case scenario. Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon rank sum tests compared median GCSES factor scores for each demographic and curricular variable. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests compared coverage of abortion topics according to location of graduate program (restrictive vs. protective state, per Guttmacher Institute). We analyzed 94 surveys (93% female, 53% aged &lt;25–34, 66% restrictive states). GCSES scores skewed high (65.00–100.00). Higher scores on complex skills, communication, genetic testing, and basic psychosocial skills were associated with older age (<i>p</i>'s &lt; 0.01), more years since graduation (<i>p</i>'s &lt; 0.01), and more years' experience practicing as a prenatal genetic counselor (<i>p</i>'s &lt; 0.01); graduate program exposure to counseling about pregnancy termination option was associated with higher scores on complex skills, communication, and genetic testing (<i>p</i>'s &lt; 0.05). Participants reported high self-efficacy to address the prenatal scenario regardless of location of graduate program or current practice. Still, if graduate programs wish to increase their coverage of abortion topics, our results indicate that exposures to counseling the option of pregnancy termination through practical experiences, such as clinical rotations or role plays, are the most effective didactic tools for promoting self-efficacy in prenatal sessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.2019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.2019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prenatal genetic counselors in many states have modified their practices, considering new state-level abortion restrictions enacted after the 2022 US Supreme Court Dobbs decision. Therefore, genetic counselors' preparedness to counsel patients under these restrictions warrants new attention. Using a cross-sectional design, we assessed prenatal genetic counselors' self-efficacy given their exposures to abortion education during and after their graduate training and other variables potentially associated with self-efficacy. Participants were board-certified or eligible prenatal genetic counselors practicing in the United States. They completed an anonymous online survey, which assessed demographics, exposures to abortion topics, and the six-factor Genetic Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale (GCSES; subscale range 0 (low)-100 (high)), answered using context from a hypothetical prenatal case scenario. Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon rank sum tests compared median GCSES factor scores for each demographic and curricular variable. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests compared coverage of abortion topics according to location of graduate program (restrictive vs. protective state, per Guttmacher Institute). We analyzed 94 surveys (93% female, 53% aged <25–34, 66% restrictive states). GCSES scores skewed high (65.00–100.00). Higher scores on complex skills, communication, genetic testing, and basic psychosocial skills were associated with older age (p's < 0.01), more years since graduation (p's < 0.01), and more years' experience practicing as a prenatal genetic counselor (p's < 0.01); graduate program exposure to counseling about pregnancy termination option was associated with higher scores on complex skills, communication, and genetic testing (p's < 0.05). Participants reported high self-efficacy to address the prenatal scenario regardless of location of graduate program or current practice. Still, if graduate programs wish to increase their coverage of abortion topics, our results indicate that exposures to counseling the option of pregnancy termination through practical experiences, such as clinical rotations or role plays, are the most effective didactic tools for promoting self-efficacy in prenatal sessions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信