Simplified petrophysical reconnaissance tool for evaluation of unconventional shales

0 ENERGY & FUELS
Samuel Gyasi, Steven K. Henderson, Dorcas S. Eyinla, Aman Arora
{"title":"Simplified petrophysical reconnaissance tool for evaluation of unconventional shales","authors":"Samuel Gyasi,&nbsp;Steven K. Henderson,&nbsp;Dorcas S. Eyinla,&nbsp;Aman Arora","doi":"10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Petrophysical evaluation of unconventional shale reservoirs is complex due to the formation's heterogeneity, requiring advanced methods to estimate parameters such as effective porosity (<span><math><mrow><msub><mo>∅</mo><mi>e</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>), effective water saturation (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>S</mi><mrow><mi>w</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span>), and permeability (<span><math><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow></math></span>). While various techniques are available to characterize these reservoirs, this study presents a simplified workflow for reconnaissance evaluations aimed at identifying sweet spots. The proposed method utilizes standard resistivity and porosity logs (e.g., triple or quad combo), making it accessible and reproducible for use in commercial software or spreadsheets, even by non-experts. By integrating modified Archie's equation, a log-based total organic carbon (TOC) estimate, and Lewis's cutoffs into a single composite curve, this approach streamlines the process of sweet spot identification. The combined methods were tested on the Wolfcamp Shale in the Permian Basin, as well as the Woodford and Bakken shales, consistently identifying similar sweet spot intervals. The results demonstrated a strong alignment between the intervals flagged by Archie's method and those identified using Lewis's cutoffs, with the upper section of Wolfcamp B meeting sweet spot criteria, while the lower section showed less consistency. Similar patterns were observed in the Woodford and Bakken shales, where primary sweet spots were determined based on consistent cutoff satisfaction. The methodology was further validated by comparing the results with landing depths from DrillingInfo reports, confirming its effectiveness across different formations. Thus, this cost-effective method presented in this study reduces the reliance on expensive tools like nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) or core analysis for sweet spot delineation, making it especially valuable for operators with budget constraints. Furthermore, the methodology provides an accessible approach for professionals of varying expertise levels, facilitating more informed decisions regarding lateral landing depths and net interval definitions in unconventional reservoirs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100578,"journal":{"name":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 213859"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891025002179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Petrophysical evaluation of unconventional shale reservoirs is complex due to the formation's heterogeneity, requiring advanced methods to estimate parameters such as effective porosity (e), effective water saturation (Swe), and permeability (k). While various techniques are available to characterize these reservoirs, this study presents a simplified workflow for reconnaissance evaluations aimed at identifying sweet spots. The proposed method utilizes standard resistivity and porosity logs (e.g., triple or quad combo), making it accessible and reproducible for use in commercial software or spreadsheets, even by non-experts. By integrating modified Archie's equation, a log-based total organic carbon (TOC) estimate, and Lewis's cutoffs into a single composite curve, this approach streamlines the process of sweet spot identification. The combined methods were tested on the Wolfcamp Shale in the Permian Basin, as well as the Woodford and Bakken shales, consistently identifying similar sweet spot intervals. The results demonstrated a strong alignment between the intervals flagged by Archie's method and those identified using Lewis's cutoffs, with the upper section of Wolfcamp B meeting sweet spot criteria, while the lower section showed less consistency. Similar patterns were observed in the Woodford and Bakken shales, where primary sweet spots were determined based on consistent cutoff satisfaction. The methodology was further validated by comparing the results with landing depths from DrillingInfo reports, confirming its effectiveness across different formations. Thus, this cost-effective method presented in this study reduces the reliance on expensive tools like nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) or core analysis for sweet spot delineation, making it especially valuable for operators with budget constraints. Furthermore, the methodology provides an accessible approach for professionals of varying expertise levels, facilitating more informed decisions regarding lateral landing depths and net interval definitions in unconventional reservoirs.
用于非常规页岩评价的简化岩石物性侦察工具
由于地层的非均质性,非常规页岩储层的岩石物理评价非常复杂,需要采用先进的方法来估计有效孔隙度(∅e)、有效含水饱和度(Swe)和渗透率(k)等参数。尽管有各种技术可以表征这些储层,但本研究提出了一种简化的旨在识别甜点的侦察评价工作流程。该方法采用标准的电阻率和孔隙度测井(例如三重或四次组合),即使是非专家也可以在商业软件或电子表格中使用。通过将修改后的Archie方程、基于对数的总有机碳(TOC)估计值和Lewis的截止值整合到一条复合曲线中,该方法简化了最佳点识别过程。在Permian盆地的Wolfcamp页岩、Woodford页岩和Bakken页岩中对这些组合方法进行了测试,一致地识别出了相似的甜点层段。结果表明,由Archie的方法标记的间隔与使用Lewis的截止点识别的间隔之间具有很强的一致性,Wolfcamp B的上部符合最佳点标准,而下部显示一致性较差。在Woodford和Bakken页岩中也观察到类似的模式,在这些页岩中,主要的甜点是根据一致的边界满意度确定的。通过将结果与DrillingInfo报告的着陆深度进行比较,进一步验证了该方法在不同地层中的有效性。因此,本研究中提出的这种经济有效的方法减少了对核磁共振(NMR)或岩心分析等昂贵工具的依赖,对于预算有限的作业者来说尤其有价值。此外,该方法为不同专业水平的专业人员提供了一种可访问的方法,有助于在非常规油藏的横向着陆深度和净层段定义方面做出更明智的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信