Green hydrogen extraction from natural gas transmission grids using hybrid membrane and PSA processes optimized via bayesian techniques

IF 3 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Homa Hamedi, Torsten Brinkmann
{"title":"Green hydrogen extraction from natural gas transmission grids using hybrid membrane and PSA processes optimized via bayesian techniques","authors":"Homa Hamedi,&nbsp;Torsten Brinkmann","doi":"10.1016/j.dche.2025.100234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Green hydrogen (H₂) is a leading enabler for the decarbonization of hard-to-abate industries where electrification is either uneconomical or infeasible. Establishing an adequate and cost-effective infrastructure for hydrogen distribution remains one of the primary barriers to its widespread adoption. A promising short-term solution to this challenge involves H₂ storage and co-transportation via existing gas grids. For H₂ extraction from distribution gas grids, standalone pressure swing adsorption systems are considered the most viable option, whereas a hybrid process is suggested in the literature for transmission gas networks. This article presents a comprehensive techno-economic model for the proposed hybrid process, developed using an integrated platform based on Aspen Adsorption and Aspen Custom Modeler. The system consists of a single-stage hollow fiber Matrimid membrane module, followed by a 4-bed adsorption process operating in 8 sequential steps to meet H₂ market purity requirements with an acceptable recovery rate. Since the performances of these two separation modules, as an integrated system, significantly influence each other, the study identifies a unique opportunity to minimize separation costs through process optimization. To reduce computational time, a cyclic steady-state approach was employed to simulate the PSA process. Bayesian optimization, facilitated by the integration of Python with Aspen Adsorption, was used to efficiently identify the optimal solution with a minimal number of objective function evaluations. The levelized cost of H₂ separation (99.0 % purity at 10 bar) from natural gas containing 10 % H<sub>2</sub> at pressures of 35 bar and 60 bar is estimated to be 2.7310 and, $2.5116/kg-H<sub>2</sub>, respectively. These estimates correspond to a scenario with 10 identical trains, each handling a feed flowrate of 200 kmol/hr. Increasing the number of trains keeps the cost contribution of PSA constant; however, the total cost decreases as the compression fixed cost is distributed across more trains.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72815,"journal":{"name":"Digital Chemical Engineering","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100234"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772508125000183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Green hydrogen (H₂) is a leading enabler for the decarbonization of hard-to-abate industries where electrification is either uneconomical or infeasible. Establishing an adequate and cost-effective infrastructure for hydrogen distribution remains one of the primary barriers to its widespread adoption. A promising short-term solution to this challenge involves H₂ storage and co-transportation via existing gas grids. For H₂ extraction from distribution gas grids, standalone pressure swing adsorption systems are considered the most viable option, whereas a hybrid process is suggested in the literature for transmission gas networks. This article presents a comprehensive techno-economic model for the proposed hybrid process, developed using an integrated platform based on Aspen Adsorption and Aspen Custom Modeler. The system consists of a single-stage hollow fiber Matrimid membrane module, followed by a 4-bed adsorption process operating in 8 sequential steps to meet H₂ market purity requirements with an acceptable recovery rate. Since the performances of these two separation modules, as an integrated system, significantly influence each other, the study identifies a unique opportunity to minimize separation costs through process optimization. To reduce computational time, a cyclic steady-state approach was employed to simulate the PSA process. Bayesian optimization, facilitated by the integration of Python with Aspen Adsorption, was used to efficiently identify the optimal solution with a minimal number of objective function evaluations. The levelized cost of H₂ separation (99.0 % purity at 10 bar) from natural gas containing 10 % H2 at pressures of 35 bar and 60 bar is estimated to be 2.7310 and, $2.5116/kg-H2, respectively. These estimates correspond to a scenario with 10 identical trains, each handling a feed flowrate of 200 kmol/hr. Increasing the number of trains keeps the cost contribution of PSA constant; however, the total cost decreases as the compression fixed cost is distributed across more trains.

Abstract Image

通过贝叶斯技术优化的混合膜和PSA工艺从天然气输电网中提取绿色氢气
绿色氢(H₂)是电气化不经济或不可行的难以减少的行业脱碳的主要推动者。建立一个足够的和具有成本效益的氢气分配基础设施仍然是其广泛采用的主要障碍之一。解决这一挑战的短期解决方案是通过现有的天然气网进行氢储存和联合运输。对于从配气网中提取H,独立变压吸附系统被认为是最可行的选择,而文献中建议在输气网络中采用混合过程。本文提出了一个综合的技术经济模型,该模型是利用基于杨木吸附和杨木定制建模器的集成平台开发的。该系统由单级中空纤维基质膜模块组成,然后是4层吸附工艺,分8个顺序步骤操作,以满足市场对h2纯度的要求,回收率可接受。由于这两个分离模块作为一个集成系统的性能会显著地相互影响,因此本研究确定了通过流程优化来最小化分离成本的独特机会。为了减少计算时间,采用循环稳态方法模拟PSA过程。利用Python和Aspen吸附相结合的贝叶斯优化方法,以最少的目标函数评价次数有效地识别出最优解。在35 bar和60 bar的压力下,从含有10% H2的天然气中分离H2(纯度为99.0%,10 bar)的平均成本估计分别为2.7310和2.5116美元/kg-H2。这些估计对应于10个相同列车的场景,每个列车处理200 kmol/hr的进料流量。增加列车数量保持PSA的成本贡献不变;然而,当压缩固定成本分布在更多的列车上时,总成本会降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信