Star Formation from Low to High Mass: A Comparative View

IF 26.3 1区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
H. Beuther, R. Kuiper, M. Tafalla
{"title":"Star Formation from Low to High Mass: A Comparative View","authors":"H. Beuther, R. Kuiper, M. Tafalla","doi":"10.1146/annurev-astro-013125-122023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Star formation has often been studied by separating the low- and high-mass regimes with an approximate boundary at 8 M<jats:sub>⊙</jats:sub>. Although some of the outcomes of the star-formation process are different between the two regimes, it is less clear whether the physical processes leading to these outcomes are that different at all. Here, we systematically compare low- and high-mass star formation by reviewing the most important processes and quantities from an observational and theoretical point of view. We identify three regimes in which processes are either similar, quantitatively, or qualitatively different between low- and high-mass star formation. <jats:list list-type=\"bullet\"> <jats:list-item> <jats:label>▪</jats:label> Similar characteristics can be identified for the turbulent gas properties and density structures of the star-forming regions. Many of the observational characteristics also do not depend that strongly on the environment. </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> <jats:label>▪</jats:label> Quantitative differences can be found for outflow, infall, and accretion rates as well as mean column and volume densities. Also, the multiplicity significantly rises from low- to high-mass stars. The importance of the magnetic field for the formation processes appears still less well constrained. </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> <jats:label>▪</jats:label> Qualitative differences between low- and high-mass star formation relate mainly to the radiative and ionizing feedback that occurs almost exclusively in regions forming high-mass stars. Nevertheless, accretion apparently can continue via disk structures in ionized accretion flows. </jats:list-item> </jats:list> Finally, we discuss to what extent a unified picture of star formation over all masses is possible and which issues need to be addressed in the future.","PeriodicalId":8138,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":26.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-013125-122023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Star formation has often been studied by separating the low- and high-mass regimes with an approximate boundary at 8 M. Although some of the outcomes of the star-formation process are different between the two regimes, it is less clear whether the physical processes leading to these outcomes are that different at all. Here, we systematically compare low- and high-mass star formation by reviewing the most important processes and quantities from an observational and theoretical point of view. We identify three regimes in which processes are either similar, quantitatively, or qualitatively different between low- and high-mass star formation. Similar characteristics can be identified for the turbulent gas properties and density structures of the star-forming regions. Many of the observational characteristics also do not depend that strongly on the environment. Quantitative differences can be found for outflow, infall, and accretion rates as well as mean column and volume densities. Also, the multiplicity significantly rises from low- to high-mass stars. The importance of the magnetic field for the formation processes appears still less well constrained. Qualitative differences between low- and high-mass star formation relate mainly to the radiative and ionizing feedback that occurs almost exclusively in regions forming high-mass stars. Nevertheless, accretion apparently can continue via disk structures in ionized accretion flows. Finally, we discuss to what extent a unified picture of star formation over all masses is possible and which issues need to be addressed in the future.
从低质量到高质量的恒星形成:比较视角
研究恒星形成的方法通常是将低质量区和高质量区分开,其近似边界在8 M⊙。尽管两种体制下恒星形成过程的一些结果是不同的,但导致这些结果的物理过程是否有那么大的不同尚不清楚。在这里,我们从观测和理论的角度回顾了最重要的过程和数量,系统地比较了低质量和高质量恒星的形成。我们确定了在低质量和高质量恒星形成过程中相似、定量或定性不同的三种机制。▪恒星形成区域的湍流气体特性和密度结构也可以识别出类似的特征。许多观测特征也不那么强烈地依赖于环境。▪流出、流入和吸积速率以及平均柱密度和体积密度都存在定量差异。此外,从低质量恒星到高质量恒星的多重性显著增加。磁场对地层过程的重要性似乎还没有得到很好的约束。▪低质量和高质量恒星形成的质量差异主要与辐射和电离反馈有关,这种反馈几乎只发生在形成高质量恒星的区域。然而,吸积显然可以通过电离吸积流中的盘状结构继续进行。最后,我们讨论了所有质量的恒星形成的统一图像在多大程度上是可能的,以及哪些问题需要在未来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
54.80
自引率
0.60%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics is covers significant developments in the field of astronomy and astrophysics including:The Sun,Solar system and extrasolar planets,Stars,Interstellar medium,Galaxy and galaxies,Active galactic nuclei,Cosmology,Instrumentation and techniques, History of the development of new areas of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信