Impact of Initial Relative Dose Intensity on Tumor Response and Survival Outcomes in Enfortumab Vedotin Monotherapy for Previously Treated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: A Real-world Analysis From a Multicenter Study.
{"title":"Impact of Initial Relative Dose Intensity on Tumor Response and Survival Outcomes in Enfortumab Vedotin Monotherapy for Previously Treated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: A Real-world Analysis From a Multicenter Study.","authors":"Makito Miyake, Nobutaka Nishimura, Yusuke Iemura, Motokiyo Yoshikawa, Kazumasa Torimoto, Atsushi Tomioka, Keichi Sakamoto, Yoshiaki Matsumura, Makito Naoi, Daiki Ichii, Kuniaki Inoue, Kosuke Narita, Nobuo Oyama, Mitsuru Tomizawa, Takuto Shimizu, Kenta Ohnishi, Shunta Hori, Yosuke Morizawa, Daisuke Gotoh, Yasushi Nakai, Nobumichi Tanaka, Kiyohide Fujimoto","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide real-world evidence regarding the association between the initial relative dose intensity (RDI) of enfortumab vedotin (iRDI-EV) during the first 2 to 3 cycles for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) and patient characteristics, including EV-Ineligible criTeriA (EVITA), tumor response, and survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter database registered 83 patients with locally advanced or metastatic treated with late-line EV monotherapy between 2021 and 2023. The iRDI-EV was calculated based on the dose modification during the first 2 to 3 cycles. A dose of 1.25 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle was considered the standard full regimen. Patients were categorized into RDI-1 (lowest), RDI-2, RDI-3, and RDI-full (100% RDI) groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 68 patients were available for iRDI-EV analysis and response evaluation. The overall median iRDI-EV was 87%, with 14, 13, 13, and 28 patients in the 4 groups exhibiting median iRDI-EV of 62%, 73%, 83%, and 100%, respectively. No clear association between the iRDI-EV and objective response was observed. The disease control rate was significantly higher in the RDI-full group (96%) than in the other groups. The patients in higher RDI groups (RDI-3/RDI-full) had longer progression-free survival than the lower RDI groups (RDI-1/RDI-2), with no difference in overall survival. A multiple linear regression analysis revealed higher iRDI-EV was a strong contributor to better response and longer survival. Of the 83 patients, 4 met ≥2 EVITA, exhibiting a higher risk of progression, whereas 79 had EVITA ≤1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oncologists must continue to learn from real-world data on late-line EV monotherapy for combination therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93941,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":" ","pages":"102326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To provide real-world evidence regarding the association between the initial relative dose intensity (RDI) of enfortumab vedotin (iRDI-EV) during the first 2 to 3 cycles for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) and patient characteristics, including EV-Ineligible criTeriA (EVITA), tumor response, and survival.
Methods: A multicenter database registered 83 patients with locally advanced or metastatic treated with late-line EV monotherapy between 2021 and 2023. The iRDI-EV was calculated based on the dose modification during the first 2 to 3 cycles. A dose of 1.25 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle was considered the standard full regimen. Patients were categorized into RDI-1 (lowest), RDI-2, RDI-3, and RDI-full (100% RDI) groups.
Results: In total, 68 patients were available for iRDI-EV analysis and response evaluation. The overall median iRDI-EV was 87%, with 14, 13, 13, and 28 patients in the 4 groups exhibiting median iRDI-EV of 62%, 73%, 83%, and 100%, respectively. No clear association between the iRDI-EV and objective response was observed. The disease control rate was significantly higher in the RDI-full group (96%) than in the other groups. The patients in higher RDI groups (RDI-3/RDI-full) had longer progression-free survival than the lower RDI groups (RDI-1/RDI-2), with no difference in overall survival. A multiple linear regression analysis revealed higher iRDI-EV was a strong contributor to better response and longer survival. Of the 83 patients, 4 met ≥2 EVITA, exhibiting a higher risk of progression, whereas 79 had EVITA ≤1.
Conclusions: Oncologists must continue to learn from real-world data on late-line EV monotherapy for combination therapy.