Parallelize Over Data Particle Advection: Participation, Ping Pong Particles, and Overhead.

Zhe Wang, Kenneth Moreland, Matthew Larsen, James Kress, Hank Childs, David Pugmire
{"title":"Parallelize Over Data Particle Advection: Participation, Ping Pong Particles, and Overhead.","authors":"Zhe Wang, Kenneth Moreland, Matthew Larsen, James Kress, Hank Childs, David Pugmire","doi":"10.1109/TVCG.2025.3557453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Particle advection is one of the foundational algorithms for visualization and analysis and is central to understanding vector fields common to scientific simulations. Achieving efficient performance with large data in a distributed memory setting is notoriously difficult. Because of its simplicity and minimized movement of large vector field data, the Parallelize over Data (POD) algorithm has become a de facto standard. Despite its simplicity and ubiquitous usage, the scaling issues with the POD algorithm are known and have been described throughout the literature. In this paper, we describe a set of in-depth analyses of the POD algorithm that shed new light on the underlying causes for the poor performance of this algorithm. We designed a series of representative workloads to study the performance of the POD algorithm and executed them on a supercomputer while collecting timing and statistical data for analysis. we then performed two different types of analysis. In the first analysis, we introduce two novel metrics for measuring algorithmic efficiency over the course of a workload run. The second analysis was from the perspective of the particles being advected. Using particlecentric analysis, we identify that the overheads associated with particle movement between processes (not the communication itself) have a dramatic impact on the overall execution time. These overheads become particularly costly when flow features span multiple blocks, resulting in repeated particle circulation (which we term \"ping pong particles\") between blocks. Our findings shed important light on the underlying causes of poor performance and offer directions for future research to address these limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94035,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2025.3557453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Particle advection is one of the foundational algorithms for visualization and analysis and is central to understanding vector fields common to scientific simulations. Achieving efficient performance with large data in a distributed memory setting is notoriously difficult. Because of its simplicity and minimized movement of large vector field data, the Parallelize over Data (POD) algorithm has become a de facto standard. Despite its simplicity and ubiquitous usage, the scaling issues with the POD algorithm are known and have been described throughout the literature. In this paper, we describe a set of in-depth analyses of the POD algorithm that shed new light on the underlying causes for the poor performance of this algorithm. We designed a series of representative workloads to study the performance of the POD algorithm and executed them on a supercomputer while collecting timing and statistical data for analysis. we then performed two different types of analysis. In the first analysis, we introduce two novel metrics for measuring algorithmic efficiency over the course of a workload run. The second analysis was from the perspective of the particles being advected. Using particlecentric analysis, we identify that the overheads associated with particle movement between processes (not the communication itself) have a dramatic impact on the overall execution time. These overheads become particularly costly when flow features span multiple blocks, resulting in repeated particle circulation (which we term "ping pong particles") between blocks. Our findings shed important light on the underlying causes of poor performance and offer directions for future research to address these limitations.

数据粒子平流上的并行化:参与、乒乓粒子和开销。
粒子平流是可视化和分析的基础算法之一,也是理解科学模拟中常见的矢量场的核心。在分布式内存设置中实现大数据的高效性能是非常困难的。由于其简单性和最小化大型矢量场数据的移动,POD (Parallelize over data)算法已经成为事实上的标准。尽管它的简单性和普遍使用,POD算法的缩放问题是已知的,并且在整个文献中都有描述。在本文中,我们描述了一组对POD算法的深入分析,揭示了该算法性能差的潜在原因。我们设计了一系列具有代表性的工作负载来研究POD算法的性能,并在超级计算机上执行,同时收集时序和统计数据进行分析。然后我们进行了两种不同类型的分析。在第一个分析中,我们介绍了两个新的度量标准,用于在工作负载运行过程中度量算法效率。第二次分析是从粒子被平流的角度进行的。使用粒子偏心分析,我们发现与进程之间粒子移动相关的开销(而不是通信本身)对总体执行时间有很大的影响。当流动特征跨越多个区块时,这些开销变得特别昂贵,导致区块之间重复的颗粒循环(我们称之为“乒乓颗粒”)。我们的研究结果揭示了表现不佳的潜在原因,并为未来的研究提供了解决这些限制的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信