Mass testing for discovery and control of COVID-19 outbreaks in adult social care: an observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis of 14 805 care homes in England.

BMJ public health Pub Date : 2025-03-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001376
Siyu Chen, Richard Creswell, Rachel Hounsell, Liberty Cantrell, Sumali Bajaj, Prabin Dahal, Joseph Tsui Lok Hei, Olumide Kolade, Ma'ayan Amswych, Reshania Naidoo, Tom Fowler, Susan Hopkins, Kasia Stepniewska, Merryn Voysey, Lisa White, Rima Shretta, Ben Lambert
{"title":"Mass testing for discovery and control of COVID-19 outbreaks in adult social care: an observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis of 14 805 care homes in England.","authors":"Siyu Chen, Richard Creswell, Rachel Hounsell, Liberty Cantrell, Sumali Bajaj, Prabin Dahal, Joseph Tsui Lok Hei, Olumide Kolade, Ma'ayan Amswych, Reshania Naidoo, Tom Fowler, Susan Hopkins, Kasia Stepniewska, Merryn Voysey, Lisa White, Rima Shretta, Ben Lambert","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated the impact of COVID-19 testing among residents and staff in social care homes in England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained 80 million reported PCR and lateral flow device (LFD) test results, from 14 805 care homes (residents and staff) in England, conducted between October 2020 and March 2022. These testing data were then linked to care home characteristics, test costs and 24 500 COVID-19-related deaths of residents. We decomposed the mechanism of outbreak mitigation into outbreak discovery and outbreak control and used Poisson regressions to investigate how reported testing intensity was associated with the size of outbreak discovered and to uncover its association with outbreak control. We used negative binomial regressions to determine the factors influencing COVID-19-related deaths subsequent to outbreaks. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of the impact of testing on preventing COVID-19-related deaths of residents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reported testing intensity generally reflected changes in testing policy over time, although there was considerable heterogeneity among care homes. Client type was the strongest determinant of whether COVID-19-related deaths in residents occurred subsequent to testing positive. Higher staff-to-resident ratios were associated with larger outbreak sizes but rapid outbreak control and a decreased risk of COVID-19-related deaths. Assuming our regression estimates represent causal effects, care home testing in England was cost-effective at preventing COVID-19-related deaths among residents during the pandemic and approximately 3.5 times more cost-effective prior to the vaccine rollout.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCR and LFD testing was likely an impactful intervention for detecting and controlling COVID-19 outbreaks in care homes in England and cost-effective for preventing COVID-19-related deaths among residents. In future pandemics, testing must be prioritised for care homes, especially if severe illness and death particularly affect older people or individuals with characteristics similar to care home residents, and an efficacious vaccine is unavailable.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"3 1","pages":"e001376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11962772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We retrospectively evaluated the impact of COVID-19 testing among residents and staff in social care homes in England.

Methods: We obtained 80 million reported PCR and lateral flow device (LFD) test results, from 14 805 care homes (residents and staff) in England, conducted between October 2020 and March 2022. These testing data were then linked to care home characteristics, test costs and 24 500 COVID-19-related deaths of residents. We decomposed the mechanism of outbreak mitigation into outbreak discovery and outbreak control and used Poisson regressions to investigate how reported testing intensity was associated with the size of outbreak discovered and to uncover its association with outbreak control. We used negative binomial regressions to determine the factors influencing COVID-19-related deaths subsequent to outbreaks. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of the impact of testing on preventing COVID-19-related deaths of residents.

Results: Reported testing intensity generally reflected changes in testing policy over time, although there was considerable heterogeneity among care homes. Client type was the strongest determinant of whether COVID-19-related deaths in residents occurred subsequent to testing positive. Higher staff-to-resident ratios were associated with larger outbreak sizes but rapid outbreak control and a decreased risk of COVID-19-related deaths. Assuming our regression estimates represent causal effects, care home testing in England was cost-effective at preventing COVID-19-related deaths among residents during the pandemic and approximately 3.5 times more cost-effective prior to the vaccine rollout.

Conclusions: PCR and LFD testing was likely an impactful intervention for detecting and controlling COVID-19 outbreaks in care homes in England and cost-effective for preventing COVID-19-related deaths among residents. In future pandemics, testing must be prioritised for care homes, especially if severe illness and death particularly affect older people or individuals with characteristics similar to care home residents, and an efficacious vaccine is unavailable.

发现和控制成人社会护理中爆发的 COVID-19 的大规模检测:对英格兰 14 805 家护理院的观察研究和成本效益分析。
我们回顾性地评估了COVID-19检测对英格兰社会护理院居民和工作人员的影响。方法:我们从2020年10月至2022年3月期间在英格兰的14805家养老院(居民和工作人员)中获得了8000万份报告的PCR和横向流动装置(LFD)检测结果。然后将这些测试数据与养老院的特征、测试成本和24500名与covid -19相关的居民死亡联系起来。我们将疫情缓解机制分解为疫情发现和疫情控制,并使用泊松回归来研究报告的检测强度如何与发现的疫情规模相关,并揭示其与疫情控制的关联。我们使用负二项回归来确定疫情爆发后影响covid -19相关死亡的因素。我们对检测对预防居民covid -19相关死亡的影响进行了成本效益分析。结果:报告的测试强度一般反映了测试政策随时间的变化,尽管在养老院之间存在相当大的异质性。客户类型是在检测呈阳性后居民中是否发生与covid -19相关死亡的最重要决定因素。较高的工作人员与居民比例与更大的疫情规模、更快的疫情控制和更低的covid -19相关死亡风险相关。假设我们的回归估计代表因果关系,那么英格兰的养老院测试在预防大流行期间居民中与covid -19相关的死亡方面具有成本效益,在疫苗推出之前的成本效益约为3.5倍。结论:PCR和LFD检测可能是英格兰养老院检测和控制COVID-19疫情的有效干预措施,对于预防居民中与COVID-19相关的死亡具有成本效益。在未来的大流行中,必须优先对养老院进行检测,特别是在严重疾病和死亡特别影响老年人或具有与养老院居民相似特征的个人,并且无法获得有效疫苗的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信