[Comparison of the Impact of Deep Learning Techniques on Low-noise Head CT Images].

Takuro Tahara, Seigo Yoshida
{"title":"[Comparison of the Impact of Deep Learning Techniques on Low-noise Head CT Images].","authors":"Takuro Tahara, Seigo Yoshida","doi":"10.6009/jjrt.25-1537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to compare the effects of two types of deep learning (DL) techniques on brain CT values, image noise content, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between white and gray matter in low-noise head CT images, along with adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one normal patients with no abnormal findings who underwent head CT for identification of acute illness were included in the study. DL techniques used were Advanced intelligent Clear-IQ Engine (AiCE, Canon Medical systems, Tochigi, Japan) and PixelShine (FUJIFILM Medical, Tokyo, Japan). We performed CT value measurements of 26 cerebrum regions, image noise measurements, and CNR calculations. We also conducted a visual assessment of image noise and white matter-gray matter contrast on a 5-point scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Image noise significantly decreased with DL techniques. CT values changed significantly with AiCE. CNR for white matter-gray matter was the highest with PixelShine (P<0.01). The visual assessment of white matter-gray matter contrast was the highest for PixelShine and the lowest for AiCE (P<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While DL techniques reduce image noise, there are differences in CT values and visual impression, especially white matter-gray matter contrast, so care should be taken when using it.</p>","PeriodicalId":74309,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","volume":"81 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.25-1537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to compare the effects of two types of deep learning (DL) techniques on brain CT values, image noise content, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between white and gray matter in low-noise head CT images, along with adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D).

Methods: Twenty-one normal patients with no abnormal findings who underwent head CT for identification of acute illness were included in the study. DL techniques used were Advanced intelligent Clear-IQ Engine (AiCE, Canon Medical systems, Tochigi, Japan) and PixelShine (FUJIFILM Medical, Tokyo, Japan). We performed CT value measurements of 26 cerebrum regions, image noise measurements, and CNR calculations. We also conducted a visual assessment of image noise and white matter-gray matter contrast on a 5-point scale.

Results: Image noise significantly decreased with DL techniques. CT values changed significantly with AiCE. CNR for white matter-gray matter was the highest with PixelShine (P<0.01). The visual assessment of white matter-gray matter contrast was the highest for PixelShine and the lowest for AiCE (P<0.01).

Conclusion: While DL techniques reduce image noise, there are differences in CT values and visual impression, especially white matter-gray matter contrast, so care should be taken when using it.

[深度学习技术对低噪声头部CT图像影响的比较]。
目的:本研究旨在比较两种类型的深度学习(DL)技术对低噪声头部CT图像中脑CT值、图像噪声含量以及白质和灰质之间的对比度-噪声比(CNR)以及自适应迭代剂量降低3D(AIDR 3D)的影响:研究对象包括 21 名无异常发现的正常患者,他们接受了头部 CT 检查以确定急性疾病。使用的 DL 技术是高级智能 Clear-IQ 引擎(AiCE,佳能医疗系统,日本枥木)和 PixelShine(富士胶片医疗,日本东京)。我们对 26 个大脑区域进行了 CT 值测量、图像噪声测量和 CNR 计算。我们还对图像噪声和白质-灰质对比度进行了 5 级视觉评估:结果:采用 DL 技术后,图像噪声明显降低。AiCE的CT值变化明显。PixelShine(PC)的白质-灰质 CNR 最高:虽然 DL 技术降低了图像噪声,但 CT 值和视觉印象(尤其是白质-灰质对比度)存在差异,因此在使用时应小心谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信