A Pilot Study of Capturing Patient Reported Outcome Measures in the Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Rasa Ruseckaite, Randi Jayasinghe, Michelle Merenda, Chethana Mudunna, Helen E O'Connell, Elizabeth Gallagher, Jennifer King, James Keck, Jessica Yin, Susannah Ahern
{"title":"A Pilot Study of Capturing Patient Reported Outcome Measures in the Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry.","authors":"Rasa Ruseckaite, Randi Jayasinghe, Michelle Merenda, Chethana Mudunna, Helen E O'Connell, Elizabeth Gallagher, Jennifer King, James Keck, Jessica Yin, Susannah Ahern","doi":"10.1111/ajo.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are increasingly being introduced in clinical registries. The Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) is a clinical quality registry which records information about procedures for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of capturing PROMs in women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) identified via the APFPR, using various modes and methods of administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (APFQ) in women with PFDs prior to surgery (baseline) and 6 months post-surgery through a combination of email, postal mail, SMS and telephone. The study was carried out from July 2022 to May 2023. Results were reported descriptively, as number and proportion for PROMs response rates and data completeness, and as a mean and standard deviation (SD) for the APFQ scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The APFQ was administered to 140 patients at baseline and to 112 post-surgery. The baseline PROMs response rates were high (75%), but decreased to 56% at follow up. The overall APFQ completeness was ~98%. The APFQ dysfunction scores revealed a significant improvement at 6 months (mean [SD] score at baseline = 14.5 [5.7], 6 months = 11.4 [6.5], p ≤ 0.001). Significant improvement in the bladder and prolapse domains (p ≤ 0.001) were particularly observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results showed an overall improvement in quality of life scores at follow up. The APFQ data completeness was high and response rates were satisfactory, suggesting that the APFQ was a suitable instrument for the APFPR.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.70030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are increasingly being introduced in clinical registries. The Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) is a clinical quality registry which records information about procedures for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of capturing PROMs in women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) identified via the APFPR, using various modes and methods of administration.

Methods: We administered the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (APFQ) in women with PFDs prior to surgery (baseline) and 6 months post-surgery through a combination of email, postal mail, SMS and telephone. The study was carried out from July 2022 to May 2023. Results were reported descriptively, as number and proportion for PROMs response rates and data completeness, and as a mean and standard deviation (SD) for the APFQ scores.

Results: The APFQ was administered to 140 patients at baseline and to 112 post-surgery. The baseline PROMs response rates were high (75%), but decreased to 56% at follow up. The overall APFQ completeness was ~98%. The APFQ dysfunction scores revealed a significant improvement at 6 months (mean [SD] score at baseline = 14.5 [5.7], 6 months = 11.4 [6.5], p ≤ 0.001). Significant improvement in the bladder and prolapse domains (p ≤ 0.001) were particularly observed.

Conclusion: The results showed an overall improvement in quality of life scores at follow up. The APFQ data completeness was high and response rates were satisfactory, suggesting that the APFQ was a suitable instrument for the APFPR.

一项在澳大利亚盆底手术登记处收集患者报告的结果措施的试点研究。
背景:患者报告结果测量(PROMs)越来越多地被引入临床登记。澳大利亚盆底手术登记处(APFPR)是一个临床质量登记处,记录有关压力性尿失禁和盆腔器官脱垂的手术信息。本研究旨在通过不同的给药模式和方法,确定通过APFPR识别的盆底疾病(PFDs)女性中捕获PROMs的可行性。方法:我们通过电子邮件、邮政邮件、短信和电话等方式对pfd患者在手术前(基线)和术后6个月进行澳大利亚盆底问卷调查(APFQ)。该研究于2022年7月至2023年5月进行。结果以描述性的方式报告,如PROMs应答率和数据完整性的数量和比例,以及APFQ得分的平均值和标准差(SD)。结果:140例患者在基线时使用APFQ, 112例患者在术后使用APFQ。基线PROMs反应率很高(75%),但在随访时下降到56%。APFQ的总体完备性为98%。APFQ功能障碍评分在6个月时显示有显著改善(基线时平均[SD]评分为14.5[5.7],6个月时平均[SD]评分为11.4 [6.5],p≤0.001)。膀胱和脱垂域明显改善(p≤0.001)。结论:随访结果显示患者生活质量评分整体改善。APFQ数据完整性高,反应率满意,表明APFQ是APFPR的合适工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信